diff for duplicates of <20170829212606.GC8608@lst.de> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 1fbb029..d4cf789 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -4,9 +4,13 @@ First this really should be three patches, one for the DAX code, one for the VFS code and one for XFS. The DAX and XFS bits looks fine to me: -Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org> +Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> But I'm a little worried about stuffing more DAX knowledge into the block mount_bdev helper. For now it's probably ok as everything else would involve a lot of refactoring and/or duplication, but I'm generally not too happy about it. +_______________________________________________ +Linux-nvdimm mailing list +Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org +https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index e44620a..d1babfd 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,17 +1,16 @@ "ref\0150389211501.25151.6477753201827914462.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com\0" "ref\0150389212075.25151.17146973298430877023.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com\0" - "ref\0150389212075.25151.17146973298430877023.stgit-p8uTFz9XbKj2zm6wflaqv1nYeNYlB/vhral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>\0" + "From\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fs, xfs: perform dax_device lookup at mount\0" "Date\0Tue, 29 Aug 2017 23:26:06 +0200\0" - "To\0Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org" - Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> - linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org - linux-xfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - " hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org\0" + "To\0Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>\0" + "Cc\0jack@suse.cz" + Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> + linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org + linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org + linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org + linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org + " hch@lst.de\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Call me nitpicky, but..\n" @@ -20,11 +19,15 @@ "for the VFS code and one for XFS. The DAX and XFS bits looks fine to\n" "me:\n" "\n" - "Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>\n" + "Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\n" "\n" "But I'm a little worried about stuffing more DAX knowledge into the\n" "block mount_bdev helper. For now it's probably ok as everything\n" "else would involve a lot of refactoring and/or duplication, but\n" - I'm generally not too happy about it. + "I'm generally not too happy about it.\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "Linux-nvdimm mailing list\n" + "Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org\n" + https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm -430b08894af9bbc34962ff3da37820509f151143e7f3fdf6a4704aab8d0ec0ca +cdc5f31e51d9be9adc9c8b8728cdb82a45f5acf81fec44f106a3365124880d50
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 1fbb029..494ae1b 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ First this really should be three patches, one for the DAX code, one for the VFS code and one for XFS. The DAX and XFS bits looks fine to me: -Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org> +Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> But I'm a little worried about stuffing more DAX knowledge into the block mount_bdev helper. For now it's probably ok as everything diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index e44620a..26ac5e8 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -1,17 +1,16 @@ "ref\0150389211501.25151.6477753201827914462.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com\0" "ref\0150389212075.25151.17146973298430877023.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com\0" - "ref\0150389212075.25151.17146973298430877023.stgit-p8uTFz9XbKj2zm6wflaqv1nYeNYlB/vhral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>\0" + "From\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fs, xfs: perform dax_device lookup at mount\0" "Date\0Tue, 29 Aug 2017 23:26:06 +0200\0" - "To\0Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org" - Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> - linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org - linux-xfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - " hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org\0" + "To\0Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>\0" + "Cc\0linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" + jack@suse.cz + linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org + Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> + linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org + linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org + " hch@lst.de\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Call me nitpicky, but..\n" @@ -20,11 +19,11 @@ "for the VFS code and one for XFS. The DAX and XFS bits looks fine to\n" "me:\n" "\n" - "Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>\n" + "Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\n" "\n" "But I'm a little worried about stuffing more DAX knowledge into the\n" "block mount_bdev helper. For now it's probably ok as everything\n" "else would involve a lot of refactoring and/or duplication, but\n" I'm generally not too happy about it. -430b08894af9bbc34962ff3da37820509f151143e7f3fdf6a4704aab8d0ec0ca +080a6dc6f87fbb5013647dbd9678beb977667342e0ac4e9e09a9b1571fb5de49
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.