All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] perf: xgene: Add support for SoC PMU version 3
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 19:17:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170622181749.GF25967@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFHUOYz_WpYa9BhCnQ+ze5-mbM4pWSn84j_EyH0E16ZbAs43tQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:13:08AM -0700, Hoan Tran wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 11:02:26AM -0700, Hoan Tran wrote:
> > >  static inline void
> > > +xgene_pmu_write_counter64(struct xgene_pmu_dev *pmu_dev, int idx, u64 val)
> > > +{
> > > +     u32 cnt_lo, cnt_hi;
> > > +
> > > +     cnt_hi = upper_32_bits(val);
> > > +     cnt_lo = lower_32_bits(val);
> > > +
> > > +     /* v3 has 64-bit counter registers composed by 2 32-bit registers */
> > > +     xgene_pmu_write_counter32(pmu_dev, 2 * idx, cnt_lo);
> > > +     xgene_pmu_write_counter32(pmu_dev, 2 * idx + 1, cnt_hi);
> > > +}
> >
> > For this to be atomic, we need to disable the counters for the duration
> > of the IRQ handler, which we don't do today.
> >
> > Regardless, we should do that to ensure that groups are self-consistent.
> >
> > i.e. in xgene_pmu_isr() we should call ops->stop_counters() just after
> > taking the pmu lock, and we should call ops->start_counters() just
> > before releasing it.
> 
> Thanks for your comments. I'll fix them and send another version of
> patch set soon.

No need; I'm picking these up now, and I'll apply the fixups locally.

Thanks,
Mark.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Hoan Tran <hotran@apm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Tai Nguyen <ttnguyen@apm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Loc Ho <lho@apm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] perf: xgene: Add support for SoC PMU version 3
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 19:17:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170622181749.GF25967@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFHUOYz_WpYa9BhCnQ+ze5-mbM4pWSn84j_EyH0E16ZbAs43tQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:13:08AM -0700, Hoan Tran wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 11:02:26AM -0700, Hoan Tran wrote:
> > >  static inline void
> > > +xgene_pmu_write_counter64(struct xgene_pmu_dev *pmu_dev, int idx, u64 val)
> > > +{
> > > +     u32 cnt_lo, cnt_hi;
> > > +
> > > +     cnt_hi = upper_32_bits(val);
> > > +     cnt_lo = lower_32_bits(val);
> > > +
> > > +     /* v3 has 64-bit counter registers composed by 2 32-bit registers */
> > > +     xgene_pmu_write_counter32(pmu_dev, 2 * idx, cnt_lo);
> > > +     xgene_pmu_write_counter32(pmu_dev, 2 * idx + 1, cnt_hi);
> > > +}
> >
> > For this to be atomic, we need to disable the counters for the duration
> > of the IRQ handler, which we don't do today.
> >
> > Regardless, we should do that to ensure that groups are self-consistent.
> >
> > i.e. in xgene_pmu_isr() we should call ops->stop_counters() just after
> > taking the pmu lock, and we should call ops->start_counters() just
> > before releasing it.
> 
> Thanks for your comments. I'll fix them and send another version of
> patch set soon.

No need; I'm picking these up now, and I'll apply the fixups locally.

Thanks,
Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-22 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-06 18:02 [PATCH v3 0/3] perf: xgene: Add support for SoC PMU version 3 Hoan Tran
2017-06-06 18:02 ` Hoan Tran
2017-06-06 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] perf: xgene: Parse PMU subnode from the match table Hoan Tran
2017-06-06 18:02   ` Hoan Tran
2017-06-22 16:39   ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-22 16:39     ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-06 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] perf: xgene: Move PMU leaf functions into function pointer structure Hoan Tran
2017-06-06 18:02   ` Hoan Tran
2017-06-22 17:53   ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-22 17:53     ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-06 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] perf: xgene: Add support for SoC PMU version 3 Hoan Tran
2017-06-06 18:02   ` Hoan Tran
2017-06-22 17:52   ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-22 17:52     ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-22 18:13     ` Hoan Tran
2017-06-22 18:13       ` Hoan Tran
2017-06-22 18:17       ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-06-22 18:17         ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-22 18:29         ` Hoan Tran
2017-06-22 18:29           ` Hoan Tran
2017-06-22 18:18     ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-22 18:18       ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-22 18:28       ` Hoan Tran
2017-06-22 18:28         ` Hoan Tran
2017-06-20 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] " Hoan Tran
2017-06-20 18:45   ` Hoan Tran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170622181749.GF25967@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.