All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup.patel@broadcom.com>,
	"dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: remove redundant null check on req
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 03:34:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170519032251.GK15061@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4iD5xD8E3E9+gbgmrbD+nNpXfjMqi4WzTA46H9mSv5gvQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:12:00PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> >
> > Req is never null on at the point of the null check, so
> > remove this redundant check and just return &req->tx.
> >
> > Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1436147 ("Logically dead code")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Hi Colin,
> 
> Looks good, can you also include the driver name in your patch subjects?
> 
> For example "dmaengine, bcm-scm-raid: remove redundant null check on
> req", would make it clear that this is a driver fix and not a core
> dmaengine issue.

Yeah that would help, also do the same for static patch you sent on the
driver.
-- 
~Vinod

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup.patel@broadcom.com>,
	"dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: remove redundant null check on req
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 08:52:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170519032251.GK15061@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4iD5xD8E3E9+gbgmrbD+nNpXfjMqi4WzTA46H9mSv5gvQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:12:00PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> >
> > Req is never null on at the point of the null check, so
> > remove this redundant check and just return &req->tx.
> >
> > Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1436147 ("Logically dead code")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Hi Colin,
> 
> Looks good, can you also include the driver name in your patch subjects?
> 
> For example "dmaengine, bcm-scm-raid: remove redundant null check on
> req", would make it clear that this is a driver fix and not a core
> dmaengine issue.

Yeah that would help, also do the same for static patch you sent on the
driver.
-- 
~Vinod

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-19  3:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-17 13:35 [PATCH] dmaengine: remove redundant null check on req Colin King
2017-05-17 13:35 ` Colin King
2017-05-17 19:12 ` Dan Williams
2017-05-17 19:12   ` Dan Williams
2017-05-19  3:22   ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2017-05-19  3:34     ` Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170519032251.GK15061@localhost \
    --to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    --cc=anup.patel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.