From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM64/ACPI: Fix BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY() macro implementation
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:35:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530113548.GG32289@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170526164002.30103-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 05:40:02PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> The BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY() macro checks if a GICC MADT entry passes
> muster from an ACPI specification standpoint. Current macro detects the
> MADT GICC entry length through ACPI firmware version (it changed from 76
> to 80 bytes in the transition from ACPI 5.1 to ACPI 6.0 specification)
> but always uses (erroneously) the ACPICA (latest) struct (ie struct
> acpi_madt_generic_interrupt - that is 80-bytes long) length to check if
> the current GICC entry memory record exceeds the MADT table end in
> memory as defined by the MADT table header itself, which may result in
> false negatives depending on the ACPI firmware version and how the MADT
> entries are laid out in memory (ie on ACPI 5.1 firmware MADT GICC
> entries are 76 bytes long, so by adding 80 to a GICC entry start address
> in memory the resulting address may well be past the actual MADT end,
> triggering a false negative).
>
> Fix the BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY() macro by reshuffling the condition checks
> and update them to always use the firmware version specific MADT GICC
> entry length in order to carry out boundary checks.
>
> Fixes: b6cfb277378e ("ACPI / ARM64: add BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY() macro")
> Reported-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Oh, nasty:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
I'm assuming Catalin will pick this up as a fix.
Will
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> index 0e99978..59cca1d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -23,9 +23,9 @@
> #define ACPI_MADT_GICC_LENGTH \
> (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision < 6 ? 76 : 80)
>
> -#define BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY(entry, end) \
> - (!(entry) || (unsigned long)(entry) + sizeof(*(entry)) > (end) || \
> - (entry)->header.length != ACPI_MADT_GICC_LENGTH)
> +#define BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY(entry, end) \
> + (!(entry) || (entry)->header.length != ACPI_MADT_GICC_LENGTH || \
> + (unsigned long)(entry) + ACPI_MADT_GICC_LENGTH > (end))
>
> /* Basic configuration for ACPI */
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> --
> 2.10.0
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM64/ACPI: Fix BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY() macro implementation
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:35:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530113548.GG32289@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170526164002.30103-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 05:40:02PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> The BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY() macro checks if a GICC MADT entry passes
> muster from an ACPI specification standpoint. Current macro detects the
> MADT GICC entry length through ACPI firmware version (it changed from 76
> to 80 bytes in the transition from ACPI 5.1 to ACPI 6.0 specification)
> but always uses (erroneously) the ACPICA (latest) struct (ie struct
> acpi_madt_generic_interrupt - that is 80-bytes long) length to check if
> the current GICC entry memory record exceeds the MADT table end in
> memory as defined by the MADT table header itself, which may result in
> false negatives depending on the ACPI firmware version and how the MADT
> entries are laid out in memory (ie on ACPI 5.1 firmware MADT GICC
> entries are 76 bytes long, so by adding 80 to a GICC entry start address
> in memory the resulting address may well be past the actual MADT end,
> triggering a false negative).
>
> Fix the BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY() macro by reshuffling the condition checks
> and update them to always use the firmware version specific MADT GICC
> entry length in order to carry out boundary checks.
>
> Fixes: b6cfb277378e ("ACPI / ARM64: add BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY() macro")
> Reported-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Oh, nasty:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
I'm assuming Catalin will pick this up as a fix.
Will
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> index 0e99978..59cca1d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -23,9 +23,9 @@
> #define ACPI_MADT_GICC_LENGTH \
> (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision < 6 ? 76 : 80)
>
> -#define BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY(entry, end) \
> - (!(entry) || (unsigned long)(entry) + sizeof(*(entry)) > (end) || \
> - (entry)->header.length != ACPI_MADT_GICC_LENGTH)
> +#define BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY(entry, end) \
> + (!(entry) || (entry)->header.length != ACPI_MADT_GICC_LENGTH || \
> + (unsigned long)(entry) + ACPI_MADT_GICC_LENGTH > (end))
>
> /* Basic configuration for ACPI */
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> --
> 2.10.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-30 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-26 16:40 [PATCH] ARM64/ACPI: Fix BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY() macro implementation Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-05-26 16:40 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-05-30 11:35 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-05-30 11:35 ` Will Deacon
2017-05-30 17:55 ` Al Stone
2017-05-30 17:55 ` Al Stone
2017-05-30 16:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-05-30 16:26 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170530113548.GG32289@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=ahs3@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.