From: Baoquan He <bhe-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd: Check if domain is NULL before dereference it
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 20:47:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824124733.GH19768@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170824123226.57twp5sdh246l5kz@mwanda>
On 08/24/17 at 03:32pm, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Take a look at this code for example. But all the places which call
> get_domain() are the same:
>
> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
> 2648 page = virt_to_page(virt_addr);
> 2649 size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> 2650
> 2651 domain = get_domain(dev);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> imagined get_domain() returns NULL.
>
> 2652 if (IS_ERR(domain))
> 2653 goto free_mem;
> 2654
> 2655 dma_dom = to_dma_ops_domain(domain);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This will Oops.
I see, it's a problem. Thanks for telling!
How about below change? But I am not very sure which errno should be
picked, seems the latter one, EBUSY is better since it has passed the
check_device() checking.
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
index 16f1e6af00b0..2d7d04472555 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
@@ -2262,6 +2262,9 @@ static struct protection_domain *get_domain(struct device *dev)
domain = to_pdomain(io_domain);
attach_device(dev, domain);
}
+ if (domain == NULL)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
+
if (!dma_ops_domain(domain))
return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
--
2.5.5
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
joro@8bytes.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd: Check if domain is NULL before dereference it
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 20:47:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824124733.GH19768@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170824123226.57twp5sdh246l5kz@mwanda>
On 08/24/17 at 03:32pm, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Take a look at this code for example. But all the places which call
> get_domain() are the same:
>
> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
> 2648 page = virt_to_page(virt_addr);
> 2649 size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> 2650
> 2651 domain = get_domain(dev);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> imagined get_domain() returns NULL.
>
> 2652 if (IS_ERR(domain))
> 2653 goto free_mem;
> 2654
> 2655 dma_dom = to_dma_ops_domain(domain);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This will Oops.
I see, it's a problem. Thanks for telling!
How about below change? But I am not very sure which errno should be
picked, seems the latter one, EBUSY is better since it has passed the
check_device() checking.
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
index 16f1e6af00b0..2d7d04472555 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
@@ -2262,6 +2262,9 @@ static struct protection_domain *get_domain(struct device *dev)
domain = to_pdomain(io_domain);
attach_device(dev, domain);
}
+ if (domain == NULL)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
+
if (!dma_ops_domain(domain))
return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
--
2.5.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-24 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-24 11:56 [PATCH] iommu/amd: Check if domain is NULL before dereference it Baoquan He
[not found] ` <1503575807-15746-1-git-send-email-bhe-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-24 12:11 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-08-24 12:11 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-08-24 12:22 ` Baoquan He
2017-08-24 12:22 ` Baoquan He
2017-08-24 12:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-08-24 12:47 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2017-08-24 12:47 ` Baoquan He
2017-08-24 12:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-08-24 13:01 ` Baoquan He
2017-08-24 13:01 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170824124733.GH19768@x1 \
--to=bhe-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.