All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf/aux: Make aux_{head, wakeup} ring_buffer members long
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:58:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170804145835.GB6780@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ini8uci6.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 01:28:01PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> writes:
> 
> > The aux_head and aux_wakeup members of struct ring_buffer are defined
> > using the local_t type, despite the fact that they are only accessed via
> > the perf_aux_output_* functions, which cannot race with each other for a
> > given ring buffer.
> >
> > This patch changes the type of the members to long, so we can avoid
> > using the local_* API where it isn't needed.
> 
> Thanks for digging this up! Some minor nits below.
> 
> > @@ -434,12 +434,12 @@ void perf_aux_output_end(struct perf_output_handle *handle, unsigned long size)
> >  		handle->aux_flags |= PERF_AUX_FLAG_OVERWRITE;
> >  
> >  		aux_head = handle->head;
> > -		local_set(&rb->aux_head, aux_head);
> > +		rb->aux_head = aux_head;
> >  	} else {
> >  		handle->aux_flags &= ~PERF_AUX_FLAG_OVERWRITE;
> >  
> > -		aux_head = local_read(&rb->aux_head);
> > -		local_add(size, &rb->aux_head);
> > +		aux_head = rb->aux_head;
> > +		rb->aux_head += size;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (size || handle->aux_flags) {
> > @@ -451,11 +451,11 @@ void perf_aux_output_end(struct perf_output_handle *handle, unsigned long size)
> >  		                     handle->aux_flags);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	aux_head = rb->user_page->aux_head = local_read(&rb->aux_head);
> > +	aux_head = rb->user_page->aux_head = rb->aux_head;
> >  
> > -	if (aux_head - local_read(&rb->aux_wakeup) >= rb->aux_watermark) {
> > +	if (aux_head - rb->aux_wakeup >= rb->aux_watermark) {
> 
> Can't we just do away with aux_head here:
> 
>   rb->user_page->aux_head = rb->aux_head;
>   if (rb->aux_head - rb->aux_wakeup >= rb->aux_watermark) { ...
> 
> ?
> 
> > @@ -485,14 +485,13 @@ int perf_aux_output_skip(struct perf_output_handle *handle, unsigned long size)
> >  	if (size > handle->size)
> >  		return -ENOSPC;
> >  
> > -	local_add(size, &rb->aux_head);
> > +	rb->aux_head += size;
> >  
> > -	aux_head = rb->user_page->aux_head = local_read(&rb->aux_head);
> > -	if (aux_head - local_read(&rb->aux_wakeup) >= rb->aux_watermark) {
> > +	aux_head = rb->user_page->aux_head = rb->aux_head;
> > +	if (aux_head - rb->aux_wakeup >= rb->aux_watermark) {
> >  		perf_output_wakeup(handle);
> > -		local_add(rb->aux_watermark, &rb->aux_wakeup);
> > -		handle->wakeup = local_read(&rb->aux_wakeup) +
> > -				 rb->aux_watermark;
> > +		rb->aux_wakeup += rb->aux_watermark;
> > +		handle->wakeup = rb->aux_wakeup + rb->aux_watermark;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	handle->head = aux_head;
> 
> And here I think we don't need aux_head at all.

Agreed on both counts. Will fix for v2.

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/aux: Make aux_{head,wakeup} ring_buffer members long
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:58:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170804145835.GB6780@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ini8uci6.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 01:28:01PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> writes:
> 
> > The aux_head and aux_wakeup members of struct ring_buffer are defined
> > using the local_t type, despite the fact that they are only accessed via
> > the perf_aux_output_* functions, which cannot race with each other for a
> > given ring buffer.
> >
> > This patch changes the type of the members to long, so we can avoid
> > using the local_* API where it isn't needed.
> 
> Thanks for digging this up! Some minor nits below.
> 
> > @@ -434,12 +434,12 @@ void perf_aux_output_end(struct perf_output_handle *handle, unsigned long size)
> >  		handle->aux_flags |= PERF_AUX_FLAG_OVERWRITE;
> >  
> >  		aux_head = handle->head;
> > -		local_set(&rb->aux_head, aux_head);
> > +		rb->aux_head = aux_head;
> >  	} else {
> >  		handle->aux_flags &= ~PERF_AUX_FLAG_OVERWRITE;
> >  
> > -		aux_head = local_read(&rb->aux_head);
> > -		local_add(size, &rb->aux_head);
> > +		aux_head = rb->aux_head;
> > +		rb->aux_head += size;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (size || handle->aux_flags) {
> > @@ -451,11 +451,11 @@ void perf_aux_output_end(struct perf_output_handle *handle, unsigned long size)
> >  		                     handle->aux_flags);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	aux_head = rb->user_page->aux_head = local_read(&rb->aux_head);
> > +	aux_head = rb->user_page->aux_head = rb->aux_head;
> >  
> > -	if (aux_head - local_read(&rb->aux_wakeup) >= rb->aux_watermark) {
> > +	if (aux_head - rb->aux_wakeup >= rb->aux_watermark) {
> 
> Can't we just do away with aux_head here:
> 
>   rb->user_page->aux_head = rb->aux_head;
>   if (rb->aux_head - rb->aux_wakeup >= rb->aux_watermark) { ...
> 
> ?
> 
> > @@ -485,14 +485,13 @@ int perf_aux_output_skip(struct perf_output_handle *handle, unsigned long size)
> >  	if (size > handle->size)
> >  		return -ENOSPC;
> >  
> > -	local_add(size, &rb->aux_head);
> > +	rb->aux_head += size;
> >  
> > -	aux_head = rb->user_page->aux_head = local_read(&rb->aux_head);
> > -	if (aux_head - local_read(&rb->aux_wakeup) >= rb->aux_watermark) {
> > +	aux_head = rb->user_page->aux_head = rb->aux_head;
> > +	if (aux_head - rb->aux_wakeup >= rb->aux_watermark) {
> >  		perf_output_wakeup(handle);
> > -		local_add(rb->aux_watermark, &rb->aux_wakeup);
> > -		handle->wakeup = local_read(&rb->aux_wakeup) +
> > -				 rb->aux_watermark;
> > +		rb->aux_wakeup += rb->aux_watermark;
> > +		handle->wakeup = rb->aux_wakeup + rb->aux_watermark;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	handle->head = aux_head;
> 
> And here I think we don't need aux_head at all.

Agreed on both counts. Will fix for v2.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-04 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-28 16:54 [PATCH 1/2] perf/aux: Make aux_{head, wakeup} ring_buffer members long Will Deacon
2017-07-28 16:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf/aux: Make aux_{head,wakeup} " Will Deacon
2017-07-28 16:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/aux: Ensure aux_wakeup represents most recent wakeup index Will Deacon
2017-07-28 16:54   ` Will Deacon
2017-07-31 10:02   ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-07-31 10:02     ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-04 14:42     ` Will Deacon
2017-08-04 14:42       ` Will Deacon
2017-07-31 10:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf/aux: Make aux_{head, wakeup} ring_buffer members long Alexander Shishkin
2017-07-31 10:28   ` [PATCH 1/2] perf/aux: Make aux_{head,wakeup} " Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-04 14:58   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-08-04 14:58     ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170804145835.GB6780@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.