All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	Pardha Saradhi K <pardha.saradhi.kesapragada@intel.com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	G Kranthi <gudishax.kranthikumar@intel.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>,
	Hardik T Shah <hardik.t.shah@intel.com>,
	Jeeja KP <jeeja.kp@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Fix to use list_for_each_safe() when delete items
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:30:35 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170425040035.GY6263@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170425032817.21959-1-weiyj.lk@gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 03:28:17AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> 
> Since we will remove items off the list using list_del() we need
> to use a safe version of the list_for_each() macro aptly named
> list_for_each_safe().

ah yes, god catch

> This is detected by Coccinelle semantic patch.

It is a good practice to include the script you used, do you mind adding
that in the log?

> 
> Fixes: b8c722ddd548 ("ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Add support for deferred
> DSP module bind")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-pcm.c | 4 ++--
>  sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c | 4 ++--
>  2 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-pcm.c b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-pcm.c
> index 600faad..d43d197 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-pcm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-pcm.c
> @@ -1323,10 +1323,10 @@ int skl_platform_unregister(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct hdac_ext_bus *ebus = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct skl *skl = ebus_to_skl(ebus);
> -	struct skl_module_deferred_bind *modules;
> +	struct skl_module_deferred_bind *modules, *tmp;
>  
>  	if (!list_empty(&skl->bind_list)) {
> -		list_for_each_entry(modules, &skl->bind_list, node) {
> +		list_for_each_entry_safe(modules, tmp, &skl->bind_list, node) {
>  			list_del(&modules->node);
>  			kfree(modules);
>  		}
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c
> index 74b3acf..aea7917 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c
> @@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ static int skl_tplg_mixer_dapm_post_pmd_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
>  	struct skl_module_cfg *src_module = NULL, *dst_module;
>  	struct skl_sst *ctx = skl->skl_sst;
>  	struct skl_pipe *s_pipe = mconfig->pipe;
> -	struct skl_module_deferred_bind *modules;
> +	struct skl_module_deferred_bind *modules, *tmp;
>  
>  	if (s_pipe->state == SKL_PIPE_INVALID)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static int skl_tplg_mixer_dapm_post_pmd_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
>  
>  		src_module = w_module->w->priv;
>  
> -		list_for_each_entry(modules, &skl->bind_list, node) {
> +		list_for_each_entry_safe(modules, tmp, &skl->bind_list, node) {
>  			/*
>  			 * When the destination module is deleted, Unbind the
>  			 * modules from deferred bind list.
> 

-- 
~Vinod

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Pardha Saradhi K <pardha.saradhi.kesapragada@intel.com>,
	G Kranthi <gudishax.kranthikumar@intel.com>,
	Hardik T Shah <hardik.t.shah@intel.com>,
	Jeeja KP <jeeja.kp@intel.com>,
	Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Fix to use list_for_each_safe() when delete items
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:30:35 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170425040035.GY6263@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170425032817.21959-1-weiyj.lk@gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 03:28:17AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> 
> Since we will remove items off the list using list_del() we need
> to use a safe version of the list_for_each() macro aptly named
> list_for_each_safe().

ah yes, god catch

> This is detected by Coccinelle semantic patch.

It is a good practice to include the script you used, do you mind adding
that in the log?

> 
> Fixes: b8c722ddd548 ("ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Add support for deferred
> DSP module bind")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-pcm.c | 4 ++--
>  sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c | 4 ++--
>  2 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-pcm.c b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-pcm.c
> index 600faad..d43d197 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-pcm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-pcm.c
> @@ -1323,10 +1323,10 @@ int skl_platform_unregister(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct hdac_ext_bus *ebus = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct skl *skl = ebus_to_skl(ebus);
> -	struct skl_module_deferred_bind *modules;
> +	struct skl_module_deferred_bind *modules, *tmp;
>  
>  	if (!list_empty(&skl->bind_list)) {
> -		list_for_each_entry(modules, &skl->bind_list, node) {
> +		list_for_each_entry_safe(modules, tmp, &skl->bind_list, node) {
>  			list_del(&modules->node);
>  			kfree(modules);
>  		}
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c
> index 74b3acf..aea7917 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c
> @@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ static int skl_tplg_mixer_dapm_post_pmd_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
>  	struct skl_module_cfg *src_module = NULL, *dst_module;
>  	struct skl_sst *ctx = skl->skl_sst;
>  	struct skl_pipe *s_pipe = mconfig->pipe;
> -	struct skl_module_deferred_bind *modules;
> +	struct skl_module_deferred_bind *modules, *tmp;
>  
>  	if (s_pipe->state == SKL_PIPE_INVALID)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static int skl_tplg_mixer_dapm_post_pmd_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
>  
>  		src_module = w_module->w->priv;
>  
> -		list_for_each_entry(modules, &skl->bind_list, node) {
> +		list_for_each_entry_safe(modules, tmp, &skl->bind_list, node) {
>  			/*
>  			 * When the destination module is deleted, Unbind the
>  			 * modules from deferred bind list.
> 

-- 
~Vinod

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-25  3:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-25  3:28 [PATCH -next] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Fix to use list_for_each_safe() when delete items Wei Yongjun
2017-04-25  3:28 ` Wei Yongjun
2017-04-25  4:00 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2017-04-25  4:00   ` Vinod Koul
2017-04-25  7:57   ` weiyongjun (A)
2017-04-26  5:38     ` Vinod Koul
2017-04-26  5:38       ` Vinod Koul
2017-04-26  5:39       ` weiyongjun (A)
2017-04-28  8:06       ` weiyongjun (A)
2017-04-28  8:06         ` weiyongjun (A)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170425040035.GY6263@localhost \
    --to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=gudishax.kranthikumar@intel.com \
    --cc=hardik.t.shah@intel.com \
    --cc=jeeja.kp@intel.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pardha.saradhi.kesapragada@intel.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --cc=weiyj.lk@gmail.com \
    --cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.