All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* version number of Linux kernel development
@ 2017-08-01  4:35 ` Yubin Ruan
  2017-08-01 10:06   ` Kamil Konieczny
  2017-08-01 12:19   ` Kamil Konieczny
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yubin Ruan @ 2017-08-01  4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernelnewbies

Hi, 
I got a question regarding to Linux's version number. According to some talk
from Greg KH, there would be an accompanying stable release along with every
-rc release, that is, something like this:

         4.2.0
          |       \
    4.3.1-rc    4.2.1
          |        |
    4.3.2-rc     4.2.2
          |        |
    4.3.3-rc     4.2.3
          |        |
    4.3.4-rc     4.2.4
          |        |
    4.3.5-rc     4.2.5
          |        |
    4.3.6-rc     4.2.6
          |        |
    4.3.7-rc     4.2.7   <- this branch is thrown away after 4.4.0 is released
          |
    4.4.0

So, in this example, 4.2.7 would be thrown away after 4.4.0 is released. Is
this the same for every major release?

I see a series of 4.4.x release, ranging from 4.4.1 ~ 4.4.49,@
    http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source
which really confused me. Accoding to the model above, there should be only
4.4.7. After that, it would 4.5.x.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Thanks,
Yubin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* version number of Linux kernel development
  2017-08-01  4:35 ` version number of Linux kernel development Yubin Ruan
@ 2017-08-01 10:06   ` Kamil Konieczny
  2017-08-01 12:19   ` Kamil Konieczny
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kamil Konieczny @ 2017-08-01 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernelnewbies



On 01.08.2017 06:35, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> Hi, 
> I got a question regarding to Linux's version number. [...]

> So, in this example, 4.2.7 would be thrown away after 4.4.0 is released. Is
> this the same for every major release?
> 
> I see a series of 4.4.x release, ranging from 4.4.1 ~ 4.4.49, at 
>     http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source
> which really confused me. Accoding to the model above, there should be only
> 4.4.7. After that, it would 4.5.x.

Look at https://www.kernel.org/

there are "longterm" branches, they are developed until EOL (end-of-life)

for example, there is now 4.4.79 branch

as i see this, some branches are selected to be "longterm",
and they get the same set patches

-- 
Best regards,
Kamil Konieczny
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* version number of Linux kernel development
  2017-08-01  4:35 ` version number of Linux kernel development Yubin Ruan
  2017-08-01 10:06   ` Kamil Konieczny
@ 2017-08-01 12:19   ` Kamil Konieczny
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kamil Konieczny @ 2017-08-01 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernelnewbies

Hi,

On 01.08.2017 06:35, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> Hi, 
> [...]
> 
> So, in this example, 4.2.7 would be thrown away after 4.4.0 is released. Is
> this the same for every major release? [...]

see also https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html

-- 
Best regards,
Kamil Konieczny
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-08-01 12:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <CGME20170801085256epcas4p4f0fcef4762795962ead0dbd69a341472@epcas4p4.samsung.com>
2017-08-01  4:35 ` version number of Linux kernel development Yubin Ruan
2017-08-01 10:06   ` Kamil Konieczny
2017-08-01 12:19   ` Kamil Konieczny

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.