Re: [kbuild-all] [RFC PATCH] KASLR: mem_avoid_memmap_index can be static

[Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>]

On 04/24/17 at 05:04pm, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 05:00:40PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Hi Fengguang,
> > 
> > Thanks for pointing it out!
> > 
> > I am fine with defining mem_avoid_memmap_index it as static variable.
> > While Liyang suggested using a local static inside mem_avoid_memmap,
> > then mem_avoid_memmap_index is not needed any more. Do you think it's OK
> > to you?
> 
> Yes, that'd be a better solution. It's a robot generated patch and is
> open for optimization or correction.

Oh, the tip robot is so great! Thanks for telling, then let me repost.

> 
> > On 04/24/17 at 04:48pm, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  kaslr.c |    2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> > > index 6649ecd..7190d35 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> > > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct mem_vector {
> > >  #define MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS	4
> > > 
> > >  static bool memmap_too_large;
> > > -int mem_avoid_memmap_index;
> > > +static int mem_avoid_memmap_index;
> > >  extern unsigned long get_cmd_line_ptr(void);
> > > 
> > > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > kbuild-all mailing list
> > kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild-all