From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: Mario.Limonciello@dell.com
Cc: dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org, luto@kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 18:34:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201706171834.36487@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c466b978c72a4a49a08dd84e72103963@ausx13mpc120.AMER.DELL.COM>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 2228 bytes --]
On Friday 16 June 2017 18:33:54 Mario.Limonciello@dell.com wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Limonciello, Mario
> > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:16 AM
> > To: 'Pali Rohár' <pali.rohar@gmail.com>; Darren Hart
> > <dvhart@infradead.org> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>;
> > Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>;
> > platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] RFC: platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method
> > instance number
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Pali Rohár [mailto:pali.rohar@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 8:59 AM
> > > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>; Darren Hart
> > > <dvhart@infradead.org>
> > > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>; Andy Lutomirski
> >
> > <luto@kernel.org>;
> >
> > > platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method
> > > instance number
> > >
> > > Mario, are you able to check if instance number passed to
> > > wmi_evaluate_method in following dell WMI drivers is correct and
> > > should be really 1?
> > >
> > > I suspect that it should be zero, as instance number is indexed
> > > from zero.
> > >
> > > There is no comment in those dell WMI drivers why it is 1, nor
> > > what 1 means.
> > >
> > > Ideally it needs to be checked in ACPI byte code, MOF file and
> > > WDG dump.
> >
> > I think you're likely correct. I don't have a box that supports
> > alienware-wmi or dell-wmi-led.c handy at the current moment to
> > confirm this hypothesis though. I'll confirm this later.
> >
> > I didn't realize it was zero indexed when I wrote alienware-wmi,
> > and I'm guessing the author of dell-wmi-led didn't either.
> >
> > The reason it's probably working is the ACPI byte code isn't
> > actually checking the instance since most times _WDG will only
> > call out one instance.
>
> I confirmed you're correct. Switching instance over to 0 works
> properly on an ASM200 (supported by alienware-wmi).
Can you check what is the value in the instance_count in _WDG?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-17 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-27 11:55 [PATCH] RFC: platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number Pali Rohár
2017-06-10 19:15 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-13 16:49 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-13 18:04 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-13 18:42 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-14 15:46 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-14 20:39 ` Darren Hart
2017-06-15 13:59 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-15 15:16 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-15 15:16 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-16 16:33 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-16 16:33 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-17 16:34 ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2017-06-21 21:52 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-21 21:52 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-22 7:33 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-17 16:47 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-19 15:02 ` joeyli
2017-07-05 9:51 ` Pali Rohár
2017-07-05 19:30 ` David Airlie
2017-07-05 20:24 ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 15:35 ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 16:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-06 20:21 ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 15:42 ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 16:18 ` Hans de Goede
2017-08-06 20:16 ` Pali Rohár
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201706171834.36487@pali \
--to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=Mario.Limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.