From: mathieu.poirier@linaro.org (Mathieu Poirier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] coresight: use const for device_node structures
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 14:21:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170503202136.GA7860@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1493712903-16726-1-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org>
Hi Leo,
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 04:15:03PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> Almost low level functions from open firmware have used const to
> qualify device_node structures, so add const for device_node
> parameters in of_coresight related functions.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 4 ++--
> include/linux/coresight.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> index 629e031..859ad49 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ of_coresight_get_endpoint_device(struct device_node *endpoint)
> endpoint, of_dev_node_match);
> }
>
> -static void of_coresight_get_ports(struct device_node *node,
> +static void of_coresight_get_ports(const struct device_node *node,
> int *nr_inport, int *nr_outport)
> {
> struct device_node *ep = NULL;
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int of_coresight_alloc_memory(struct device *dev,
> }
>
> struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> - struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
> + struct device *dev, const struct device_node *node)
The original code didn't do things right. I suggest:
struct coresight_platform_data *
of_get_coresight_platform_data(struct device *dev,
const struct device_node *node)
> {
> int i = 0, ret = 0, cpu;
> struct coresight_platform_data *pdata;
> diff --git a/include/linux/coresight.h b/include/linux/coresight.h
> index 2a5982c..769f2c8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/coresight.h
> +++ b/include/linux/coresight.h
> @@ -264,10 +264,10 @@ static inline int coresight_timeout(void __iomem *addr, u32 offset,
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> extern struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> - struct device *dev, struct device_node *node);
> + struct device *dev, const struct device_node *node);
Same as above.
Please send me another revision and I'll pick this up for the next cycle.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> #else
> static inline struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> - struct device *dev, struct device_node *node) { return NULL; }
> + struct device *dev, const struct device_node *node) { return NULL; }
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS
> --
> 2.7.4
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: use const for device_node structures
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 14:21:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170503202136.GA7860@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1493712903-16726-1-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org>
Hi Leo,
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 04:15:03PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> Almost low level functions from open firmware have used const to
> qualify device_node structures, so add const for device_node
> parameters in of_coresight related functions.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 4 ++--
> include/linux/coresight.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> index 629e031..859ad49 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ of_coresight_get_endpoint_device(struct device_node *endpoint)
> endpoint, of_dev_node_match);
> }
>
> -static void of_coresight_get_ports(struct device_node *node,
> +static void of_coresight_get_ports(const struct device_node *node,
> int *nr_inport, int *nr_outport)
> {
> struct device_node *ep = NULL;
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int of_coresight_alloc_memory(struct device *dev,
> }
>
> struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> - struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
> + struct device *dev, const struct device_node *node)
The original code didn't do things right. I suggest:
struct coresight_platform_data *
of_get_coresight_platform_data(struct device *dev,
const struct device_node *node)
> {
> int i = 0, ret = 0, cpu;
> struct coresight_platform_data *pdata;
> diff --git a/include/linux/coresight.h b/include/linux/coresight.h
> index 2a5982c..769f2c8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/coresight.h
> +++ b/include/linux/coresight.h
> @@ -264,10 +264,10 @@ static inline int coresight_timeout(void __iomem *addr, u32 offset,
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> extern struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> - struct device *dev, struct device_node *node);
> + struct device *dev, const struct device_node *node);
Same as above.
Please send me another revision and I'll pick this up for the next cycle.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> #else
> static inline struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> - struct device *dev, struct device_node *node) { return NULL; }
> + struct device *dev, const struct device_node *node) { return NULL; }
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-03 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-02 8:15 [PATCH] coresight: use const for device_node structures Leo Yan
2017-05-02 8:15 ` Leo Yan
2017-05-03 20:21 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2017-05-03 20:21 ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-05-04 0:40 ` Leo Yan
2017-05-04 0:40 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170503202136.GA7860@linaro.org \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.