From: Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Sricharan R <sricharan-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
okaya-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org,
frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
tn-nYOzD4b6Jr9Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
magnus.damm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org,
linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
j.neuschaefer-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org,
robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 11:27:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530092759.GC2818@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1495544493-14219-1-git-send-email-sricharan-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 06:31:29PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> Now with IOMMU probe deferral, we return -EPROBE_DEFER
> for masters that are connected to an IOMMU which is not
> probed yet, but going to get probed, so that we can attach
> the correct dma_ops. So while trying to defer the probe of
> the master, check if the of_iommu node that it is connected
> to is marked in DT as 'status=disabled', then the IOMMU is never
> is going to get probed. So simply return NULL and let the master
> work without an IOMMU.
>
> Fixes: 7b07cbefb68d ("iommu: of: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error")
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
> Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> Tested-by: Magnus Damn <magnus.damn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Applied all to iommu/fixes, thanks.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
Cc: robin.murphy@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, tn@semihalf.com,
hanjun.guo@linaro.org, okaya@codeaurora.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
frowand.list@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
arnd@arndb.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, j.neuschaefer@gmx.net,
geert@linux-m68k.org, magnus.damm@gmail.com,
nwatters@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 11:27:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530092759.GC2818@8bytes.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20170530092759.bqGEuaF4MJciBgldVDfT9ShpiL-j-Cp2GUPkNlj-Haw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1495544493-14219-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 06:31:29PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> Now with IOMMU probe deferral, we return -EPROBE_DEFER
> for masters that are connected to an IOMMU which is not
> probed yet, but going to get probed, so that we can attach
> the correct dma_ops. So while trying to defer the probe of
> the master, check if the of_iommu node that it is connected
> to is marked in DT as 'status=disabled', then the IOMMU is never
> is going to get probed. So simply return NULL and let the master
> work without an IOMMU.
>
> Fixes: 7b07cbefb68d ("iommu: of: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error")
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Magnus Damn <magnus.damn@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Applied all to iommu/fixes, thanks.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
okaya@codeaurora.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
frowand.list@gmail.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
tn@semihalf.com, magnus.damm@gmail.com,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, j.neuschaefer@gmx.net,
robh+dt@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
hanjun.guo@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
robin.murphy@arm.com, nwatters@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 11:27:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530092759.GC2818@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1495544493-14219-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 06:31:29PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> Now with IOMMU probe deferral, we return -EPROBE_DEFER
> for masters that are connected to an IOMMU which is not
> probed yet, but going to get probed, so that we can attach
> the correct dma_ops. So while trying to defer the probe of
> the master, check if the of_iommu node that it is connected
> to is marked in DT as 'status=disabled', then the IOMMU is never
> is going to get probed. So simply return NULL and let the master
> work without an IOMMU.
>
> Fixes: 7b07cbefb68d ("iommu: of: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error")
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Magnus Damn <magnus.damn@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Applied all to iommu/fixes, thanks.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: joro@8bytes.org (Joerg Roedel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/5] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 11:27:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530092759.GC2818@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1495544493-14219-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 06:31:29PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> Now with IOMMU probe deferral, we return -EPROBE_DEFER
> for masters that are connected to an IOMMU which is not
> probed yet, but going to get probed, so that we can attach
> the correct dma_ops. So while trying to defer the probe of
> the master, check if the of_iommu node that it is connected
> to is marked in DT as 'status=disabled', then the IOMMU is never
> is going to get probed. So simply return NULL and let the master
> work without an IOMMU.
>
> Fixes: 7b07cbefb68d ("iommu: of: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error")
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Magnus Damn <magnus.damn@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Applied all to iommu/fixes, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-30 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-23 13:01 [PATCH v5 1/5] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` Sricharan R
[not found] ` <1495544493-14219-1-git-send-email-sricharan-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-23 13:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] iommu: of: Ignore all errors except EPROBE_DEFER Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] ACPI/IORT: " Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] ARM: dma-mapping: Don't tear third-party mappings Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] ACPI/IORT: Move the check to get iommu_ops from translated fwspec Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` Sricharan R
2017-05-23 13:01 ` Sricharan R
2017-05-30 9:27 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2017-05-30 9:27 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER Joerg Roedel
2017-05-30 9:27 ` Joerg Roedel
2017-05-30 9:27 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170530092759.GC2818@8bytes.org \
--to=joro-zlv9swrftaidnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=j.neuschaefer-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=magnus.damm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=okaya-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sricharan-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tn-nYOzD4b6Jr9Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.