From: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: mvebu: fix gpio bank registration when pwm is used
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 14:28:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530122848.2803-2-richard.genoud@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170530122848.2803-1-richard.genoud@gmail.com>
If more than one gpio bank has the "pwm" property, only one will be
registered successfully, all the others will fail with:
mvebu-gpio: probe of f1018140.gpio failed with error -17
That's because in alloc_pwms(), the chip->base (aka "int pwm"), was not
set (thus, ==0) ; and 0 is a meaningful start value in alloc_pwm().
What was intended is chip->base = -1.
Like that, the numbering will be done auto-magically
Tested on clearfog-pro (Marvell 88F6828)
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
index cdef2c78cb3b..4734923e11fd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
@@ -768,6 +768,7 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
mvpwm->chip.dev = dev;
mvpwm->chip.ops = &mvebu_pwm_ops;
mvpwm->chip.npwm = mvchip->chip.ngpio;
+ mvpwm->chip.base = -1;
spin_lock_init(&mvpwm->lock);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: richard.genoud@gmail.com (Richard Genoud)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: mvebu: fix gpio bank registration when pwm is used
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 14:28:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530122848.2803-2-richard.genoud@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170530122848.2803-1-richard.genoud@gmail.com>
If more than one gpio bank has the "pwm" property, only one will be
registered successfully, all the others will fail with:
mvebu-gpio: probe of f1018140.gpio failed with error -17
That's because in alloc_pwms(), the chip->base (aka "int pwm"), was not
set (thus, ==0) ; and 0 is a meaningful start value in alloc_pwm().
What was intended is chip->base = -1.
Like that, the numbering will be done auto-magically
Tested on clearfog-pro (Marvell 88F6828)
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
index cdef2c78cb3b..4734923e11fd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
@@ -768,6 +768,7 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
mvpwm->chip.dev = dev;
mvpwm->chip.ops = &mvebu_pwm_ops;
mvpwm->chip.npwm = mvchip->chip.ngpio;
+ mvpwm->chip.base = -1;
spin_lock_init(&mvpwm->lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-30 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-30 12:28 [PATCH 1/2] gpio: mvebu: fix blink counter register selection Richard Genoud
2017-05-30 12:28 ` Richard Genoud
2017-05-30 12:28 ` Richard Genoud [this message]
2017-05-30 12:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: mvebu: fix gpio bank registration when pwm is used Richard Genoud
2017-05-30 13:16 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-05-30 13:16 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-05-30 14:45 ` Richard Genoud
2017-05-30 14:45 ` Richard Genoud
2017-05-30 15:14 ` Ralph Sennhauser
2017-05-30 15:14 ` Ralph Sennhauser
2017-05-30 16:35 ` Richard Genoud
2017-05-30 16:35 ` Richard Genoud
2017-05-30 13:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: mvebu: fix blink counter register selection Gregory CLEMENT
2017-05-30 13:01 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-05-30 13:06 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-05-30 13:06 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-05-30 15:18 ` Ralph Sennhauser
2017-05-30 15:18 ` Ralph Sennhauser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170530122848.2803-2-richard.genoud@gmail.com \
--to=richard.genoud@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.