All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	kernel-team <kernel-team@lge.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: fix KSM data corruption
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 09:58:13 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170802005813.GC6388@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FB5683EF-3972-46F0-BD14-F64B08D5E3AA@gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 12:21:41PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
> Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Nadav reported KSM can corrupt the user data by the TLB batching race[1].
> > That means data user written can be lost.
> > 
> > Quote from Nadav Amit
> > "
> > For this race we need 4 CPUs:
> > 
> > CPU0: Caches a writable and dirty PTE entry, and uses the stale value for
> > write later.
> > 
> > CPU1: Runs madvise_free on the range that includes the PTE. It would clear
> > the dirty-bit. It batches TLB flushes.
> > 
> > CPU2: Writes 4 to /proc/PID/clear_refs , clearing the PTEs soft-dirty. We
> > care about the fact that it clears the PTE write-bit, and of course, batches
> > TLB flushes.
> > 
> > CPU3: Runs KSM. Our purpose is to pass the following test in
> > write_protect_page():
> > 
> > 	if (pte_write(*pvmw.pte) || pte_dirty(*pvmw.pte) ||
> > 	    (pte_protnone(*pvmw.pte) && pte_savedwrite(*pvmw.pte)))
> > 
> > Since it will avoid TLB flush. And we want to do it while the PTE is stale.
> > Later, and before replacing the page, we would be able to change the page.
> > 
> > Note that all the operations the CPU1-3 perform canhappen in parallel since
> > they only acquire mmap_sem for read.
> > 
> > We start with two identical pages. Everything below regards the same
> > page/PTE.
> > 
> > CPU0		CPU1		CPU2		CPU3
> > ----		----		----		----
> > Write the same
> > value on page
> > 
> > [cache PTE as
> > dirty in TLB]
> > 
> > 		MADV_FREE
> > 		pte_mkclean()
> > 
> > 				4 > clear_refs
> > 				pte_wrprotect()
> > 
> > 						write_protect_page()
> > 						[ success, no flush ]
> > 
> > 						pages_indentical()
> > 						[ ok ]
> > 
> > Write to page
> > different value
> > 
> > [Ok, using stale
> > PTE]
> > 
> > 						replace_page()
> > 
> > Later, CPU1, CPU2 and CPU3 would flush the TLB, but that is too late. CPU0
> > already wrote on the page, but KSM ignored this write, and it got lost.
> > "
> > 
> > In above scenario, MADV_FREE is fixed by changing TLB batching API
> > including [set|clear]_tlb_flush_pending. Remained thing is soft-dirty part.
> > 
> > This patch changes soft-dirty uses TLB batching API instead of flush_tlb_mm
> > and KSM checks pending TLB flush by using mm_tlb_flush_pending so that
> > it will flush TLB to avoid data lost if there are other parallel threads
> > pending TLB flush.
> > 
> > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/BD3A0EBE-ECF4-41D4-87FA-C755EA9AB6BD@gmail.com
> > 
> > Note:
> > I failed to reproduce this problem through Nadav's test program which
> > need to tune timing in my system speed so didn't confirm it work.
> > Nadav, Could you test this patch on your test machine?
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> > Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> > Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 4 +++-
> > mm/ksm.c           | 3 ++-
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > index 9782dedeead7..58ef3a6abbc0 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > @@ -1018,6 +1018,7 @@ static ssize_t clear_refs_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> > 	enum clear_refs_types type;
> > 	int itype;
> > 	int rv;
> > +	struct mmu_gather tlb;
> > 
> > 	memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(buffer));
> > 	if (count > sizeof(buffer) - 1)
> > @@ -1062,6 +1063,7 @@ static ssize_t clear_refs_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> > 		}
> > 
> > 		down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > +		tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, 0, -1);
> > 		if (type == CLEAR_REFS_SOFT_DIRTY) {
> > 			for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
> > 				if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SOFTDIRTY))
> > @@ -1083,7 +1085,7 @@ static ssize_t clear_refs_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> > 		walk_page_range(0, mm->highest_vm_end, &clear_refs_walk);
> > 		if (type == CLEAR_REFS_SOFT_DIRTY)
> > 			mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, 0, -1);
> > -		flush_tlb_mm(mm);
> > +		tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, 0, -1);
> > 		up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > out_mm:
> > 		mmput(mm);
> > diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
> > index 0c927e36a639..15dd7415f7b3 100644
> > --- a/mm/ksm.c
> > +++ b/mm/ksm.c
> > @@ -1038,7 +1038,8 @@ static int write_protect_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
> > 		goto out_unlock;
> > 
> > 	if (pte_write(*pvmw.pte) || pte_dirty(*pvmw.pte) ||
> > -	    (pte_protnone(*pvmw.pte) && pte_savedwrite(*pvmw.pte))) {
> > +	    (pte_protnone(*pvmw.pte) && pte_savedwrite(*pvmw.pte)) ||
> > +						mm_tlb_flush_pending(mm)) {
> > 		pte_t entry;
> > 
> > 		swapped = PageSwapCache(page);
> > -- 
> > 2.7.4
> 
> I tested the patch-set, and my PoC does not fail anymore.

Thanks for the testing with great reproduing application, Nadav!

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	kernel-team <kernel-team@lge.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: fix KSM data corruption
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 09:58:13 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170802005813.GC6388@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FB5683EF-3972-46F0-BD14-F64B08D5E3AA@gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 12:21:41PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
> Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Nadav reported KSM can corrupt the user data by the TLB batching race[1].
> > That means data user written can be lost.
> > 
> > Quote from Nadav Amit
> > "
> > For this race we need 4 CPUs:
> > 
> > CPU0: Caches a writable and dirty PTE entry, and uses the stale value for
> > write later.
> > 
> > CPU1: Runs madvise_free on the range that includes the PTE. It would clear
> > the dirty-bit. It batches TLB flushes.
> > 
> > CPU2: Writes 4 to /proc/PID/clear_refs , clearing the PTEs soft-dirty. We
> > care about the fact that it clears the PTE write-bit, and of course, batches
> > TLB flushes.
> > 
> > CPU3: Runs KSM. Our purpose is to pass the following test in
> > write_protect_page():
> > 
> > 	if (pte_write(*pvmw.pte) || pte_dirty(*pvmw.pte) ||
> > 	    (pte_protnone(*pvmw.pte) && pte_savedwrite(*pvmw.pte)))
> > 
> > Since it will avoid TLB flush. And we want to do it while the PTE is stale.
> > Later, and before replacing the page, we would be able to change the page.
> > 
> > Note that all the operations the CPU1-3 perform canhappen in parallel since
> > they only acquire mmap_sem for read.
> > 
> > We start with two identical pages. Everything below regards the same
> > page/PTE.
> > 
> > CPU0		CPU1		CPU2		CPU3
> > ----		----		----		----
> > Write the same
> > value on page
> > 
> > [cache PTE as
> > dirty in TLB]
> > 
> > 		MADV_FREE
> > 		pte_mkclean()
> > 
> > 				4 > clear_refs
> > 				pte_wrprotect()
> > 
> > 						write_protect_page()
> > 						[ success, no flush ]
> > 
> > 						pages_indentical()
> > 						[ ok ]
> > 
> > Write to page
> > different value
> > 
> > [Ok, using stale
> > PTE]
> > 
> > 						replace_page()
> > 
> > Later, CPU1, CPU2 and CPU3 would flush the TLB, but that is too late. CPU0
> > already wrote on the page, but KSM ignored this write, and it got lost.
> > "
> > 
> > In above scenario, MADV_FREE is fixed by changing TLB batching API
> > including [set|clear]_tlb_flush_pending. Remained thing is soft-dirty part.
> > 
> > This patch changes soft-dirty uses TLB batching API instead of flush_tlb_mm
> > and KSM checks pending TLB flush by using mm_tlb_flush_pending so that
> > it will flush TLB to avoid data lost if there are other parallel threads
> > pending TLB flush.
> > 
> > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/BD3A0EBE-ECF4-41D4-87FA-C755EA9AB6BD@gmail.com
> > 
> > Note:
> > I failed to reproduce this problem through Nadav's test program which
> > need to tune timing in my system speed so didn't confirm it work.
> > Nadav, Could you test this patch on your test machine?
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> > Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> > Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 4 +++-
> > mm/ksm.c           | 3 ++-
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > index 9782dedeead7..58ef3a6abbc0 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > @@ -1018,6 +1018,7 @@ static ssize_t clear_refs_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> > 	enum clear_refs_types type;
> > 	int itype;
> > 	int rv;
> > +	struct mmu_gather tlb;
> > 
> > 	memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(buffer));
> > 	if (count > sizeof(buffer) - 1)
> > @@ -1062,6 +1063,7 @@ static ssize_t clear_refs_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> > 		}
> > 
> > 		down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > +		tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, 0, -1);
> > 		if (type == CLEAR_REFS_SOFT_DIRTY) {
> > 			for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
> > 				if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SOFTDIRTY))
> > @@ -1083,7 +1085,7 @@ static ssize_t clear_refs_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> > 		walk_page_range(0, mm->highest_vm_end, &clear_refs_walk);
> > 		if (type == CLEAR_REFS_SOFT_DIRTY)
> > 			mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, 0, -1);
> > -		flush_tlb_mm(mm);
> > +		tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, 0, -1);
> > 		up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > out_mm:
> > 		mmput(mm);
> > diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
> > index 0c927e36a639..15dd7415f7b3 100644
> > --- a/mm/ksm.c
> > +++ b/mm/ksm.c
> > @@ -1038,7 +1038,8 @@ static int write_protect_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
> > 		goto out_unlock;
> > 
> > 	if (pte_write(*pvmw.pte) || pte_dirty(*pvmw.pte) ||
> > -	    (pte_protnone(*pvmw.pte) && pte_savedwrite(*pvmw.pte))) {
> > +	    (pte_protnone(*pvmw.pte) && pte_savedwrite(*pvmw.pte)) ||
> > +						mm_tlb_flush_pending(mm)) {
> > 		pte_t entry;
> > 
> > 		swapped = PageSwapCache(page);
> > -- 
> > 2.7.4
> 
> I tested the patch-set, and my PoC does not fail anymore.

Thanks for the testing with great reproduing application, Nadav!

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-02  0:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-01  5:56 [PATCH v2 0/4] fix several TLB batch races Minchan Kim
2017-08-01  5:56 ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-01  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: refactoring TLB gathering API Minchan Kim
2017-08-01  5:56   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-01 10:30   ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-01 10:30     ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-02  0:46     ` Nadav Amit
2017-08-02  0:46       ` Nadav Amit
2017-08-02  0:53       ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-02  0:53         ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-02  0:53         ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-02  0:56     ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-02  0:56       ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-01  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: make tlb_flush_pending global Minchan Kim
2017-08-01  5:56   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-01 10:31   ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-01 10:31     ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-01  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: fix MADV_[FREE|DONTNEED] TLB flush miss problem Minchan Kim
2017-08-01  5:56   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-01 10:59   ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-01 10:59     ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-01  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: fix KSM data corruption Minchan Kim
2017-08-01  5:56   ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-01 19:21   ` Nadav Amit
2017-08-01 19:21     ` Nadav Amit
2017-08-02  0:58     ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2017-08-02  0:58       ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-01 19:33   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-08-01 19:33     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-08-02  0:58     ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-02  0:58       ` Minchan Kim
2017-08-01 22:29 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] fix several TLB batch races Andrew Morton
2017-08-01 22:29   ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170802005813.GC6388@bbox \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.