From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, agraf@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10 0/1] Fix "make clean" for s390 target
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:32:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170815103221.2446bc3d.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86e21c68-93ee-0311-643d-dde2c8589eea@redhat.com>
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:26:18 +0200
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 15.08.2017 10:01, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 15.08.2017 09:03, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 07:02:10 +0200
> >> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 14.08.2017 22:44, Eric Farman wrote:
> >>>> How often does one really do a "make clean" ? Rather infrequently,
> >>>> as I only stumbled on this today.
> >>>>
> >>>> Perhaps I have missed the RM variable somewhere, as I see similar syntax
> >>>> in some of the tests/tcg/ Makefiles, but I don't see it being set here.
> >>>> My configure statement isn't terribly interesting, just enabling debug
> >>>> for an s390x target, and as such there's no RM variable in its output.
> >>>> I'll trust that Thomas will chime in with where it should have been.
> >>>> In the meantime, this does the trick for me.
> >>>
> >>> RM is one of the variables that should be pre-initialized by Make, and
> >>> AFAIK should be used to increase portability (well, it's likely not
> >>> important for QEMU since we require a posix-shell like built environment
> >>> anyway).
> >>>
> >>> According to the info page of Make, chapter "10.3 Variables Used by
> >>> Implicit Rules":
> >>>
> >>> `RM'
> >>> Command to remove a file; default `rm -f'.
> >>>
> >>> I've also checked it again and "make clean" works fine here (using GNU
> >>> Make 3.82). Which version of Make (and Linux distro) are you using?
> >>
> >> Interesting. It fails for me with GNU Make 3.82 on my RHEL guest as
> >> well.
> >>
> >>> Anyway, maybe I also simply missed something, so I'm certainly also fine
> >>> with the patch to revert it to "rm -f".
> >>
> >> Given that other bios makefiles use rm -f as well, let's just change
> >> back until we figure out what's wrong.
> >
> > I just discovered that it fails for me as well when I do "make clean"
> > from the top directory. So far I was only doing "make clean" after doing
> > a "cd pc-bios/s390-ccw" first, and that works fine. Weird. Something
> > seems to unset the RM variable in our build system, but I fail to find
> > the spot where this happens...
>
> Ok, just found it: It's this line in rules.mak:
>
> MAKEFLAGS += -rR
>
> The parameter -R disables the built-in variables, so RM can indeed not
> work here. Sorry, I wasn't aware of that setting yet, so your patch is
> indeed the right fix here (or we should maybe define RM in rules.mak, too).
The other users are all in tests/tcg/.
Would there be value in using the built-in variables generally? (Well,
value that outweighs having to go through the qemu build system...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-15 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-14 20:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10 0/1] Fix "make clean" for s390 target Eric Farman
2017-08-14 20:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Use rm command during make clean Eric Farman
2017-08-15 7:23 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-15 5:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10 0/1] Fix "make clean" for s390 target Thomas Huth
2017-08-15 7:03 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-15 8:01 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-15 8:26 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-15 8:32 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-08-15 8:39 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-15 10:27 ` Eric Farman
2017-08-15 10:00 ` Peter Maydell
2017-08-15 11:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-15 11:10 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170815103221.2446bc3d.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.