[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:44:26PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 24/05/17 12:50, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Hej Patrick,
> > 
> > Am 09.05.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Patrick Wildt:
> >> The NanoPi Neo2 is basically the same as the NanoPi Neo, but that they
> >> replaced the SoC with the 64-bit Allwinner H5 SoC.  Add a (64-bit only)
> >> defconfig defining the required options to build the U-Boot proper.
> >>
> >> Create a new .dts file for it by including the (32-bit) H3 SoC .dtsi
> >> and changing the differing components accordingly, like it's been
> >> done for the OrangePi PC 2.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Patrick Wildt <patrick@blueri.se>
> > 
> > I've tested this patch on top of yesterday's master branch
> > (4c78028737c3185f49f5691183aeac3478b5f699 "mksunxi_fit_atf.sh: Allow for
> > this to complete when bl31.bin is missing").
> > 
> > Considering Tom's unanswered question, is there any diff to the upstream
> > kernel .dts? Expected would be to just copy the Linux .dts file here and
> > to state which tree and commit/tag it was taken from.
> 
> I think we have a similar diversion between Linux and U-Boot .dts here,
> given that the U-Boot support was merged earlier.
> Updating the DTs for H5 and the board(s) was on my plan, but it's a bit
> more involved since it affects the H3 .dts as well (H3 and H5 use a
> shared stub .dtsi now). Also the H5 .dtsi just got into Linux
> (4.12-rc1), so it hasn't been in an officially released kernel yet.

I'm fine with re-syncing to v4.12-rc2, btw.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20170524/89bd152d/attachment.sig>