From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Subject: Re: mtd: nand: atmel: probe of Spansion S34ML02G1 fails
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 21:13:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170728211301.10d25227@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2274647.ublHvqEhgW@ada>
Le Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:15:25 +0200,
Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com> a écrit :
> Hello Boris,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 26. Juli 2017, 20:33:26 schrieb Boris Brezillon:
> > Okay, first thing to test: revert f9ce2eddf176 ("mtd: nand: atmel: Add
> > ->setup_data_interface() hooks"). You may have to revert other
> > commits to compile the driver.
> >
> > If it works, I'd like you to drop SMC timings in both situations (with
> > and without this commit).
> >
> > I'd also like to to dump NAND timings (those passed to
> > ->setup_data_interface()).
>
> So based on those three atmel-ebi patches from earlier this week I used
> the attached patch to dump the nand timings and smc settings before the
> get applied. clk mck runs at 132096000 Hz (slow_xtal 32768, main_xtal
> 18432000). Previously clock settings for NAND were set in (very old) U-
> Boot to this (double checked, Linux didn't touch it):
>
> U-Boot> md.l 0xffffef1c 1
> ffffef1c: 0001000a ....
> U-Boot> md.l 0xffffec30 4
> ffffec30: 00010001 03030303 00050005 00020003 ................
>
> So setup, pulse, cycle, tdf all to quite low number of clock cycles, but
> as far as I can tell this worked with all flash chips we had connected
> over the years.
>
> Now with the old Hynix flash chip, I get the following:
>
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: atmel_smc_nand_setup_data_interface(csline: 0, type: 0)
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tBERS_max: 0, tCCS_min: 500000, tPROG_max: 0, tR_max: 200000000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tALH_min: 20000, tADL_min: 400000, tALS_min: 50000, tAR_min: 25000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tCEA_max: 100000, tCEH_min: 20000, tCH_min: 20000, tCHZ_max: 100000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tCLH_min: 20000, tCLR_min: 20000, tCLS_min: 50000, tCOH_min: 0
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tCS_min: 70000, tDH_min: 20000, tDS_min: 40000, tFEAT_max: 1000000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tIR_min: 10000, tITC_max: 1000000, tRC_min: 100000, tREA_max: 40000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tREH_min: 30000, tRHOH_min: 0, tRHW_min: 200000, tRHZ_max: 200000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tRLOH_min: 0, tRP_min: 50000, tRR_min: 40000, tRST_max: 250000000000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tWB_max: 200000, tWC_min: 100000, tWH_min: 30000, tWHR_min: 120000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tWP_min: 50000, tWW_min: 100000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: smcconf: setup: 0x00000002, pulse: 0x0f080f08, cycle: 0x000f000f, timings: 0x88060483, mode: 0x001f0003
> nand: Could not find valid ONFI parameter page; aborting
> nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0xad, Chip ID: 0xda
> nand: Hynix NAND 256MiB 3,3V 8-bit
> nand: 256 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
>
> $ devmem 0xffffef1c
> 0x0001000A
> $ devmem 0xffffec30
> 0x00000002
> $ devmem 0xffffec34
> 0x0F080F08
> $ devmem 0xffffec38
> 0x000F000F
> $ devmem 0xffffec3c
> 0x001F0003
>
> To me those values look like some kind of defaults every nand chip should run with?
>
> The failing Spansion chip here:
>
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: atmel_smc_nand_setup_data_interface(csline: 0, type: 0)
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tBERS_max: 0, tCCS_min: 500000, tPROG_max: 0, tR_max: 200000000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tALH_min: 20000, tADL_min: 400000, tALS_min: 50000, tAR_min: 25000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tCEA_max: 100000, tCEH_min: 20000, tCH_min: 20000, tCHZ_max: 100000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tCLH_min: 20000, tCLR_min: 20000, tCLS_min: 50000, tCOH_min: 0
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tCS_min: 70000, tDH_min: 20000, tDS_min: 40000, tFEAT_max: 1000000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tIR_min: 10000, tITC_max: 1000000, tRC_min: 100000, tREA_max: 40000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tREH_min: 30000, tRHOH_min: 0, tRHW_min: 200000, tRHZ_max: 200000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tRLOH_min: 0, tRP_min: 50000, tRR_min: 40000, tRST_max: 250000000000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tWB_max: 200000, tWC_min: 100000, tWH_min: 30000, tWHR_min: 120000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tWP_min: 50000, tWW_min: 100000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: smcconf: setup: 0x00000002, pulse: 0x0f080f08, cycle: 0x000f000f, timings: 0x88060483, mode: 0x001f0003
> nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x01, Chip ID: 0xda
> nand: AMD/Spansion S34ML02G1
> nand: 256 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: atmel_smc_nand_setup_data_interface(csline: -1, type: 0)
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tBERS_max: 1410065408, tCCS_min: 100000, tPROG_max: 700000000, tR_max: 25000000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tALH_min: 5000, tADL_min: 400000, tALS_min: 10000, tAR_min: 10000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tCEA_max: 25000, tCEH_min: 20000, tCH_min: 5000, tCHZ_max: 30000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tCLH_min: 5000, tCLR_min: 10000, tCLS_min: 10000, tCOH_min: 15000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tCS_min: 20000, tDH_min: 5000, tDS_min: 10000, tFEAT_max: 1000000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tIR_min: 0, tITC_max: 1000000, tRC_min: 25000, tREA_max: 20000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tREH_min: 10000, tRHOH_min: 15000, tRHW_min: 100000, tRHZ_max: 100000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tRLOH_min: 5000, tRP_min: 12000, tRR_min: 20000, tRST_max: 500000000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tWB_max: 100000, tWC_min: 25000, tWH_min: 10000, tWHR_min: 80000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: tWP_min: 12000, tWW_min: 100000
> atmel-nand-controller 10000000.ebi:nand-controller: smcconf: setup: 0x00000001, pulse: 0x05020502, cycle: 0x00050005, timings: 0x88030282, mode: 0x001b0003
Hm, ok. It seems that we're accepting mode 4 even though the controller
is not supporting EDO mode which mandatory for mode 4 and 5.
Can you try with the following patch? Timings are expressed in picoseconds
and this test was testing against a value expressed in nanoseconds.
BTW, did you try to comment the line I pointed out yesterday? I'd like
to be sure this is a timing issue.
--->8---
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c
index d922a88e407f..2c8baa0c2c4e 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c
@@ -1201,7 +1201,7 @@ static int atmel_smc_nand_prepare_smcconf(struct atmel_nand *nand,
* tRC < 30ns implies EDO mode. This controller does not support this
* mode.
*/
- if (conf->timings.sdr.tRC_min < 30)
+ if (conf->timings.sdr.tRC_min < 30000)
return -ENOTSUPP;
atmel_smc_cs_conf_init(smcconf);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-28 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-25 9:26 mtd: nand: atmel: probe of Spansion S34ML02G1 fails Alexander Dahl
2017-07-25 18:54 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-07-26 8:15 ` Alexander Dahl
2017-07-26 18:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-07-26 20:40 ` Alexander Dahl
2017-07-27 19:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-07-31 6:13 ` Alexander Dahl
2017-07-28 13:15 ` Alexander Dahl
2017-07-28 19:13 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-07-31 6:29 ` Alexander Dahl
2017-07-31 7:44 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-07-31 8:41 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170728211301.10d25227@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=ada@thorsis.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.