[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 05:59:35PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:57:48AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 05:56:09PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 08:27:02PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> > > > > Am 01.06.2017 um 16:04 schrieb Patrick Wildt:
> > > > >> What's holding us up from using the Linux device trees without any
> > > > >> changes?  This diff I attach inline copies all a64, h3 and h5 related
> > > > >> files from v4.12-rc3 (so, mainline) and modifies the emac driver to
> > > > >> use the new pinmux attributes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Andre or someone had already sent a series sync'ing a64 and pine64. Can
> > > > > you keep h5/h3 separate or rebase onto that series please to not cause
> > > > > merge conflicts? Thanks for your work on this.
> > > > 
> > > > Yeah, it's been on u-boot-sunxi/master
> > > > 
> > > > thanks!
> > > 
> > > I had already rebased it against u-boot-sunxi/master, so the attached
> > > diff should be fine.  Should I send it as a separate [PATCH] mail?
> > 
> > To be clear, you were re-syncing those boards with only changes that
> > will be going upstream to the Linux kernel at some point, right?  Or are
> > already there?  And nothing U-Boot specific?
> 
> More the other way around.  I replaced the u-boot ones with the files
> from linux, so there should be nothing u-boot specific anymore if there
> was at all.  Is that approach incorrect?

No, that's what I wanted to hear, thanks!

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20170601/c4b7a636/attachment.sig>