Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] cpufreq: mediatek: Add support of cpufreq to MT2701/MT7623 SoC

[Jean Delvare <jdelvare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>]

On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:54:38 +0800, Eddie Huang wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 08:46 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > I am fine with both. Maybe don't resend for just that, mediatek
> > doesn't sound any bad.  
> 
> I am also fine with both. I think most people won't confuse about mtk
> and mediatek. I don't like send patches to just only change filenames
> and kconfig, especially kconfig modification will affect project
> defconfigs. My point is we shouldn't spend much time on this topic, and
> revisit filename when that driver need support new SoC, like this case.

I believe that being consistent is important, and I believe that
3-letter abbreviations are confusing. So in my ideal fantasy world, all
these drivers would be named *mediatek* and their config options would
be CONFIG_*MEDIATEK*. That being said, it's only my general opinion on
the topic. I'm not going to send any patch to rename any of these
drivers, as I have many tasks of higher priority on my own plate. And I
agree that renaming existing drivers does have a cost as well. So
whatever is decided is fine with me, really.

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html