All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
	Steffen Maier <maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] bsg: reduce unnecessary arguments for bsg_map_hdr()
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:19:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170810221953.GC918@bblock-ThinkPad-W530> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170810093531.GP24539@lst.de>

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:35:31AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:11:19PM +0200, Benjamin Block wrote:
> > Since struct bsg_command is now used in every calling case, we don't
> > need separation of arguments anymore that are contained in the same
> > bsg_command.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  block/bsg.c | 13 ++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
> > index 8517361a9b3f..6ee2ffca808a 100644
> > --- a/block/bsg.c
> > +++ b/block/bsg.c
> > @@ -212,11 +212,12 @@ bsg_validate_sgv4_hdr(struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, int *op)
> >   * map sg_io_v4 to a request.
> >   */
> >  static struct request *
> > -bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm,
> > -	    u8 *reply_buffer)
> > +bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct bsg_command *bc,
> > +	    fmode_t has_write_perm)
> 
> I wish we could just rename the argument to mode and pass on the
> whole file->f_mode while you are cleaning up this code.  That should
> be a separate patch, though.
> 

Hmm, I did a quick pass through the code and the only place this seems
to be used, is to pass it to blk_verify_command() if the subcommand used
in the BSG request is a SCSI Command. And this has the same semantics.
So I guess this would require adjustments to the whole stack, as this is
also used from the 'normal' SG side of the world.



                                                    Beste Gr��e / Best regards,
                                                      - Benjamin Block
-- 
Linux on z Systems Development         /         IBM Systems & Technology Group
		  IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH 
Vorsitz. AufsR.: Martina Koederitz     /        Gesch�ftsf�hrung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: B�blingen / Registergericht: AmtsG Stuttgart, HRB 243294

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Block <bblock-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley"
	<jejb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
	"Martin K . Petersen"
	<martin.petersen-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
	Steffen Maier
	<maier-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
	open-iscsi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] bsg: reduce unnecessary arguments for bsg_map_hdr()
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:19:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170810221953.GC918@bblock-ThinkPad-W530> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170810093531.GP24539-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:35:31AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:11:19PM +0200, Benjamin Block wrote:
> > Since struct bsg_command is now used in every calling case, we don't
> > need separation of arguments anymore that are contained in the same
> > bsg_command.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Block <bblock-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> >  block/bsg.c | 13 ++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
> > index 8517361a9b3f..6ee2ffca808a 100644
> > --- a/block/bsg.c
> > +++ b/block/bsg.c
> > @@ -212,11 +212,12 @@ bsg_validate_sgv4_hdr(struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, int *op)
> >   * map sg_io_v4 to a request.
> >   */
> >  static struct request *
> > -bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm,
> > -	    u8 *reply_buffer)
> > +bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct bsg_command *bc,
> > +	    fmode_t has_write_perm)
> 
> I wish we could just rename the argument to mode and pass on the
> whole file->f_mode while you are cleaning up this code.  That should
> be a separate patch, though.
> 

Hmm, I did a quick pass through the code and the only place this seems
to be used, is to pass it to blk_verify_command() if the subcommand used
in the BSG request is a SCSI Command. And this has the same semantics.
So I guess this would require adjustments to the whole stack, as this is
also used from the 'normal' SG side of the world.



                                                    Beste Grüße / Best regards,
                                                      - Benjamin Block
-- 
Linux on z Systems Development         /         IBM Systems & Technology Group
		  IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH 
Vorsitz. AufsR.: Martina Koederitz     /        Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: AmtsG Stuttgart, HRB 243294

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to open-iscsi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
	Steffen Maier <maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] bsg: reduce unnecessary arguments for bsg_map_hdr()
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:19:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170810221953.GC918@bblock-ThinkPad-W530> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170810093531.GP24539@lst.de>

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:35:31AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:11:19PM +0200, Benjamin Block wrote:
> > Since struct bsg_command is now used in every calling case, we don't
> > need separation of arguments anymore that are contained in the same
> > bsg_command.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  block/bsg.c | 13 ++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
> > index 8517361a9b3f..6ee2ffca808a 100644
> > --- a/block/bsg.c
> > +++ b/block/bsg.c
> > @@ -212,11 +212,12 @@ bsg_validate_sgv4_hdr(struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, int *op)
> >   * map sg_io_v4 to a request.
> >   */
> >  static struct request *
> > -bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm,
> > -	    u8 *reply_buffer)
> > +bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct bsg_command *bc,
> > +	    fmode_t has_write_perm)
> 
> I wish we could just rename the argument to mode and pass on the
> whole file->f_mode while you are cleaning up this code.  That should
> be a separate patch, though.
> 

Hmm, I did a quick pass through the code and the only place this seems
to be used, is to pass it to blk_verify_command() if the subcommand used
in the BSG request is a SCSI Command. And this has the same semantics.
So I guess this would require adjustments to the whole stack, as this is
also used from the 'normal' SG side of the world.



                                                    Beste Grüße / Best regards,
                                                      - Benjamin Block
-- 
Linux on z Systems Development         /         IBM Systems & Technology Group
		  IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH 
Vorsitz. AufsR.: Martina Koederitz     /        Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: AmtsG Stuttgart, HRB 243294

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-10 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-09 14:11 [RFC PATCH 0/6] bsg: fix regression resulting in panics when sending commands via BSG and some sanity cleanups Benjamin Block
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] bsg: fix kernel panic resulting from missing allocation of a reply-buffer Benjamin Block
2017-08-09 14:11   ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-10  9:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-10  9:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-10 22:10     ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 22:10       ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 22:45       ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 22:45         ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 22:45         ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-11  8:38       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11  8:38         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11  9:14         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 13:49           ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-11 13:49             ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-11 14:36             ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 15:32               ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-11 15:32                 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-11 15:35                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 16:01                   ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-11 16:01                     ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-13 14:39                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-14 16:33                       ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-14 16:33                         ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-14 16:32                     ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-14 16:32                       ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-14 16:32                       ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-16 10:53                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] bsg: assign sense_len instead of fixed SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE Benjamin Block
2017-08-09 14:11   ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-10  9:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-10  9:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] bsg: scsi-transport: add compile-tests to prevent reply-buffer overflows Benjamin Block
2017-08-10  9:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-10  9:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] bsg: refactor ioctl to use regular BSG-command infrastructure for SG_IO Benjamin Block
2017-08-09 14:11   ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-10  8:24   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-08-10  8:24     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-08-10  9:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-10 22:12     ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 22:12       ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] bsg: reduce unnecessary arguments for bsg_map_hdr() Benjamin Block
2017-08-09 14:11   ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-10  8:26   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-08-10  8:26     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-08-10  8:26     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-08-10  9:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-10 22:19     ` Benjamin Block [this message]
2017-08-10 22:19       ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 22:19       ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] bsg: reduce unnecessary arguments for blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq() Benjamin Block
2017-08-09 14:11   ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-10  8:27   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-08-10  8:27     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-08-10  9:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-10  9:35     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170810221953.GC918@bblock-ThinkPad-W530 \
    --to=bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=open-iscsi@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.