From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel-JPay3/Yim36HaxMnTkn67Xf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>,
kernel-team-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] mm, oom: introduce oom_kill_all_tasks option for memory cgroups
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 22:30:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170604193002.GB19980@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1496342115-3974-5-git-send-email-guro-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 07:35:12PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> This option defines whether a cgroup should be treated
> as a single entity by the OOM killer.
>
> If set, the OOM killer will compare the whole cgroup with other
> memory consumers (other cgroups and tasks in the root cgroup),
> and in case of an OOM will kill all belonging tasks.
>
> Disabled by default.
>
...
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -5265,6 +5292,12 @@ static struct cftype memory_files[] = {
> .write = memory_max_write,
> },
> {
> + .name = "oom_kill_all_tasks",
> + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,
> + .seq_show = memory_oom_kill_all_tasks_show,
> + .write = memory_oom_kill_all_tasks_write,
> + },
> + {
> .name = "events",
> .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,
> .file_offset = offsetof(struct mem_cgroup, events_file),
I don't really like the name of the new knob, but can't come up with
anything better :-( May be, drop '_tasks' suffix and call it just
'oom_kill_all'? Or perhaps we should emphasize the fact that this
cgroup is treated as a single entity by the OOM killer by calling it
'oom_entity' or 'oom_unit'? Dunno...
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
kernel-team@fb.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] mm, oom: introduce oom_kill_all_tasks option for memory cgroups
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 22:30:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170604193002.GB19980@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1496342115-3974-5-git-send-email-guro@fb.com>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 07:35:12PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> This option defines whether a cgroup should be treated
> as a single entity by the OOM killer.
>
> If set, the OOM killer will compare the whole cgroup with other
> memory consumers (other cgroups and tasks in the root cgroup),
> and in case of an OOM will kill all belonging tasks.
>
> Disabled by default.
>
...
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -5265,6 +5292,12 @@ static struct cftype memory_files[] = {
> .write = memory_max_write,
> },
> {
> + .name = "oom_kill_all_tasks",
> + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,
> + .seq_show = memory_oom_kill_all_tasks_show,
> + .write = memory_oom_kill_all_tasks_write,
> + },
> + {
> .name = "events",
> .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,
> .file_offset = offsetof(struct mem_cgroup, events_file),
I don't really like the name of the new knob, but can't come up with
anything better :-( May be, drop '_tasks' suffix and call it just
'oom_kill_all'? Or perhaps we should emphasize the fact that this
cgroup is treated as a single entity by the OOM killer by calling it
'oom_entity' or 'oom_unit'? Dunno...
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
kernel-team@fb.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] mm, oom: introduce oom_kill_all_tasks option for memory cgroups
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 22:30:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170604193002.GB19980@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1496342115-3974-5-git-send-email-guro@fb.com>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 07:35:12PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> This option defines whether a cgroup should be treated
> as a single entity by the OOM killer.
>
> If set, the OOM killer will compare the whole cgroup with other
> memory consumers (other cgroups and tasks in the root cgroup),
> and in case of an OOM will kill all belonging tasks.
>
> Disabled by default.
>
...
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -5265,6 +5292,12 @@ static struct cftype memory_files[] = {
> .write = memory_max_write,
> },
> {
> + .name = "oom_kill_all_tasks",
> + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,
> + .seq_show = memory_oom_kill_all_tasks_show,
> + .write = memory_oom_kill_all_tasks_write,
> + },
> + {
> .name = "events",
> .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,
> .file_offset = offsetof(struct mem_cgroup, events_file),
I don't really like the name of the new knob, but can't come up with
anything better :-( May be, drop '_tasks' suffix and call it just
'oom_kill_all'? Or perhaps we should emphasize the fact that this
cgroup is treated as a single entity by the OOM killer by calling it
'oom_entity' or 'oom_unit'? Dunno...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-04 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-01 18:35 [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] cgroup-aware OOM killer Roman Gushchin
2017-06-01 18:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] mm, oom: refactor select_bad_process() to take memcg as an argument Roman Gushchin
2017-06-01 18:35 ` Roman Gushchin
[not found] ` <1496342115-3974-2-git-send-email-guro-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-04 19:25 ` Vladimir Davydov
2017-06-04 19:25 ` Vladimir Davydov
2017-06-04 19:25 ` Vladimir Davydov
2017-06-04 22:50 ` David Rientjes
2017-06-04 22:50 ` David Rientjes
2017-06-06 16:20 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-06 16:20 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-06 20:42 ` David Rientjes
2017-06-06 20:42 ` David Rientjes
2017-06-08 15:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-08 15:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-08 15:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-01 18:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] mm, oom: split oom_kill_process() and export __oom_kill_process() Roman Gushchin
2017-06-01 18:35 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-01 18:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] mm, oom: export oom_evaluate_task() and select_bad_process() Roman Gushchin
2017-06-01 18:35 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-01 18:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] mm, oom: introduce oom_kill_all_tasks option for memory cgroups Roman Gushchin
2017-06-01 18:35 ` Roman Gushchin
[not found] ` <1496342115-3974-5-git-send-email-guro-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-04 19:30 ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2017-06-04 19:30 ` Vladimir Davydov
2017-06-04 19:30 ` Vladimir Davydov
[not found] ` <1496342115-3974-1-git-send-email-guro-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-01 18:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] mm, oom: introduce oom_score_adj " Roman Gushchin
2017-06-01 18:35 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-01 18:35 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-04 19:39 ` Vladimir Davydov
2017-06-04 19:39 ` Vladimir Davydov
2017-06-01 18:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/7] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer Roman Gushchin
2017-06-01 18:35 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-04 20:43 ` Vladimir Davydov
2017-06-04 20:43 ` Vladimir Davydov
2017-06-06 15:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-06 15:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-06 15:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-01 18:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] mm,oom,docs: describe the " Roman Gushchin
2017-06-01 18:35 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-09 16:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] " Michal Hocko
2017-06-22 17:10 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-23 13:43 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-23 18:39 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-06-26 11:55 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170604193002.GB19980@esperanza \
--to=vdavydov.dev-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=guro-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kernel-team-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel-JPay3/Yim36HaxMnTkn67Xf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.