All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Bradley Bolen <bradleybolen@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel panic on null pointer on page->mem_cgroup
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 12:21:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170808162122.GA14689@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170808010150.4155-1-bradleybolen@gmail.com>

Hi Jaegeuk and Bradley,

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:01:50PM -0400, Bradley Bolen wrote:
> I am getting a very similar error on v4.11 with an arm64 board.
> 
> I, too, also see page->mem_cgroup checked to make sure that it is not
> NULL and then several instructions later it is NULL.  It does appear
> that someone is changing that member without taking the lock.  In my
> setup, I see
> 
> crash> bt
> PID: 72     TASK: e1f48640  CPU: 0   COMMAND: "mmcqd/1"
>  #0 [<c00ad35c>] (__crash_kexec) from [<c0101080>]
>  #1 [<c0101080>] (panic) from [<c028cd6c>]
>  #2 [<c028cd6c>] (svcerr_panic) from [<c028cdc4>]
>  #3 [<c028cdc4>] (_SvcErr_) from [<c001474c>]
>  #4 [<c001474c>] (die) from [<c00241f8>]
>  #5 [<c00241f8>] (__do_kernel_fault) from [<c0560600>]
>  #6 [<c0560600>] (do_page_fault) from [<c00092e8>]
>  #7 [<c00092e8>] (do_DataAbort) from [<c055f9f0>]
>     pc : [<c0112540>]    lr : [<c0112518>]    psr: a0000193
>     sp : c1a19cc8  ip : 00000000  fp : c1a19d04
>     r10: 0006ae29  r9 : 00000000  r8 : dfbf1800
>     r7 : dfbf1800  r6 : 00000001  r5 : f3c1107c  r4 : e2fb6424
>     r3 : 00000000  r2 : 00040228  r1 : 221e3000  r0 : a0000113
>     Flags: NzCv  IRQs off  FIQs on  Mode SVC_32  ISA ARM
>  #8 [<c055f9f0>] (__dabt_svc) from [<c0112518>]
>  #9 [<c0112540>] (test_clear_page_writeback) from [<c01046d4>]
> #10 [<c01046d4>] (end_page_writeback) from [<c0149bcc>]
> #11 [<c0149bcc>] (end_swap_bio_write) from [<c0261460>]
> #12 [<c0261460>] (bio_endio) from [<c042c800>]
> #13 [<c042c800>] (dec_pending) from [<c042e648>]
> #14 [<c042e648>] (clone_endio) from [<c0261460>]
> #15 [<c0261460>] (bio_endio) from [<bf60aa00>]
> #16 [<bf60aa00>] (crypt_dec_pending [dm_crypt]) from [<bf60c1e8>]
> #17 [<bf60c1e8>] (crypt_endio [dm_crypt]) from [<c0261460>]
> #18 [<c0261460>] (bio_endio) from [<c0269e34>]
> #19 [<c0269e34>] (blk_update_request) from [<c026a058>]
> #20 [<c026a058>] (blk_update_bidi_request) from [<c026a444>]
> #21 [<c026a444>] (blk_end_bidi_request) from [<c026a494>]
> #22 [<c026a494>] (blk_end_request) from [<c0458dbc>]
> #23 [<c0458dbc>] (mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq) from [<c0459e24>]
> #24 [<c0459e24>] (mmc_blk_issue_rq) from [<c045a018>]
> #25 [<c045a018>] (mmc_queue_thread) from [<c0048890>]
> #26 [<c0048890>] (kthread) from [<c0010388>]
> crash> sym c0112540
> c0112540 (T) test_clear_page_writeback+512
>  /kernel-source/include/linux/memcontrol.h: 518
> 
> crash> bt 35
> PID: 35     TASK: e1d45dc0  CPU: 1   COMMAND: "kswapd0"
>  #0 [<c0559ab8>] (__schedule) from [<c0559edc>]
>  #1 [<c0559edc>] (schedule) from [<c055e54c>]
>  #2 [<c055e54c>] (schedule_timeout) from [<c055a3a4>]
>  #3 [<c055a3a4>] (io_schedule_timeout) from [<c0106cb0>]
>  #4 [<c0106cb0>] (mempool_alloc) from [<c0261668>]
>  #5 [<c0261668>] (bio_alloc_bioset) from [<c0149d68>]
>  #6 [<c0149d68>] (get_swap_bio) from [<c014a280>]
>  #7 [<c014a280>] (__swap_writepage) from [<c014a3bc>]
>  #8 [<c014a3bc>] (swap_writepage) from [<c011e5c8>]
>  #9 [<c011e5c8>] (shmem_writepage) from [<c011a9b8>]
> #10 [<c011a9b8>] (shrink_page_list) from [<c011b528>]
> #11 [<c011b528>] (shrink_inactive_list) from [<c011c160>]
> #12 [<c011c160>] (shrink_node_memcg) from [<c011c400>]
> #13 [<c011c400>] (shrink_node) from [<c011d7dc>]
> #14 [<c011d7dc>] (kswapd) from [<c0048890>]
> #15 [<c0048890>] (kthread) from [<c0010388>]
> 
> It appears that uncharge_list() in mm/memcontrol.c is not taking the
> page lock when it sets mem_cgroup to NULL.  I am not familiar with the
> mm code so I do not know if this is on purpose or not.  There is a
> comment in uncharge_list that makes me believe that the crashing code
> should not have been running:
> /*
>  * Nobody should be changing or seriously looking at
>  * page->mem_cgroup at this point, we have fully
>  * exclusive access to the page.
>  */
> However, I am new to looking at this area of the kernel so I am not
> sure.

The lock is for pages that are actively being used, whereas the free
path requires the page refcount to be 0; nobody else should be having
access to the page at that time.

> I was able to create a reproducible scenario by using a udelay to
> increase the time between the if (page->mem_cgroup) check and the later
> dereference of it to increase the race window.  I then mounted an empty
> ext4 partition and ran the following no more than twice before it
> crashed.
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/ext4disk/test bs=1M count=100

Thanks, that's useful. I'm going to try to reproduce this also.

There is a

	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHWPoison(page) && page_count(page), page);

inside uncharge_list() that verifies that there shouldn't in fact be
any pages ending writeback when they get into that function. Can you
build your kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM to enable that test?

Thanks

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Bradley Bolen <bradleybolen@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel panic on null pointer on page->mem_cgroup
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 12:21:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170808162122.GA14689@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170808010150.4155-1-bradleybolen@gmail.com>

Hi Jaegeuk and Bradley,

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:01:50PM -0400, Bradley Bolen wrote:
> I am getting a very similar error on v4.11 with an arm64 board.
> 
> I, too, also see page->mem_cgroup checked to make sure that it is not
> NULL and then several instructions later it is NULL.  It does appear
> that someone is changing that member without taking the lock.  In my
> setup, I see
> 
> crash> bt
> PID: 72     TASK: e1f48640  CPU: 0   COMMAND: "mmcqd/1"
>  #0 [<c00ad35c>] (__crash_kexec) from [<c0101080>]
>  #1 [<c0101080>] (panic) from [<c028cd6c>]
>  #2 [<c028cd6c>] (svcerr_panic) from [<c028cdc4>]
>  #3 [<c028cdc4>] (_SvcErr_) from [<c001474c>]
>  #4 [<c001474c>] (die) from [<c00241f8>]
>  #5 [<c00241f8>] (__do_kernel_fault) from [<c0560600>]
>  #6 [<c0560600>] (do_page_fault) from [<c00092e8>]
>  #7 [<c00092e8>] (do_DataAbort) from [<c055f9f0>]
>     pc : [<c0112540>]    lr : [<c0112518>]    psr: a0000193
>     sp : c1a19cc8  ip : 00000000  fp : c1a19d04
>     r10: 0006ae29  r9 : 00000000  r8 : dfbf1800
>     r7 : dfbf1800  r6 : 00000001  r5 : f3c1107c  r4 : e2fb6424
>     r3 : 00000000  r2 : 00040228  r1 : 221e3000  r0 : a0000113
>     Flags: NzCv  IRQs off  FIQs on  Mode SVC_32  ISA ARM
>  #8 [<c055f9f0>] (__dabt_svc) from [<c0112518>]
>  #9 [<c0112540>] (test_clear_page_writeback) from [<c01046d4>]
> #10 [<c01046d4>] (end_page_writeback) from [<c0149bcc>]
> #11 [<c0149bcc>] (end_swap_bio_write) from [<c0261460>]
> #12 [<c0261460>] (bio_endio) from [<c042c800>]
> #13 [<c042c800>] (dec_pending) from [<c042e648>]
> #14 [<c042e648>] (clone_endio) from [<c0261460>]
> #15 [<c0261460>] (bio_endio) from [<bf60aa00>]
> #16 [<bf60aa00>] (crypt_dec_pending [dm_crypt]) from [<bf60c1e8>]
> #17 [<bf60c1e8>] (crypt_endio [dm_crypt]) from [<c0261460>]
> #18 [<c0261460>] (bio_endio) from [<c0269e34>]
> #19 [<c0269e34>] (blk_update_request) from [<c026a058>]
> #20 [<c026a058>] (blk_update_bidi_request) from [<c026a444>]
> #21 [<c026a444>] (blk_end_bidi_request) from [<c026a494>]
> #22 [<c026a494>] (blk_end_request) from [<c0458dbc>]
> #23 [<c0458dbc>] (mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq) from [<c0459e24>]
> #24 [<c0459e24>] (mmc_blk_issue_rq) from [<c045a018>]
> #25 [<c045a018>] (mmc_queue_thread) from [<c0048890>]
> #26 [<c0048890>] (kthread) from [<c0010388>]
> crash> sym c0112540
> c0112540 (T) test_clear_page_writeback+512
>  /kernel-source/include/linux/memcontrol.h: 518
> 
> crash> bt 35
> PID: 35     TASK: e1d45dc0  CPU: 1   COMMAND: "kswapd0"
>  #0 [<c0559ab8>] (__schedule) from [<c0559edc>]
>  #1 [<c0559edc>] (schedule) from [<c055e54c>]
>  #2 [<c055e54c>] (schedule_timeout) from [<c055a3a4>]
>  #3 [<c055a3a4>] (io_schedule_timeout) from [<c0106cb0>]
>  #4 [<c0106cb0>] (mempool_alloc) from [<c0261668>]
>  #5 [<c0261668>] (bio_alloc_bioset) from [<c0149d68>]
>  #6 [<c0149d68>] (get_swap_bio) from [<c014a280>]
>  #7 [<c014a280>] (__swap_writepage) from [<c014a3bc>]
>  #8 [<c014a3bc>] (swap_writepage) from [<c011e5c8>]
>  #9 [<c011e5c8>] (shmem_writepage) from [<c011a9b8>]
> #10 [<c011a9b8>] (shrink_page_list) from [<c011b528>]
> #11 [<c011b528>] (shrink_inactive_list) from [<c011c160>]
> #12 [<c011c160>] (shrink_node_memcg) from [<c011c400>]
> #13 [<c011c400>] (shrink_node) from [<c011d7dc>]
> #14 [<c011d7dc>] (kswapd) from [<c0048890>]
> #15 [<c0048890>] (kthread) from [<c0010388>]
> 
> It appears that uncharge_list() in mm/memcontrol.c is not taking the
> page lock when it sets mem_cgroup to NULL.  I am not familiar with the
> mm code so I do not know if this is on purpose or not.  There is a
> comment in uncharge_list that makes me believe that the crashing code
> should not have been running:
> /*
>  * Nobody should be changing or seriously looking at
>  * page->mem_cgroup at this point, we have fully
>  * exclusive access to the page.
>  */
> However, I am new to looking at this area of the kernel so I am not
> sure.

The lock is for pages that are actively being used, whereas the free
path requires the page refcount to be 0; nobody else should be having
access to the page at that time.

> I was able to create a reproducible scenario by using a udelay to
> increase the time between the if (page->mem_cgroup) check and the later
> dereference of it to increase the race window.  I then mounted an empty
> ext4 partition and ran the following no more than twice before it
> crashed.
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/ext4disk/test bs=1M count=100

Thanks, that's useful. I'm going to try to reproduce this also.

There is a

	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHWPoison(page) && page_count(page), page);

inside uncharge_list() that verifies that there shouldn't in fact be
any pages ending writeback when they get into that function. Can you
build your kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM to enable that test?

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-08 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-05 15:52 kernel panic on null pointer on page->mem_cgroup Jaegeuk Kim
2017-08-05 15:52 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-08-08  1:01 ` Bradley Bolen
2017-08-08 16:21   ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2017-08-08 16:21     ` Johannes Weiner
     [not found]     ` <20170808162122.GA14689-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-08 16:56       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-08-08 16:56         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-08-08 16:56         ` Jaegeuk Kim
     [not found]         ` <20170808165601.GA7693-Bkjb4tF/BptrGMd72DVhOyZ7yTyXFdtBkQQo+JxHRPFibQn6LdNjmg@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-08 17:37           ` Johannes Weiner
2017-08-08 17:37             ` Johannes Weiner
2017-08-08 17:37             ` Johannes Weiner
     [not found]             ` <20170808173704.GA22887-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-08 19:13               ` Brad Bolen
2017-08-08 19:13                 ` Brad Bolen
2017-08-08 19:13                 ` Brad Bolen
2017-08-08 20:08                 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-08-08 20:08                   ` Johannes Weiner
2017-08-09  1:44                   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-08-09  1:44                     ` Jaegeuk Kim
     [not found]                     ` <20170809014459.GB7693-Bkjb4tF/BptrGMd72DVhOyZ7yTyXFdtBkQQo+JxHRPFibQn6LdNjmg@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-09  2:39                       ` Brad Bolen
2017-08-09  2:39                         ` Brad Bolen
2017-08-09  2:39                         ` Brad Bolen
2017-08-09 18:38                         ` Johannes Weiner
2017-08-09 18:38                           ` Johannes Weiner
2017-08-09 18:38                           ` Johannes Weiner
2017-08-10 11:56                           ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-10 11:56                             ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-21 13:02                             ` Johannes Weiner
2017-08-21 13:02                               ` Johannes Weiner
     [not found]                               ` <20170821130218.GA1371-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-21 13:23                                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-21 13:23                                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-21 13:23                                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-10 13:50                           ` Brad Bolen
2017-08-10 13:50                             ` Brad Bolen
2017-08-11  1:30                           ` Brad Bolen
2017-08-11  1:30                             ` Brad Bolen
2017-08-11 21:37                           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-08-11 21:37                             ` Jaegeuk Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170808162122.GA14689@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=bradleybolen@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.