From: Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com (Jonathan Cameron)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] iio: adc: stm32: add optional min-sample-time
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 23:06:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170724230606.00001044@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80041c76-4428-9330-6dcb-4ca0f718d2e3@st.com>
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:16:00 +0200
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> wrote:
> On 07/23/2017 01:00 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:35:32 +0200
> > Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> wrote:
> >
> >> STM32 ADC allows each channel to be sampled with a different sampling time,
> >> by setting SMPR registers. Basically, value depends on local electrical
> >> properties. Selecting correct value for sampling time highly depends on
> >> analog source impedance. There is a manual that may help in this process:
> >> 'How to get the best ADC accuracy in STM32...'
> >>
> >> This patch allows to configure min-sample-time via device tree, either for:
> >> - all channels at once:
> >> min-sample-time = <10000>; /* nanosecs */
> >>
> >> - independently for each channel (must match "st,adc-channels" list):
> >> st,adc-channels = <0 1>;
> >> min-sample-time = <5000 10000>; /* nanosecs */
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
> >
> > On question inline which may well just be down to me missing what
> > happens when you query index element 2 from a 1 element device tree
> > array.
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> I should probably comment on it, please see inline.
>
<snip>
> >> }
> >> @@ -1538,8 +1651,8 @@ static int stm32_adc_chan_of_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> >> struct property *prop;
> >> const __be32 *cur;
> >> struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
> >> - int scan_index = 0, num_channels;
> >> - u32 val;
> >> + int scan_index = 0, num_channels, ret;
> >> + u32 val, smp = 0;
> >>
> >> num_channels = of_property_count_u32_elems(node, "st,adc-channels");
> >> if (num_channels < 0 ||
> >> @@ -1548,6 +1661,13 @@ static int stm32_adc_chan_of_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> >> return num_channels < 0 ? num_channels : -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + /* Optional sample time is provided either for each, or all channels */
> >> + ret = of_property_count_u32_elems(node, "min-sample-time");
> >> + if (ret > 1 && ret != num_channels) {
> >> + dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "Invalid min-sample-time\n");
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> channels = devm_kcalloc(&indio_dev->dev, num_channels,
> >> sizeof(struct iio_chan_spec), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> if (!channels)
> >> @@ -1558,9 +1678,13 @@ static int stm32_adc_chan_of_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> >> dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "Invalid channel %d\n", val);
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >> +
> >> + of_property_read_u32_index(node, "min-sample-time", scan_index,
> >> + &smp);
> >> +
> > I might be missing something, but doesn't this fail for the single shared
> > value case?
>
> Yes, this fails in the single shared value case, with index >= 1.
> Rewinding... when index is 0, it picks up 1st (shared) value.
> Then fails for other index values.
>
> of_property_read_u32_index() documentation states out value remains
> untouched in case of error:
> /**
> * of_property_read_u32_index...
> [...]
> * The out_value is modified only if a valid u32 value can be decoded.
>
> This is what I use here (as far as I tested it, it worked like a charm).
> Do you wish I add a comment to describe this ?
Probably best or I'll forget sometime down the line and think it looks
crazy again ;)
Thanks for the explanation.
Jonathan
>
> Please let me know,
> Best Regards,
> Fabrice
>
> >> stm32_adc_chan_init_one(indio_dev, &channels[scan_index],
> >> &adc_info->channels[val],
> >> - scan_index);
> >> + scan_index, smp);
> >> scan_index++;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -1755,6 +1879,7 @@ static int stm32_adc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> .clk_required = true,
> >> .start_conv = stm32f4_adc_start_conv,
> >> .stop_conv = stm32f4_adc_stop_conv,
> >> + .smp_cycles = stm32f4_adc_smp_cycles,
> >> };
> >>
> >> static const struct stm32_adc_cfg stm32h7_adc_cfg = {
> >> @@ -1766,6 +1891,7 @@ static int stm32_adc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> .stop_conv = stm32h7_adc_stop_conv,
> >> .prepare = stm32h7_adc_prepare,
> >> .unprepare = stm32h7_adc_unprepare,
> >> + .smp_cycles = stm32h7_adc_smp_cycles,
> >> };
> >>
> >> static const struct of_device_id stm32_adc_of_match[] = {
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org,
mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
mcoquelin.stm32-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
alexandre.torgue-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org,
lars-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org,
knaack.h-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org,
pmeerw-jW+XmwGofnusTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org,
benjamin.gaignard-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
benjamin.gaignard-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org,
linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio: adc: stm32: add optional min-sample-time
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 23:06:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170724230606.00001044@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80041c76-4428-9330-6dcb-4ca0f718d2e3-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:16:00 +0200
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 07/23/2017 01:00 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:35:32 +0200
> > Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> >> STM32 ADC allows each channel to be sampled with a different sampling time,
> >> by setting SMPR registers. Basically, value depends on local electrical
> >> properties. Selecting correct value for sampling time highly depends on
> >> analog source impedance. There is a manual that may help in this process:
> >> 'How to get the best ADC accuracy in STM32...'
> >>
> >> This patch allows to configure min-sample-time via device tree, either for:
> >> - all channels at once:
> >> min-sample-time = <10000>; /* nanosecs */
> >>
> >> - independently for each channel (must match "st,adc-channels" list):
> >> st,adc-channels = <0 1>;
> >> min-sample-time = <5000 10000>; /* nanosecs */
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > On question inline which may well just be down to me missing what
> > happens when you query index element 2 from a 1 element device tree
> > array.
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> I should probably comment on it, please see inline.
>
<snip>
> >> }
> >> @@ -1538,8 +1651,8 @@ static int stm32_adc_chan_of_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> >> struct property *prop;
> >> const __be32 *cur;
> >> struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
> >> - int scan_index = 0, num_channels;
> >> - u32 val;
> >> + int scan_index = 0, num_channels, ret;
> >> + u32 val, smp = 0;
> >>
> >> num_channels = of_property_count_u32_elems(node, "st,adc-channels");
> >> if (num_channels < 0 ||
> >> @@ -1548,6 +1661,13 @@ static int stm32_adc_chan_of_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> >> return num_channels < 0 ? num_channels : -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + /* Optional sample time is provided either for each, or all channels */
> >> + ret = of_property_count_u32_elems(node, "min-sample-time");
> >> + if (ret > 1 && ret != num_channels) {
> >> + dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "Invalid min-sample-time\n");
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> channels = devm_kcalloc(&indio_dev->dev, num_channels,
> >> sizeof(struct iio_chan_spec), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> if (!channels)
> >> @@ -1558,9 +1678,13 @@ static int stm32_adc_chan_of_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> >> dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "Invalid channel %d\n", val);
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >> +
> >> + of_property_read_u32_index(node, "min-sample-time", scan_index,
> >> + &smp);
> >> +
> > I might be missing something, but doesn't this fail for the single shared
> > value case?
>
> Yes, this fails in the single shared value case, with index >= 1.
> Rewinding... when index is 0, it picks up 1st (shared) value.
> Then fails for other index values.
>
> of_property_read_u32_index() documentation states out value remains
> untouched in case of error:
> /**
> * of_property_read_u32_index...
> [...]
> * The out_value is modified only if a valid u32 value can be decoded.
>
> This is what I use here (as far as I tested it, it worked like a charm).
> Do you wish I add a comment to describe this ?
Probably best or I'll forget sometime down the line and think it looks
crazy again ;)
Thanks for the explanation.
Jonathan
>
> Please let me know,
> Best Regards,
> Fabrice
>
> >> stm32_adc_chan_init_one(indio_dev, &channels[scan_index],
> >> &adc_info->channels[val],
> >> - scan_index);
> >> + scan_index, smp);
> >> scan_index++;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -1755,6 +1879,7 @@ static int stm32_adc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> .clk_required = true,
> >> .start_conv = stm32f4_adc_start_conv,
> >> .stop_conv = stm32f4_adc_stop_conv,
> >> + .smp_cycles = stm32f4_adc_smp_cycles,
> >> };
> >>
> >> static const struct stm32_adc_cfg stm32h7_adc_cfg = {
> >> @@ -1766,6 +1891,7 @@ static int stm32_adc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> .stop_conv = stm32h7_adc_stop_conv,
> >> .prepare = stm32h7_adc_prepare,
> >> .unprepare = stm32h7_adc_unprepare,
> >> + .smp_cycles = stm32h7_adc_smp_cycles,
> >> };
> >>
> >> static const struct of_device_id stm32_adc_of_match[] = {
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
<linux@armlinux.org.uk>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
<lars@metafoo.de>, <knaack.h@gmx.de>, <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
<benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>, <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>,
<linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio: adc: stm32: add optional min-sample-time
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 23:06:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170724230606.00001044@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80041c76-4428-9330-6dcb-4ca0f718d2e3@st.com>
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:16:00 +0200
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> wrote:
> On 07/23/2017 01:00 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:35:32 +0200
> > Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> wrote:
> >
> >> STM32 ADC allows each channel to be sampled with a different sampling time,
> >> by setting SMPR registers. Basically, value depends on local electrical
> >> properties. Selecting correct value for sampling time highly depends on
> >> analog source impedance. There is a manual that may help in this process:
> >> 'How to get the best ADC accuracy in STM32...'
> >>
> >> This patch allows to configure min-sample-time via device tree, either for:
> >> - all channels at once:
> >> min-sample-time = <10000>; /* nanosecs */
> >>
> >> - independently for each channel (must match "st,adc-channels" list):
> >> st,adc-channels = <0 1>;
> >> min-sample-time = <5000 10000>; /* nanosecs */
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
> >
> > On question inline which may well just be down to me missing what
> > happens when you query index element 2 from a 1 element device tree
> > array.
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> I should probably comment on it, please see inline.
>
<snip>
> >> }
> >> @@ -1538,8 +1651,8 @@ static int stm32_adc_chan_of_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> >> struct property *prop;
> >> const __be32 *cur;
> >> struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
> >> - int scan_index = 0, num_channels;
> >> - u32 val;
> >> + int scan_index = 0, num_channels, ret;
> >> + u32 val, smp = 0;
> >>
> >> num_channels = of_property_count_u32_elems(node, "st,adc-channels");
> >> if (num_channels < 0 ||
> >> @@ -1548,6 +1661,13 @@ static int stm32_adc_chan_of_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> >> return num_channels < 0 ? num_channels : -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + /* Optional sample time is provided either for each, or all channels */
> >> + ret = of_property_count_u32_elems(node, "min-sample-time");
> >> + if (ret > 1 && ret != num_channels) {
> >> + dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "Invalid min-sample-time\n");
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> channels = devm_kcalloc(&indio_dev->dev, num_channels,
> >> sizeof(struct iio_chan_spec), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> if (!channels)
> >> @@ -1558,9 +1678,13 @@ static int stm32_adc_chan_of_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> >> dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "Invalid channel %d\n", val);
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >> +
> >> + of_property_read_u32_index(node, "min-sample-time", scan_index,
> >> + &smp);
> >> +
> > I might be missing something, but doesn't this fail for the single shared
> > value case?
>
> Yes, this fails in the single shared value case, with index >= 1.
> Rewinding... when index is 0, it picks up 1st (shared) value.
> Then fails for other index values.
>
> of_property_read_u32_index() documentation states out value remains
> untouched in case of error:
> /**
> * of_property_read_u32_index...
> [...]
> * The out_value is modified only if a valid u32 value can be decoded.
>
> This is what I use here (as far as I tested it, it worked like a charm).
> Do you wish I add a comment to describe this ?
Probably best or I'll forget sometime down the line and think it looks
crazy again ;)
Thanks for the explanation.
Jonathan
>
> Please let me know,
> Best Regards,
> Fabrice
>
> >> stm32_adc_chan_init_one(indio_dev, &channels[scan_index],
> >> &adc_info->channels[val],
> >> - scan_index);
> >> + scan_index, smp);
> >> scan_index++;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -1755,6 +1879,7 @@ static int stm32_adc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> .clk_required = true,
> >> .start_conv = stm32f4_adc_start_conv,
> >> .stop_conv = stm32f4_adc_stop_conv,
> >> + .smp_cycles = stm32f4_adc_smp_cycles,
> >> };
> >>
> >> static const struct stm32_adc_cfg stm32h7_adc_cfg = {
> >> @@ -1766,6 +1891,7 @@ static int stm32_adc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> .stop_conv = stm32h7_adc_stop_conv,
> >> .prepare = stm32h7_adc_prepare,
> >> .unprepare = stm32h7_adc_unprepare,
> >> + .smp_cycles = stm32h7_adc_smp_cycles,
> >> };
> >>
> >> static const struct of_device_id stm32_adc_of_match[] = {
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-24 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-18 12:35 [PATCH 0/3] Allow to tune sampling time on STM32 ADC Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-18 12:35 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-18 12:35 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-18 12:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] iio: adc: stm32: fix common clock rate Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-18 12:35 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-18 12:35 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-23 10:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-23 10:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-23 10:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-24 7:43 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-24 7:43 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-24 7:43 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-24 15:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-24 15:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-24 15:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-18 12:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: stm32: add optional min-sample-time Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-18 12:35 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-18 12:35 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-23 10:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-23 10:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-23 10:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-24 7:55 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-24 7:55 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-24 7:55 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-24 15:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-24 15:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-24 15:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-18 12:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] " Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-18 12:35 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-18 12:35 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-23 11:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-23 11:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-23 11:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-24 8:16 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-24 8:16 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-24 8:16 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2017-07-24 15:06 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2017-07-24 15:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-07-24 15:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170724230606.00001044@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.