All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] dma: bcm-sba-raid: Improve memory allocation in SBA RAID driver
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:43:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170728031342.GR3053@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAALAos_xYyvTBZB2C+tt7NvWz-4TX-mXDVJwGqhvN0FTy8QA-Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 09:42:33AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:06:39AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:

> >>  drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c | 439 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> >>  1 file changed, 226 insertions(+), 213 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
> >> index e41bbc7..6d15fed 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
> >> @@ -48,7 +48,8 @@
> >>
> >>  #include "dmaengine.h"
> >>
> >> -/* SBA command related defines */
> >> +/* ====== Driver macros and defines ===== */
> >
> > why this noise, seems unrelated to the change!
> 
> This is just minor beautification. Again, I will put this
> in separate patch.

Well you can't shove garlands under an unrelated change. By all means throw
the whole garden out there, but please as a separate patch

> 
> >
> >> +
> >>  #define SBA_TYPE_SHIFT                                       48
> >>  #define SBA_TYPE_MASK                                        GENMASK(1, 0)
> >>  #define SBA_TYPE_A                                   0x0
> >> @@ -82,39 +83,41 @@
> >>  #define SBA_CMD_WRITE_BUFFER                         0xc
> >>  #define SBA_CMD_GALOIS                                       0xe
> >>
> >> -/* Driver helper macros */
> >> +#define SBA_MAX_REQ_PER_MBOX_CHANNEL                 8192
> >> +
> >>  #define to_sba_request(tx)           \
> >>       container_of(tx, struct sba_request, tx)
> >>  #define to_sba_device(dchan)         \
> >>       container_of(dchan, struct sba_device, dma_chan)
> >>
> >> -enum sba_request_state {
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_FREE = 1,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ALLOCED = 2,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_PENDING = 3,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ACTIVE = 4,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_RECEIVED = 5,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED = 6,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ABORTED = 7,
> >> +/* ===== Driver data structures ===== */
> >> +
> >> +enum sba_request_flags {
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_FREE          = 0x001,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ALLOCED       = 0x002,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_PENDING       = 0x004,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ACTIVE        = 0x008,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_RECEIVED      = 0x010,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED     = 0x020,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ABORTED       = 0x040,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_MASK          = 0x0ff,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_FENCE               = 0x100,
> >
> > how does this help in mem alloctn?

??

-- 
~Vinod

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Anup Patel <anup.patel-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Dan Williams
	<dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Florian Fainelli
	<f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	Ray Jui <rjui-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux Kernel
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	Device Tree <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	BCM Kernel Feedback
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dma: bcm-sba-raid: Improve memory allocation in SBA RAID driver
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:43:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170728031342.GR3053@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAALAos_xYyvTBZB2C+tt7NvWz-4TX-mXDVJwGqhvN0FTy8QA-Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 09:42:33AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:06:39AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:

> >>  drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c | 439 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> >>  1 file changed, 226 insertions(+), 213 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
> >> index e41bbc7..6d15fed 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
> >> @@ -48,7 +48,8 @@
> >>
> >>  #include "dmaengine.h"
> >>
> >> -/* SBA command related defines */
> >> +/* ====== Driver macros and defines ===== */
> >
> > why this noise, seems unrelated to the change!
> 
> This is just minor beautification. Again, I will put this
> in separate patch.

Well you can't shove garlands under an unrelated change. By all means throw
the whole garden out there, but please as a separate patch

> 
> >
> >> +
> >>  #define SBA_TYPE_SHIFT                                       48
> >>  #define SBA_TYPE_MASK                                        GENMASK(1, 0)
> >>  #define SBA_TYPE_A                                   0x0
> >> @@ -82,39 +83,41 @@
> >>  #define SBA_CMD_WRITE_BUFFER                         0xc
> >>  #define SBA_CMD_GALOIS                                       0xe
> >>
> >> -/* Driver helper macros */
> >> +#define SBA_MAX_REQ_PER_MBOX_CHANNEL                 8192
> >> +
> >>  #define to_sba_request(tx)           \
> >>       container_of(tx, struct sba_request, tx)
> >>  #define to_sba_device(dchan)         \
> >>       container_of(dchan, struct sba_device, dma_chan)
> >>
> >> -enum sba_request_state {
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_FREE = 1,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ALLOCED = 2,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_PENDING = 3,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ACTIVE = 4,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_RECEIVED = 5,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED = 6,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ABORTED = 7,
> >> +/* ===== Driver data structures ===== */
> >> +
> >> +enum sba_request_flags {
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_FREE          = 0x001,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ALLOCED       = 0x002,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_PENDING       = 0x004,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ACTIVE        = 0x008,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_RECEIVED      = 0x010,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED     = 0x020,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ABORTED       = 0x040,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_MASK          = 0x0ff,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_FENCE               = 0x100,
> >
> > how does this help in mem alloctn?

??

-- 
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Anup Patel <anup.patel@broadcom.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Device Tree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dma: bcm-sba-raid: Improve memory allocation in SBA RAID driver
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:43:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170728031342.GR3053@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAALAos_xYyvTBZB2C+tt7NvWz-4TX-mXDVJwGqhvN0FTy8QA-Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 09:42:33AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:06:39AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:

> >>  drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c | 439 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> >>  1 file changed, 226 insertions(+), 213 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
> >> index e41bbc7..6d15fed 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
> >> @@ -48,7 +48,8 @@
> >>
> >>  #include "dmaengine.h"
> >>
> >> -/* SBA command related defines */
> >> +/* ====== Driver macros and defines ===== */
> >
> > why this noise, seems unrelated to the change!
> 
> This is just minor beautification. Again, I will put this
> in separate patch.

Well you can't shove garlands under an unrelated change. By all means throw
the whole garden out there, but please as a separate patch

> 
> >
> >> +
> >>  #define SBA_TYPE_SHIFT                                       48
> >>  #define SBA_TYPE_MASK                                        GENMASK(1, 0)
> >>  #define SBA_TYPE_A                                   0x0
> >> @@ -82,39 +83,41 @@
> >>  #define SBA_CMD_WRITE_BUFFER                         0xc
> >>  #define SBA_CMD_GALOIS                                       0xe
> >>
> >> -/* Driver helper macros */
> >> +#define SBA_MAX_REQ_PER_MBOX_CHANNEL                 8192
> >> +
> >>  #define to_sba_request(tx)           \
> >>       container_of(tx, struct sba_request, tx)
> >>  #define to_sba_device(dchan)         \
> >>       container_of(dchan, struct sba_device, dma_chan)
> >>
> >> -enum sba_request_state {
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_FREE = 1,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ALLOCED = 2,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_PENDING = 3,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ACTIVE = 4,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_RECEIVED = 5,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED = 6,
> >> -     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ABORTED = 7,
> >> +/* ===== Driver data structures ===== */
> >> +
> >> +enum sba_request_flags {
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_FREE          = 0x001,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ALLOCED       = 0x002,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_PENDING       = 0x004,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ACTIVE        = 0x008,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_RECEIVED      = 0x010,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED     = 0x020,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ABORTED       = 0x040,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_STATE_MASK          = 0x0ff,
> >> +     SBA_REQUEST_FENCE               = 0x100,
> >
> > how does this help in mem alloctn?

??

-- 
~Vinod

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-28  3:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-26  5:36 [PATCH 0/6] Broadcom SBA-RAID driver improvements Anup Patel
2017-07-26  5:36 ` Anup Patel
2017-07-26  5:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] dma: bcm-sba-raid: Improve memory allocation in SBA RAID driver Anup Patel
2017-07-26  5:36   ` Anup Patel
2017-07-26 17:09   ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-26 17:09     ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-26 17:09     ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-27  4:12     ` Anup Patel
2017-07-27  4:12       ` Anup Patel
2017-07-27  4:12       ` Anup Patel
2017-07-28  3:13       ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2017-07-28  3:13         ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-28  3:13         ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-28  3:46         ` Anup Patel
2017-07-28  3:46           ` Anup Patel
2017-07-28  3:46           ` Anup Patel
2017-07-26  5:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] dma: bcm-sba-raid: Peek mbox when we are left with no free requests Anup Patel
2017-07-26  5:36   ` Anup Patel
2017-07-26 17:10   ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-26 17:10     ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-26 17:10     ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-27  4:55     ` Anup Patel
2017-07-27  4:55       ` Anup Patel
2017-07-27  4:55       ` Anup Patel
2017-07-28  3:15       ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-28  3:15         ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-28  3:39         ` Anup Patel
2017-07-28  3:39           ` Anup Patel
2017-07-28  3:39           ` Anup Patel
2017-07-26  5:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] dma: bcm-sba-raid: pre-ack async tx descriptor Anup Patel
2017-07-26  5:36   ` Anup Patel
2017-07-26  5:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] dma: bcm-sba-raid: Break sba_process_deferred_requests() into two parts Anup Patel
2017-07-26  5:36   ` Anup Patel
2017-07-26 17:15   ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-26 17:15     ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-27  4:58     ` Anup Patel
2017-07-27  4:58       ` Anup Patel
2017-07-27  4:58       ` Anup Patel
2017-07-26  5:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] dma: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support Anup Patel
2017-07-26  5:36   ` Anup Patel
2017-07-26  5:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: dts: Add SBA-RAID DT nodes for Stingray SoC Anup Patel
2017-07-26  5:36   ` Anup Patel
2017-07-26  5:36   ` Anup Patel
2017-07-26 17:03 ` [PATCH 0/6] Broadcom SBA-RAID driver improvements Vinod Koul
2017-07-26 17:03   ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-26 17:03   ` Vinod Koul
2017-07-27  4:07   ` Anup Patel
2017-07-27  4:07     ` Anup Patel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170728031342.GR3053@localhost \
    --to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.