From: Marcin Ciupak <marcin.s.ciupak@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH v2] staging: lustre: replace simple_strtoul with kstrtoint
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:59:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170727105900.GA21407@gentoo.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170414081631.GC16598@kroah.com>
I did test it and not everything works as expected. I
need to reconsider that change. Please drop this patch.
Thanks,
Marcin
P.S. Sorry for late (sic!) response.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:16:31AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:46:09PM +0100, Marcin Ciupak wrote:
> > Replace simple_strtoul with kstrtoint.
> > simple_strtoul is marked for obsoletion as reported by checkpatch.pl
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcin Ciupak <marcin.s.ciupak@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > -improving kstrtoint error handling
> > -updating commit message
> >
> > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
> > index 8e0d4b1d86dc..42858ee5b444 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
> > @@ -924,12 +924,20 @@ static int lmd_parse(char *options, struct lustre_mount_data *lmd)
> > lmd->lmd_flags |= LMD_FLG_ABORT_RECOV;
> > clear++;
> > } else if (strncmp(s1, "recovery_time_soft=", 19) == 0) {
> > - lmd->lmd_recovery_time_soft = max_t(int,
> > - simple_strtoul(s1 + 19, NULL, 10), time_min);
> > + int res;
> > +
> > + rc = kstrtoint(s1 + 19, 10, &res);
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto invalid;
> > + lmd->lmd_recovery_time_soft = max_t(int, res, time_min);
>
> Are you sure max_t is still needed here?
>
> And have you tested this change?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcin Ciupak <marcin.s.ciupak@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: lustre: replace simple_strtoul with kstrtoint
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:59:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170727105900.GA21407@gentoo.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170414081631.GC16598@kroah.com>
I did test it and not everything works as expected. I
need to reconsider that change. Please drop this patch.
Thanks,
Marcin
P.S. Sorry for late (sic!) response.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:16:31AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:46:09PM +0100, Marcin Ciupak wrote:
> > Replace simple_strtoul with kstrtoint.
> > simple_strtoul is marked for obsoletion as reported by checkpatch.pl
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcin Ciupak <marcin.s.ciupak@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > -improving kstrtoint error handling
> > -updating commit message
> >
> > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
> > index 8e0d4b1d86dc..42858ee5b444 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
> > @@ -924,12 +924,20 @@ static int lmd_parse(char *options, struct lustre_mount_data *lmd)
> > lmd->lmd_flags |= LMD_FLG_ABORT_RECOV;
> > clear++;
> > } else if (strncmp(s1, "recovery_time_soft=", 19) == 0) {
> > - lmd->lmd_recovery_time_soft = max_t(int,
> > - simple_strtoul(s1 + 19, NULL, 10), time_min);
> > + int res;
> > +
> > + rc = kstrtoint(s1 + 19, 10, &res);
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto invalid;
> > + lmd->lmd_recovery_time_soft = max_t(int, res, time_min);
>
> Are you sure max_t is still needed here?
>
> And have you tested this change?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-27 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-21 12:46 [PATCH v2] staging: lustre: replace simple_strtoul with kstrtoint Marcin Ciupak
2017-04-14 8:16 ` [lustre-devel] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-04-14 8:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-07-27 10:59 ` Marcin Ciupak [this message]
2017-07-27 10:59 ` Marcin Ciupak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170727105900.GA21407@gentoo.lan \
--to=marcin.s.ciupak@gmail.com \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.