All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, dvhart@infradead.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
	Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paul>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] futex: remove duplicated code and fix UB
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:47:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824094756.GA6346@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170824073105.3901-1-jslaby@suse.cz>

Hi Jiri,

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:31:05AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> There is code duplicated over all architecture's headers for
> futex_atomic_op_inuser. Namely op decoding, access_ok check for uaddr,
> and comparison of the result.
> 
> Remove this duplication and leave up to the arches only the needed
> assembly which is now in arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser.
> 
> This effectively distributes the Will Deacon's arm64 fix for undefined
> behaviour reported by UBSAN to all architectures. The fix was done in
> commit 5f16a046f8e1 (arm64: futex: Fix undefined behaviour with
> FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT usage). Look there for an example dump.
> 
> And as suggested by Thomas, check for negative oparg too, because it was
> also reported to cause undefined behaviour report.
> 
> Note that s390 removed access_ok check in d12a29703 ("s390/uaccess:
> remove pointless access_ok() checks") as access_ok there returns true.
> We introduce it back to the helper for the sake of simplicity (it gets
> optimized away anyway).

For arm64 and the core code:

Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Although one minor thing on the core part:

> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 0939255fc750..3d38eaf05492 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -1551,6 +1551,45 @@ futex_wake(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, int nr_wake, u32 bitset)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int futex_atomic_op_inuser(unsigned int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr)
> +{
> +	unsigned int op =	  (encoded_op & 0x70000000) >> 28;
> +	unsigned int cmp =	  (encoded_op & 0x0f000000) >> 24;
> +	int oparg = sign_extend32((encoded_op & 0x00fff000) >> 12, 12);
> +	int cmparg = sign_extend32(encoded_op & 0x00000fff, 12);
> +	int oldval, ret;
> +
> +	if (encoded_op & (FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT << 28)) {
> +		if (oparg < 0 || oparg > 31)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		oparg = 1 << oparg;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, uaddr, sizeof(u32)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	ret = arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(op, oparg, &oldval, uaddr);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

We could move the pagefault_{disable,enable} calls here, and then remove
them from the futex_atomic_op_inuser callsites elsewhere in futex.c

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, dvhart@infradead.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
	Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] futex: remove duplicated code and fix UB
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:47:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824094756.GA6346@arm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20170824094756.0mu6esGyyYEkZOmizWB6dUdzNkCxwkNdChVQQpQ_nVw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170824073105.3901-1-jslaby@suse.cz>

Hi Jiri,

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:31:05AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> There is code duplicated over all architecture's headers for
> futex_atomic_op_inuser. Namely op decoding, access_ok check for uaddr,
> and comparison of the result.
> 
> Remove this duplication and leave up to the arches only the needed
> assembly which is now in arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser.
> 
> This effectively distributes the Will Deacon's arm64 fix for undefined
> behaviour reported by UBSAN to all architectures. The fix was done in
> commit 5f16a046f8e1 (arm64: futex: Fix undefined behaviour with
> FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT usage). Look there for an example dump.
> 
> And as suggested by Thomas, check for negative oparg too, because it was
> also reported to cause undefined behaviour report.
> 
> Note that s390 removed access_ok check in d12a29703 ("s390/uaccess:
> remove pointless access_ok() checks") as access_ok there returns true.
> We introduce it back to the helper for the sake of simplicity (it gets
> optimized away anyway).

For arm64 and the core code:

Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Although one minor thing on the core part:

> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 0939255fc750..3d38eaf05492 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -1551,6 +1551,45 @@ futex_wake(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, int nr_wake, u32 bitset)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int futex_atomic_op_inuser(unsigned int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr)
> +{
> +	unsigned int op =	  (encoded_op & 0x70000000) >> 28;
> +	unsigned int cmp =	  (encoded_op & 0x0f000000) >> 24;
> +	int oparg = sign_extend32((encoded_op & 0x00fff000) >> 12, 12);
> +	int cmparg = sign_extend32(encoded_op & 0x00000fff, 12);
> +	int oldval, ret;
> +
> +	if (encoded_op & (FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT << 28)) {
> +		if (oparg < 0 || oparg > 31)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		oparg = 1 << oparg;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, uaddr, sizeof(u32)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	ret = arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(op, oparg, &oldval, uaddr);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

We could move the pagefault_{disable,enable} calls here, and then remove
them from the futex_atomic_op_inuser callsites elsewhere in futex.c

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, dvhart@infradead.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
	Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paul>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] futex: remove duplicated code and fix UB
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 09:47:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824094756.GA6346@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170824073105.3901-1-jslaby@suse.cz>

Hi Jiri,

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:31:05AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> There is code duplicated over all architecture's headers for
> futex_atomic_op_inuser. Namely op decoding, access_ok check for uaddr,
> and comparison of the result.
> 
> Remove this duplication and leave up to the arches only the needed
> assembly which is now in arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser.
> 
> This effectively distributes the Will Deacon's arm64 fix for undefined
> behaviour reported by UBSAN to all architectures. The fix was done in
> commit 5f16a046f8e1 (arm64: futex: Fix undefined behaviour with
> FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT usage). Look there for an example dump.
> 
> And as suggested by Thomas, check for negative oparg too, because it was
> also reported to cause undefined behaviour report.
> 
> Note that s390 removed access_ok check in d12a29703 ("s390/uaccess:
> remove pointless access_ok() checks") as access_ok there returns true.
> We introduce it back to the helper for the sake of simplicity (it gets
> optimized away anyway).

For arm64 and the core code:

Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Although one minor thing on the core part:

> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 0939255fc750..3d38eaf05492 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -1551,6 +1551,45 @@ futex_wake(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, int nr_wake, u32 bitset)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int futex_atomic_op_inuser(unsigned int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr)
> +{
> +	unsigned int op =	  (encoded_op & 0x70000000) >> 28;
> +	unsigned int cmp =	  (encoded_op & 0x0f000000) >> 24;
> +	int oparg = sign_extend32((encoded_op & 0x00fff000) >> 12, 12);
> +	int cmparg = sign_extend32(encoded_op & 0x00000fff, 12);
> +	int oldval, ret;
> +
> +	if (encoded_op & (FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT << 28)) {
> +		if (oparg < 0 || oparg > 31)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		oparg = 1 << oparg;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, uaddr, sizeof(u32)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	ret = arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(op, oparg, &oldval, uaddr);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

We could move the pagefault_{disable,enable} calls here, and then remove
them from the futex_atomic_op_inuser callsites elsewhere in futex.c

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, dvhart@infradead.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
	Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paul
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] futex: remove duplicated code and fix UB
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:47:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824094756.GA6346@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170824073105.3901-1-jslaby@suse.cz>

Hi Jiri,

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:31:05AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> There is code duplicated over all architecture's headers for
> futex_atomic_op_inuser. Namely op decoding, access_ok check for uaddr,
> and comparison of the result.
> 
> Remove this duplication and leave up to the arches only the needed
> assembly which is now in arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser.
> 
> This effectively distributes the Will Deacon's arm64 fix for undefined
> behaviour reported by UBSAN to all architectures. The fix was done in
> commit 5f16a046f8e1 (arm64: futex: Fix undefined behaviour with
> FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT usage). Look there for an example dump.
> 
> And as suggested by Thomas, check for negative oparg too, because it was
> also reported to cause undefined behaviour report.
> 
> Note that s390 removed access_ok check in d12a29703 ("s390/uaccess:
> remove pointless access_ok() checks") as access_ok there returns true.
> We introduce it back to the helper for the sake of simplicity (it gets
> optimized away anyway).

For arm64 and the core code:

Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Although one minor thing on the core part:

> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 0939255fc750..3d38eaf05492 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -1551,6 +1551,45 @@ futex_wake(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, int nr_wake, u32 bitset)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int futex_atomic_op_inuser(unsigned int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr)
> +{
> +	unsigned int op =	  (encoded_op & 0x70000000) >> 28;
> +	unsigned int cmp =	  (encoded_op & 0x0f000000) >> 24;
> +	int oparg = sign_extend32((encoded_op & 0x00fff000) >> 12, 12);
> +	int cmparg = sign_extend32(encoded_op & 0x00000fff, 12);
> +	int oldval, ret;
> +
> +	if (encoded_op & (FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT << 28)) {
> +		if (oparg < 0 || oparg > 31)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		oparg = 1 << oparg;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, uaddr, sizeof(u32)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	ret = arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(op, oparg, &oldval, uaddr);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

We could move the pagefault_{disable,enable} calls here, and then remove
them from the futex_atomic_op_inuser callsites elsewhere in futex.c

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] futex: remove duplicated code and fix UB
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:47:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824094756.GA6346@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170824073105.3901-1-jslaby@suse.cz>

Hi Jiri,

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017@09:31:05AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> There is code duplicated over all architecture's headers for
> futex_atomic_op_inuser. Namely op decoding, access_ok check for uaddr,
> and comparison of the result.
> 
> Remove this duplication and leave up to the arches only the needed
> assembly which is now in arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser.
> 
> This effectively distributes the Will Deacon's arm64 fix for undefined
> behaviour reported by UBSAN to all architectures. The fix was done in
> commit 5f16a046f8e1 (arm64: futex: Fix undefined behaviour with
> FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT usage). Look there for an example dump.
> 
> And as suggested by Thomas, check for negative oparg too, because it was
> also reported to cause undefined behaviour report.
> 
> Note that s390 removed access_ok check in d12a29703 ("s390/uaccess:
> remove pointless access_ok() checks") as access_ok there returns true.
> We introduce it back to the helper for the sake of simplicity (it gets
> optimized away anyway).

For arm64 and the core code:

Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>

Although one minor thing on the core part:

> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 0939255fc750..3d38eaf05492 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -1551,6 +1551,45 @@ futex_wake(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, int nr_wake, u32 bitset)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int futex_atomic_op_inuser(unsigned int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr)
> +{
> +	unsigned int op =	  (encoded_op & 0x70000000) >> 28;
> +	unsigned int cmp =	  (encoded_op & 0x0f000000) >> 24;
> +	int oparg = sign_extend32((encoded_op & 0x00fff000) >> 12, 12);
> +	int cmparg = sign_extend32(encoded_op & 0x00000fff, 12);
> +	int oldval, ret;
> +
> +	if (encoded_op & (FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT << 28)) {
> +		if (oparg < 0 || oparg > 31)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		oparg = 1 << oparg;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, uaddr, sizeof(u32)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	ret = arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(op, oparg, &oldval, uaddr);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

We could move the pagefault_{disable,enable} calls here, and then remove
them from the futex_atomic_op_inuser callsites elsewhere in futex.c

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] futex: remove duplicated code and fix UB
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:47:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824094756.GA6346@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170824073105.3901-1-jslaby@suse.cz>

Hi Jiri,

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:31:05AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> There is code duplicated over all architecture's headers for
> futex_atomic_op_inuser. Namely op decoding, access_ok check for uaddr,
> and comparison of the result.
> 
> Remove this duplication and leave up to the arches only the needed
> assembly which is now in arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser.
> 
> This effectively distributes the Will Deacon's arm64 fix for undefined
> behaviour reported by UBSAN to all architectures. The fix was done in
> commit 5f16a046f8e1 (arm64: futex: Fix undefined behaviour with
> FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT usage). Look there for an example dump.
> 
> And as suggested by Thomas, check for negative oparg too, because it was
> also reported to cause undefined behaviour report.
> 
> Note that s390 removed access_ok check in d12a29703 ("s390/uaccess:
> remove pointless access_ok() checks") as access_ok there returns true.
> We introduce it back to the helper for the sake of simplicity (it gets
> optimized away anyway).

For arm64 and the core code:

Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Although one minor thing on the core part:

> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 0939255fc750..3d38eaf05492 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -1551,6 +1551,45 @@ futex_wake(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, int nr_wake, u32 bitset)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int futex_atomic_op_inuser(unsigned int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr)
> +{
> +	unsigned int op =	  (encoded_op & 0x70000000) >> 28;
> +	unsigned int cmp =	  (encoded_op & 0x0f000000) >> 24;
> +	int oparg = sign_extend32((encoded_op & 0x00fff000) >> 12, 12);
> +	int cmparg = sign_extend32(encoded_op & 0x00000fff, 12);
> +	int oldval, ret;
> +
> +	if (encoded_op & (FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT << 28)) {
> +		if (oparg < 0 || oparg > 31)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		oparg = 1 << oparg;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, uaddr, sizeof(u32)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	ret = arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(op, oparg, &oldval, uaddr);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

We could move the pagefault_{disable,enable} calls here, and then remove
them from the futex_atomic_op_inuser callsites elsewhere in futex.c

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-24  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-24  7:31 [PATCH v2 1/1] futex: remove duplicated code and fix UB Jiri Slaby
2017-08-24  7:31 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-08-24  7:31 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-08-24  7:31 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-08-24  7:31 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-08-24  7:31 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-08-24  9:47 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-08-24  9:47   ` Will Deacon
2017-08-24  9:47   ` Will Deacon
2017-08-24  9:47   ` Will Deacon
2017-08-24  9:47   ` Will Deacon
2017-08-24  9:47   ` Will Deacon
2017-08-25 20:43   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-25 20:43     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-25 20:43     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-25 20:43     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-25 20:43     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-25 20:43     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-25 20:55 ` [tip:locking/core] futex: Remove duplicated code and fix undefined behaviour tip-bot for Jiri Slaby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170824094756.GA6346@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=jonas@southpole.se \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rkuo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=shorne@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.