All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com (Jarkko Sakkinen)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] tpm: Enable CLKRUN protocol for Braswell systems
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:50:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170612075001.56tayed7dmmk55hn@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5FFFAD06ADE1CA4381B3F0F7C6AF58289117D8@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 04:35:50PM +0000, Shaikh, Azhar wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jarkko Sakkinen [mailto:jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2017 4:14 AM
> > To: Shaikh, Azhar <azhar.shaikh@intel.com>
> > Cc: jgunthorpe at obsidianresearch.com; tpmdd-devel at lists.sourceforge.net;
> > linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-security-module at vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: Enable CLKRUN protocol for Braswell systems
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:46:33PM -0700, Azhar Shaikh wrote:
> > > To overcome a hardware limitation on Intel Braswell systems, disable
> > > CLKRUN protocol during TPM transactions and re-enable once the
> > > transaction is completed.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Azhar Shaikh <azhar.shaikh@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes from v1:
> > > - Add CONFIG_X86 around disable_lpc_clk_run () and
> > > enable_lpc_clk_run() to avoid
> > > - build breakage on architectures which do not implement
> > > kmap_atomic_pfn()
> > >
> > > Changes from v2:
> > > - Use ioremap()/iounmap() instead of
> > kmap_atomic_pfn()/kunmap_atomic()
> > > - Move is_bsw() and all macros from tpm.h to tpm_tis.c file.
> > > - Add the is_bsw() check in disable_lpc_clk_run() and
> > > enable_lpc_clk_run()
> > > - instead of adding it in each read/write API.
> > >
> > > Changes from v3:
> > > - Move the code under #ifdef CONFIG_X86 and create stub functions for
> > > everything else
> > > - Rename the functions disable_lpc_clk_run() ->
> > > tpm_platform_begin_xfer() and
> > > - enable_lpc_clk_run() -> tpm_platform_end_xfer()
> > > - Remove wmb()
> > 
> > The wrong parameter order in outb() is not worth of mentioning in your
> > opinion?
> > 
> 
> Oh yes! It is definitely worth mentioning. I forgot to mention that.
> Will definitely mention it in the changelog for the next version if any or will re send v4 with updated changelog for v3.
> 
> > Related.
> > 
> > I looked again the kmap version of the patch and still cannot figure out what
> > could be wrong. Obviously the wrong outb() cause unexpected behavior.
> > 
> > Do you have chances to grab klog from kmap version with correct outb?
> > 
> 
> I have not tried the kmap version with corrected outb(). Will give that a try.
> 
> > /Jarkko

Thank you!

/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: "Shaikh, Azhar" <azhar.shaikh@intel.com>
Cc: "jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com"
	<jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
	"tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: Enable CLKRUN protocol for Braswell systems
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:50:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170612075001.56tayed7dmmk55hn@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5FFFAD06ADE1CA4381B3F0F7C6AF58289117D8@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 04:35:50PM +0000, Shaikh, Azhar wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jarkko Sakkinen [mailto:jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2017 4:14 AM
> > To: Shaikh, Azhar <azhar.shaikh@intel.com>
> > Cc: jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com; tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: Enable CLKRUN protocol for Braswell systems
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:46:33PM -0700, Azhar Shaikh wrote:
> > > To overcome a hardware limitation on Intel Braswell systems, disable
> > > CLKRUN protocol during TPM transactions and re-enable once the
> > > transaction is completed.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Azhar Shaikh <azhar.shaikh@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes from v1:
> > > - Add CONFIG_X86 around disable_lpc_clk_run () and
> > > enable_lpc_clk_run() to avoid
> > > - build breakage on architectures which do not implement
> > > kmap_atomic_pfn()
> > >
> > > Changes from v2:
> > > - Use ioremap()/iounmap() instead of
> > kmap_atomic_pfn()/kunmap_atomic()
> > > - Move is_bsw() and all macros from tpm.h to tpm_tis.c file.
> > > - Add the is_bsw() check in disable_lpc_clk_run() and
> > > enable_lpc_clk_run()
> > > - instead of adding it in each read/write API.
> > >
> > > Changes from v3:
> > > - Move the code under #ifdef CONFIG_X86 and create stub functions for
> > > everything else
> > > - Rename the functions disable_lpc_clk_run() ->
> > > tpm_platform_begin_xfer() and
> > > - enable_lpc_clk_run() -> tpm_platform_end_xfer()
> > > - Remove wmb()
> > 
> > The wrong parameter order in outb() is not worth of mentioning in your
> > opinion?
> > 
> 
> Oh yes! It is definitely worth mentioning. I forgot to mention that.
> Will definitely mention it in the changelog for the next version if any or will re send v4 with updated changelog for v3.
> 
> > Related.
> > 
> > I looked again the kmap version of the patch and still cannot figure out what
> > could be wrong. Obviously the wrong outb() cause unexpected behavior.
> > 
> > Do you have chances to grab klog from kmap version with correct outb?
> > 
> 
> I have not tried the kmap version with corrected outb(). Will give that a try.
> 
> > /Jarkko

Thank you!

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-12  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-01 19:13 [PATCH] tpm: Enable CLKRUN protocol for Braswell systems Azhar Shaikh
2017-06-01 19:13 ` Azhar Shaikh
2017-06-01 23:56 ` kbuild test robot
2017-06-01 23:56   ` kbuild test robot
2017-06-01 23:56   ` kbuild test robot
2017-06-02  2:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Azhar Shaikh
2017-06-02  2:04   ` Azhar Shaikh
2017-06-05 13:32   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-05 13:32     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-05 13:32     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-05 18:42     ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-05 18:42       ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-06 17:13       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-06 17:13         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-07 21:23   ` [PATCH v3] " Azhar Shaikh
2017-06-07 21:23     ` Azhar Shaikh
2017-06-07 21:44     ` Alan Cox
2017-06-07 21:44       ` Alan Cox
2017-06-08  1:11       ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-08  1:11         ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-08 12:38         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-08 12:38           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-08 18:22         ` Alan Cox
2017-06-08 18:22           ` Alan Cox
2017-06-08 18:39           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-06-08 18:39             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-06-08 18:50             ` Alan Cox
2017-06-08 18:50               ` Alan Cox
2017-06-08 19:27               ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-08 19:27                 ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-10 11:06             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-10 11:06               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-08 19:02           ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-08 19:02             ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-08 23:46   ` [PATCH v4] " Azhar Shaikh
2017-06-08 23:46     ` Azhar Shaikh
2017-06-10 11:13     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-10 11:13       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-10 16:35       ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-10 16:35         ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-12  7:50         ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2017-06-12  7:50           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-14  0:51           ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-14  0:51             ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-14 14:46             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-14 14:46               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-14 17:17               ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-14 17:17                 ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-14 19:39   ` Azhar Shaikh
2017-06-14 19:39     ` Azhar Shaikh
2017-06-18 23:52     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-18 23:52       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-19  2:12       ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-19  2:12         ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-19  2:12         ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-06-19  2:17   ` [PATCH v5] " Azhar Shaikh
2017-06-19  2:17     ` Azhar Shaikh
2017-06-19 14:51     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-06-19 14:51       ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170612075001.56tayed7dmmk55hn@intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.