All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@suse.com>,
	"Corentin Chary" <corentin.chary@gmail.com>,
	acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
	"Oleksij Rempel" <linux@rempel-privat.de>,
	"João Paulo Rechi Vita" <jprvita@gmail.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:51:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170705095113.GI2102@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201706171847.54407@pali>

On Saturday 17 June 2017 18:47:54 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > So problematic drivers which use instance=1 without any comments are:
> > 
> >   acer-wmi
> >   asus-wmi
> >   mxm-wmi
> 
> Adding authors & maintainers of those drivers in loop.

Hi!

Dell drivers and acer-wmi are fixed now. So only asus-wmi and mxm-wmi
needs to be investigated.

Adding more people who developed those drivers recently in loop. Can you
check if instance number is used correctly or not?

> WMI instance number is indexed from zero and therefore first instance
> number is 0, not 1. Can you check if for drivers and wmi functions
> (specified below) is really correct to use WMI instance number one?
> 
> In case in _WDG is specified for particular GUID that instance_count is
> 1, it means the only allowed instance number is 0 (first and the only
> one).
> 
> In some cases, when there is only one instance for WMI method, ACPI WMI
> bytecode does not check instance number, so any passed value is
> accepted by ACPI. But in current patch I'm trying to fix check for
> valid instance number based on instance_count information from _WDG.
> 
> So I need to know if nothing would be broken. And in case those driver
> issue invalid/incorrect instance number, they needs to be fixed.
> 
> Can you look at it? Simple look into _WDG dump should be enough... just
> check if instance number called from wmi driver is less then
> instance_count from _WDG.
> 
> On Wednesday 14 June 2017 17:46:54 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Function wmi_query_block:
> > 
> >   acer-wmi.c:
> >   instance=1 /* no comment why, guid=95764E09-FB56-4E83-B31A-37761F60994A */
> > 
>  
> > Function wmi_evaluate_method:
> > 
> >   acer-wmi.c:
> >   instance=1 /* no comment why, guid=67C3371D-95A3-4C37-BB61-DD47B491DAAB */
> >   instance=1 /* no comment why, guid=6AF4F258-B401-42FD-BE91-3D4AC2D7C0D3 */
> > 
> >   asus-wmi.c:
> >   instance=1 /* no comment why, guid=97845ED0-4E6D-11DE-8A39-0800200C9A66 */
> > 
> >   mxm-wmi.c:
> >   instance=1 /* no comment why, guid=F6CB5C3C-9CAE-4EBD-B577-931EA32A2CC0 */
> 

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-05  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-27 11:55 [PATCH] RFC: platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number Pali Rohár
2017-06-10 19:15 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-13 16:49   ` Darren Hart
2017-06-13 18:04     ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-13 18:42       ` Darren Hart
2017-06-14 15:46         ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-14 20:39           ` Darren Hart
2017-06-15 13:59           ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-15 15:16             ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-15 15:16               ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-16 16:33             ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-16 16:33               ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-17 16:34               ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-21 21:52                 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-21 21:52                   ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-22  7:33                   ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-17 16:47           ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-19 15:02             ` joeyli
2017-07-05  9:51             ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2017-07-05 19:30               ` David Airlie
2017-07-05 20:24                 ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 15:35                   ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 16:10                     ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-06 20:21                       ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 15:42           ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 16:18             ` Hans de Goede
2017-08-06 20:16               ` Pali Rohár

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170705095113.GI2102@pali \
    --to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=corentin.chary@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=jlee@suse.com \
    --cc=jprvita@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.