All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: oleksandr@natalenko.name
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: I/O hangs after resuming from suspend-to-ram
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:06:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170830080628.GA2402@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <692537117e26fe71b5e07cd8c86b38e4@natalenko.name>

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 08:15:02AM +0200, oleksandr@natalenko.name wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> Addressing your questions below.
> 
> > Can't reproduce even with putting dmcypt on raid10 after applying my
> > patch.
> 
> Just a side note, that dm-crypt is not necessary here — I am able to trigger
> hang with RAID10 and LVM only.
> 
> > BTW, could you share us which blk-mq scheduler you are using on sata?
> 
> Okay, now it makes sense. Previously, without your patch I was able to
> reproduce the issue with "mq-deadline", "bfq" and "none". Now, I cannot
> trigger it with "none" set, but "mq-deadline" still hangs for me. Does this
> mean each scheduler should be modified separately?

No, it shouldn't.

> 
> > Could you apply the following debug patch and provide the dmesg log
> > after running the commands below?
> 
> Is it still relevant since I confirm issue to be fixed with "none"?

Please try the following patch and previous patch together and see
if they make a difference:


>From bc5626b4b65c7ff26567e75f42584c2c43ffe7c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:53:01 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: add requests in the tail of hctx->dispatch

So that we can allow to insert request at the head
of hctx->dispatch.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq-sched.c | 2 +-
 block/blk-mq.c       | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
index eeeea026fb47..b40dd063d61f 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static bool blk_mq_sched_bypass_insert(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 	 * the dispatch list.
 	 */
 	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
-	list_add(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
+	list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
 	spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
 	return true;
 }
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 4603b115e234..fed3d0c16266 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list)
 		blk_mq_put_driver_tag(rq);
 
 		spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
-		list_splice_init(list, &hctx->dispatch);
+		list_splice_tail_init(list, &hctx->dispatch);
 		spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
 
 		/*
-- 
2.9.5


-- 
Ming

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: oleksandr@natalenko.name
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: I/O hangs after resuming from suspend-to-ram
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:06:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170830080628.GA2402@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <692537117e26fe71b5e07cd8c86b38e4@natalenko.name>

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 08:15:02AM +0200, oleksandr@natalenko.name wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> Addressing your questions below.
> 
> > Can't reproduce even with putting dmcypt on raid10 after applying my
> > patch.
> 
> Just a side note, that dm-crypt is not necessary here — I am able to trigger
> hang with RAID10 and LVM only.
> 
> > BTW, could you share us which blk-mq scheduler you are using on sata?
> 
> Okay, now it makes sense. Previously, without your patch I was able to
> reproduce the issue with "mq-deadline", "bfq" and "none". Now, I cannot
> trigger it with "none" set, but "mq-deadline" still hangs for me. Does this
> mean each scheduler should be modified separately?

No, it shouldn't.

> 
> > Could you apply the following debug patch and provide the dmesg log
> > after running the commands below?
> 
> Is it still relevant since I confirm issue to be fixed with "none"?

Please try the following patch and previous patch together and see
if they make a difference:


From bc5626b4b65c7ff26567e75f42584c2c43ffe7c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:53:01 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: add requests in the tail of hctx->dispatch

So that we can allow to insert request at the head
of hctx->dispatch.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq-sched.c | 2 +-
 block/blk-mq.c       | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
index eeeea026fb47..b40dd063d61f 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static bool blk_mq_sched_bypass_insert(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 	 * the dispatch list.
 	 */
 	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
-	list_add(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
+	list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
 	spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
 	return true;
 }
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 4603b115e234..fed3d0c16266 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list)
 		blk_mq_put_driver_tag(rq);
 
 		spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
-		list_splice_init(list, &hctx->dispatch);
+		list_splice_tail_init(list, &hctx->dispatch);
 		spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
 
 		/*
-- 
2.9.5


-- 
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-30  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-22 11:45 I/O hangs after resuming from suspend-to-ram Oleksandr Natalenko
2017-08-26 10:37 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2017-08-26 10:37   ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2017-08-26 10:48   ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2017-08-26 10:48     ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2017-08-26 11:19     ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-08-26 11:19       ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-08-26 17:17       ` Wols Lists
2017-08-26 19:33         ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-08-26 19:33           ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-08-26 13:32     ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2017-08-26 13:32       ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2017-08-27  6:02     ` Ming Lei
2017-08-27  7:43       ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2017-08-27  7:43         ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2017-08-28 12:58         ` Ming Lei
2017-08-28 12:58           ` Ming Lei
2017-08-28 13:10           ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-08-28 13:10             ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-08-28 13:32             ` Ming Lei
2017-09-20 17:25               ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-09-20 22:17                 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-24 17:33                   ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-09-24 17:33                     ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-09-25  2:59                     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-25 14:13                       ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-09-25 14:13                         ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-09-20 22:20             ` Ming Lei
2017-09-21  7:30               ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-09-21  7:30                 ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-09-21  7:33                 ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-09-21  7:33                   ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-08-28 18:22           ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2017-08-28 18:22             ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2017-08-29  0:24             ` Ming Lei
2017-08-29 15:52               ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2017-08-29 15:52                 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2017-08-30  2:15                 ` Ming Lei
2017-08-30  5:17                   ` Ming Lei
2017-08-30  6:15                     ` oleksandr
2017-08-30  8:06                       ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-08-30  8:06                         ` Ming Lei
2017-08-30 10:58                         ` oleksandr
2017-08-30 14:37                           ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170830080628.GA2402@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.