From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: wmi: Fix printing info about WDG structure
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:29:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170609082902.GR4690@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170608151618.GE32509@fury>
On Thursday 08 June 2017 08:16:18 Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:49:22PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 27 May 2017 15:33:14 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> >
> > >> Okay, got it. But on your opinion does it make sense to do
> > >>
> > >> pr_info("\tobject_id: %2pE\n", g->object_id);
> > >>
> > >> instead?
> > >>
> > >> For ASCII it will go as is previously, otherwise escaping would be
> > >> done.
> > >
> > > Both is OK for me. Do you want to send a new patch with %2pE?
> >
> > To me it looks slightly cleaner.
>
> I don't want to let this one fall through the cracks. Pali, is a new one coming?
So.. which modifier to use? Andy already proposed two alternatives and
basically I'm fine all 3 which are in this thread.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-09 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-27 11:51 [PATCH] platform/x86: wmi: Fix printing info about WDG structure Pali Rohár
2017-05-27 13:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-05-27 13:17 ` Pali Rohár
2017-05-27 13:23 ` Pali Rohár
2017-05-27 13:33 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-05-27 20:48 ` Pali Rohár
2017-05-27 20:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-08 15:16 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-08 15:38 ` Joe Perches
2017-06-08 17:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-08 17:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-08 18:18 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-09 8:29 ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2017-06-09 9:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-10 10:57 ` [PATCH v2] " Pali Rohár
2017-06-10 11:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-13 16:52 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170609082902.GR4690@pali \
--to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.