From: Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
jack-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org,
linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-btrfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-xfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org,
linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
adam.manzanares-Sjgp3cTcYWE@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10 v11] No wait AIO
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 23:14:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170613061431.GA11432@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58bbe95e-5a4a-4387-3a00-16ed2e861bd3-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 05:38:13PM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> We had FS_NOWAIT in filesystem type flags (in v3), but retracted it
> later in v4.
A per-fs flag is wrong as file_operation may have different
capabilities.
> I will work on adding FMODE_AIO_NOWAIT in the meantime.
If Al prefers that let's go with it for now. One other thing I'd
love is a supported flags field in struct file_operations that we
can compare the flags against. Al, does that sound good as well?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Goldwyn
---end quoted text---
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
jack@suse.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, adam.manzanares@wdc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10 v11] No wait AIO
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 23:14:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170613061431.GA11432@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58bbe95e-5a4a-4387-3a00-16ed2e861bd3@suse.de>
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 05:38:13PM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> We had FS_NOWAIT in filesystem type flags (in v3), but retracted it
> later in v4.
A per-fs flag is wrong as file_operation may have different
capabilities.
> I will work on adding FMODE_AIO_NOWAIT in the meantime.
If Al prefers that let's go with it for now. One other thing I'd
love is a supported flags field in struct file_operations that we
can compare the flags against. Al, does that sound good as well?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Goldwyn
---end quoted text---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-13 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-06 11:19 [PATCH 0/10 v11] No wait AIO Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 01/10] fs: Separate out kiocb flags setup based on RWF_* flags Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 02/10] fs: Introduce filemap_range_has_page() Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 03/10] fs: Use RWF_* flags for AIO operations Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 04/10] fs: Introduce RWF_NOWAIT Goldwyn Rodrigues
[not found] ` <20170606111939.27272-5-rgoldwyn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-10 5:27 ` Al Viro
2017-06-10 5:27 ` Al Viro
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 05/10] fs: return if direct write will trigger writeback Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 06/10] fs: Introduce IOMAP_NOWAIT Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: return on congested block device Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 08/10] ext4: nowait aio support Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 10/10] btrfs: " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-06-08 7:39 ` [PATCH 0/10 v11] No wait AIO Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-10 5:34 ` Al Viro
2017-06-12 22:38 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
[not found] ` <58bbe95e-5a4a-4387-3a00-16ed2e861bd3-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-13 6:14 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-06-13 6:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-15 11:11 ` Al Viro
2017-06-15 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170613061431.GA11432@infradead.org \
--to=hch-wegcikhe2lqwvfeawa7xhq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=adam.manzanares-Sjgp3cTcYWE@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jack-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-xfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rgoldwyn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=viro-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.