From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pawel Osciak <pawel@osciak.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] [media] videobuf2-dc: Add support for cacheable MMAP
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 15:36:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170713133600.GA24748@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170713132153.GD31807@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 02:21:53PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> My conclusion of the dma_alloc_noncoherent() and dma_cache_sync() API
> when it was introduced is that it's basically a completely broken
> interface, and I've never seen any point to it. Maybe some of that is
> because it's badly documented - which in turn makes it badly designed
> (because there's no specification detailing what it's supposed to be
> doing.)
>
> I'd like to see that thing die...
It's not exactly the best interface ever, so any improvement is welcome.
I've posted a series to kill dma_alloc_noncoherent in favor of
dma_alloc_attrs a short while ago, and a big chunk of it should have
made it into 4.12. I plan to kill it off entirely for 4.13.
That leaves dma_cache_sync() - it's used by 6 drivers:
drivers/net/ethernet/i825xx/lasi_82596.c
drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
drivers/scsi/53c700.c
drivers/scsi/sgiwd93.c
drivers/sh/maple/maple.c
drivers/tty/serial/mpsc.c
Those are used on parisc, mips for a few old SGI systems, the SH
dreamcast and powerpc marvell mv64x60 devices.
So it shouldn't be too hard to figure out if they could be moved
to the normal dma_sync_* calls.
On parisc dma_cache_sync is equivalent to dma_sync_single_for_cpu,
so that should be fine.
On mips the implementation of dma_sync_single_for_cpu is a little
more complicated, but both dma_sync_single_for_cpu and dma_cache_sync
end up calling __dma_sync_virtual, so they look like the same in
the end as well.
On SH sync_single_for_device is implemented using dma_cache_sync,
and there is no dma_sync_single_for_cpu.
On powerpc both dma_sync_single_for_cpu and dma_sync_single_for_device
are implemented using the same primitive as dma_cache_sync.
In short: killing off dma_cache_sync and using the existing and
better defined syncing primitives looks entirely feasible.
I'll add it to my TODO list for 4.13.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pawel Osciak <pawel@osciak.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] [media] videobuf2-dc: Add support for cacheable MMAP
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:36:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170713133600.GA24748@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170713132153.GD31807@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 02:21:53PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> My conclusion of the dma_alloc_noncoherent() and dma_cache_sync() API
> when it was introduced is that it's basically a completely broken
> interface, and I've never seen any point to it. Maybe some of that is
> because it's badly documented - which in turn makes it badly designed
> (because there's no specification detailing what it's supposed to be
> doing.)
>
> I'd like to see that thing die...
It's not exactly the best interface ever, so any improvement is welcome.
I've posted a series to kill dma_alloc_noncoherent in favor of
dma_alloc_attrs a short while ago, and a big chunk of it should have
made it into 4.12. I plan to kill it off entirely for 4.13.
That leaves dma_cache_sync() - it's used by 6 drivers:
drivers/net/ethernet/i825xx/lasi_82596.c
drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
drivers/scsi/53c700.c
drivers/scsi/sgiwd93.c
drivers/sh/maple/maple.c
drivers/tty/serial/mpsc.c
Those are used on parisc, mips for a few old SGI systems, the SH
dreamcast and powerpc marvell mv64x60 devices.
So it shouldn't be too hard to figure out if they could be moved
to the normal dma_sync_* calls.
On parisc dma_cache_sync is equivalent to dma_sync_single_for_cpu,
so that should be fine.
On mips the implementation of dma_sync_single_for_cpu is a little
more complicated, but both dma_sync_single_for_cpu and dma_cache_sync
end up calling __dma_sync_virtual, so they look like the same in
the end as well.
On SH sync_single_for_device is implemented using dma_cache_sync,
and there is no dma_sync_single_for_cpu.
On powerpc both dma_sync_single_for_cpu and dma_sync_single_for_device
are implemented using the same primitive as dma_cache_sync.
In short: killing off dma_cache_sync and using the existing and
better defined syncing primitives looks entirely feasible.
I'll add it to my TODO list for 4.13.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-13 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20161026085228epcas3p3895ea279d5538750a3b1c59715ad3761@epcas3p3.samsung.com>
2016-10-26 8:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] [media] videobuf2-dc: Add support for cacheable MMAP Thierry Escande
2016-10-26 8:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] [media] videobuf2-dc: Move vb2_dc_get_base_sgt() above mmap callbacks Thierry Escande
2016-10-26 8:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] [media] videobuf2-dc: Support cacheable MMAP Thierry Escande
2018-09-17 14:41 ` Hans Verkuil
2018-09-18 9:41 ` Tomasz Figa
2017-07-03 9:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] [media] videobuf2-dc: Add support for " Marek Szyprowski
2017-07-05 17:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-07-13 11:13 ` Marek Szyprowski
2017-07-13 13:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-07-13 13:36 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-07-13 13:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170713133600.GA24748@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=pawel@osciak.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
--cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=thierry.escande@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.