All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@163.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de,
	Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: don't setup nat info for confirmed ct
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 18:46:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170515164624.GA3948@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170506122802.5630-1-zlpnobody@163.com>

On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 08:28:02PM +0800, Liping Zhang wrote:
> From: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
> 
> We cannot setup nat info if the ct has been confirmed already, else,
> different cpu may race to handle the same ct. In extreme situation,
> we may hit the "BUG_ON(nf_nat_initialized(ct, maniptype))" in the
> nf_nat_setup_info.
> 
> Also running the following commands will easily hit NF_CT_ASSERT in
> nf_conntrack_alter_reply:
>   # nft flush ruleset
>   # ping -c 2 -W 1 1.1.1.111 &
>   # nft add table t
>   # nft add chain t c {type nat hook postrouting priority 0 \;}
>   # nft add rule t c snat to 4.5.6.7
>   WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 10065 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:1472
>   nf_conntrack_alter_reply+0x9a/0x1a0 [nf_conntrack]
>   [...]
>   Call Trace:
>    nf_nat_setup_info+0xad/0x840 [nf_nat]
>    ? deactivate_slab+0x65d/0x6c0
>    nft_nat_eval+0xcd/0x100 [nft_nat]
>    nft_do_chain+0xff/0x5d0 [nf_tables]
>    ? mark_held_locks+0x6f/0xa0
>    ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x70/0xa0
>    ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x11f/0x190
>    ? ipt_do_table+0x310/0x610
>    ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
>    ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x70/0xa0
>    ? ipt_do_table+0x32b/0x610
>    ? __lock_acquire+0x2ac/0x1580
>    ? ipt_do_table+0x32b/0x610
>    nft_nat_do_chain+0x65/0x80 [nft_chain_nat_ipv4]
>    nf_nat_ipv4_fn+0x1ae/0x240 [nf_nat_ipv4]
>    nf_nat_ipv4_out+0x4a/0xf0 [nf_nat_ipv4]
>    nft_nat_ipv4_out+0x15/0x20 [nft_chain_nat_ipv4]
>    nf_hook_slow+0x2c/0xf0
>    ip_output+0x154/0x270
> 
> So for the confirmed ct, just ignore it and return NF_ACCEPT.

Applied, thanks.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-15 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-06 12:28 [PATCH nf] netfilter: don't setup nat info for confirmed ct Liping Zhang
2017-05-06 19:09 ` Florian Westphal
2017-05-15 16:36 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-05-15 16:46 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170515164624.GA3948@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlpnobody@163.com \
    --cc=zlpnobody@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.