All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.bianconi@st.com,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: pressure: st_pressure_spi: add OF capability to st_pressure_spi
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 20:51:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170624205139.52cd341f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170622175742.25696-1-lorenzo.bianconi@st.com>

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 19:57:42 +0200
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com> wrote:

> Add device tree support for LPS22HB pressure sensor
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/pressure/st_pressure_spi.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/st_pressure_spi.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/st_pressure_spi.c
> index 550508025af1..6dde7cc3e999 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/st_pressure_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/st_pressure_spi.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,19 @@
>  #include <linux/iio/common/st_sensors_spi.h>
>  #include "st_pressure.h"
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static const struct of_device_id st_press_of_match[] = {
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "st,lps22hb-press",
Rob requested the other day that we don't do this sort
of naming.  That particular discussion was about a dual
chip package. Here as far as I can tell the lsp22hb is
only ever a simple pressure sensor.  Hence can we drop the
-press? 
If we need to have it for backwards compatibility then
perhaps both is the way to go with the press version clearly
marked as deprecated.
> +		.data = LPS22HB_PRESS_DEV_NAME,
> +	},
> +	{},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, st_press_of_match);
> +#else
> +#define st_press_of_match	NULL
> +#endif
> +
>  static int st_press_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  {
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> @@ -30,6 +43,8 @@ static int st_press_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  
>  	press_data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  
> +	st_sensors_of_name_probe(&spi->dev, st_press_of_match,
> +				 spi->modalias, sizeof(spi->modalias));
>  	st_sensors_spi_configure(indio_dev, spi, press_data);
>  
>  	err = st_press_common_probe(indio_dev);
> @@ -58,6 +73,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, st_press_id_table);
>  static struct spi_driver st_press_driver = {
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = "st-press-spi",
> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(st_press_of_match),
>  	},
>  	.probe = st_press_spi_probe,
>  	.remove = st_press_spi_remove,


      reply	other threads:[~2017-06-24 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-22 17:57 [PATCH] iio: pressure: st_pressure_spi: add OF capability to st_pressure_spi Lorenzo Bianconi
2017-06-24 19:51 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170624205139.52cd341f@kernel.org \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi@st.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.