All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: update ->init_request and ->exit_request prototypes
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:09:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170428140923.GA32073@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49inlpsoey.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 02:20:21PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Hi, Christoph,
> 
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes:
> 
> > Remove the request_idx parameter, which can't be used safely now that we
> > support I/O schedulers with blk-mq.  Except for a superflous check in
> > mtip32xx it was unused anyway.
> 
> I'm not sure how your patch builds.  If I look at the mtip32xx driver in
> for-4.12/post-merge, I see this:

Meh, you're right.  It did build fine when I tested it based on Jens'
for-4.12/block + my nvme PR.  But it seems like the post-merge merge
branch doesn't have the previous mtip32xxx fix yet that is a prerequisite
for this change.  Jens:  any idea why?  I'm getting lost in the maze
of branches..

> If you got rid of request_idx, then this shouldn't build.  So, is there
> some other prerequisite patch I'm missing?

Yes, both you and I are.  It's "mtip32xx: use runtime tag to initialize
command header" which is in Jens' for-4.12/block tree, but not in the
post-merge one.

> 
> Note that the patch that introduced the request_idx check fixed a bug,
> where module load would walk off the end of an array.  See commit
> 74c9c9134bf8.

Yes, but that behavior is gone with the above patch, which was
necessary to support blk-mq I/O schedulers.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: update ->init_request and ->exit_request prototypes
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:09:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170428140923.GA32073@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49inlpsoey.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017@02:20:21PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Hi, Christoph,
> 
> Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> writes:
> 
> > Remove the request_idx parameter, which can't be used safely now that we
> > support I/O schedulers with blk-mq.  Except for a superflous check in
> > mtip32xx it was unused anyway.
> 
> I'm not sure how your patch builds.  If I look at the mtip32xx driver in
> for-4.12/post-merge, I see this:

Meh, you're right.  It did build fine when I tested it based on Jens'
for-4.12/block + my nvme PR.  But it seems like the post-merge merge
branch doesn't have the previous mtip32xxx fix yet that is a prerequisite
for this change.  Jens:  any idea why?  I'm getting lost in the maze
of branches..

> If you got rid of request_idx, then this shouldn't build.  So, is there
> some other prerequisite patch I'm missing?

Yes, both you and I are.  It's "mtip32xx: use runtime tag to initialize
command header" which is in Jens' for-4.12/block tree, but not in the
post-merge one.

> 
> Note that the patch that introduced the request_idx check fixed a bug,
> where module load would walk off the end of an array.  See commit
> 74c9c9134bf8.

Yes, but that behavior is gone with the above patch, which was
necessary to support blk-mq I/O schedulers.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-28 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-27 17:44 update ->init_request and ->exit_request prototypes Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 17:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 17:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: " Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 17:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 18:20   ` Jeff Moyer
2017-04-27 18:20     ` Jeff Moyer
2017-04-28 14:09     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-04-28 14:09       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-28 14:19       ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-28 14:19         ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-28 14:20         ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-28 14:20           ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-28 14:24           ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-28 14:24             ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-28 14:27       ` Jeff Moyer
2017-04-28 14:27         ` Jeff Moyer
2017-04-27 17:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvme-pci: merge init_request methods Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 17:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 17:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvme-rdma: merge init_request and exit_request methods Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 17:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 17:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme-fc: merge init_request methods Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 17:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 17:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme-loop: " Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 17:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-28 14:53 ` update ->init_request and ->exit_request prototypes Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-28 14:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-03  7:53   ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-05-03  7:53     ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170428140923.GA32073@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.