From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64/vdso: Support mremap() for vDSO
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 17:48:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170728164800.GD14170@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170726170737.21696-1-dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 08:07:37PM +0300, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> vDSO VMA address is saved in mm_context for the purpose of using
> restorer from vDSO page to return to userspace after signal handling.
>
> In Checkpoint Restore in Userspace (CRIU) project we place vDSO VMA
> on restore back to the place where it was on the dump.
> With the exception for x86 (where there is API to map vDSO with
> arch_prctl()), we move vDSO inherited from CRIU task to restoree
> position by mremap().
>
> CRIU does support arm64 architecture, but kernel doesn't update
> context.vdso pointer after mremap(). Which results in translation
> fault after signal handling on restored application:
> https://github.com/xemul/criu/issues/288
>
> Make vDSO code track the VMA address by supplying .mremap() fops
> the same way it's done for x86 and arm32 by:
> commit b059a453b1cf ("x86/vdso: Add mremap hook to vm_special_mapping")
> commit 280e87e98c09 ("ARM: 8683/1: ARM32: Support mremap() for sigpage/vDSO").
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
> Cc: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
> index e8f759f764f2..2d419006ad43 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
> @@ -110,12 +110,27 @@ int aarch32_setup_vectors_page(struct linux_binprm *bprm, int uses_interp)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
>
> +static int vdso_mremap(const struct vm_special_mapping *sm,
> + struct vm_area_struct *new_vma)
> +{
> + unsigned long new_size = new_vma->vm_end - new_vma->vm_start;
> + unsigned long vdso_size = vdso_end - vdso_start;
You might be able to use vdso_pages here, but it depends on my question
below.
> +
> + if (vdso_size != new_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + current->mm->context.vdso = (void *)new_vma->vm_start;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static struct vm_special_mapping vdso_spec[2] __ro_after_init = {
> {
> .name = "[vvar]",
> },
> {
> .name = "[vdso]",
> + .mremap = vdso_mremap,
Does this mean we move the vdso text, but not the data page? How does that
work?
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 0x7f454c46@gmail.com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>,
Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/vdso: Support mremap() for vDSO
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 17:48:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170728164800.GD14170@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170726170737.21696-1-dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 08:07:37PM +0300, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> vDSO VMA address is saved in mm_context for the purpose of using
> restorer from vDSO page to return to userspace after signal handling.
>
> In Checkpoint Restore in Userspace (CRIU) project we place vDSO VMA
> on restore back to the place where it was on the dump.
> With the exception for x86 (where there is API to map vDSO with
> arch_prctl()), we move vDSO inherited from CRIU task to restoree
> position by mremap().
>
> CRIU does support arm64 architecture, but kernel doesn't update
> context.vdso pointer after mremap(). Which results in translation
> fault after signal handling on restored application:
> https://github.com/xemul/criu/issues/288
>
> Make vDSO code track the VMA address by supplying .mremap() fops
> the same way it's done for x86 and arm32 by:
> commit b059a453b1cf ("x86/vdso: Add mremap hook to vm_special_mapping")
> commit 280e87e98c09 ("ARM: 8683/1: ARM32: Support mremap() for sigpage/vDSO").
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
> Cc: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
> index e8f759f764f2..2d419006ad43 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
> @@ -110,12 +110,27 @@ int aarch32_setup_vectors_page(struct linux_binprm *bprm, int uses_interp)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
>
> +static int vdso_mremap(const struct vm_special_mapping *sm,
> + struct vm_area_struct *new_vma)
> +{
> + unsigned long new_size = new_vma->vm_end - new_vma->vm_start;
> + unsigned long vdso_size = vdso_end - vdso_start;
You might be able to use vdso_pages here, but it depends on my question
below.
> +
> + if (vdso_size != new_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + current->mm->context.vdso = (void *)new_vma->vm_start;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static struct vm_special_mapping vdso_spec[2] __ro_after_init = {
> {
> .name = "[vvar]",
> },
> {
> .name = "[vdso]",
> + .mremap = vdso_mremap,
Does this mean we move the vdso text, but not the data page? How does that
work?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-28 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-26 17:07 [PATCH] arm64/vdso: Support mremap() for vDSO Dmitry Safonov
2017-07-26 17:07 ` Dmitry Safonov
2017-07-28 16:48 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-07-28 16:48 ` Will Deacon
2017-07-28 19:06 ` Dmitry Safonov
2017-07-28 19:06 ` Dmitry Safonov
2017-08-02 16:04 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-02 16:04 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-08 9:29 ` Dmitry Safonov
2017-08-08 9:29 ` Dmitry Safonov
2017-08-08 9:44 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-08 9:44 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-08 17:02 ` Dmitry Safonov
2017-08-08 17:02 ` Dmitry Safonov
2017-08-09 10:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-09 10:13 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170728164800.GD14170@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.