From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nvdimm tree
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 17:34:25 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170904173425.5cc0e08d@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
Hi Dan,
After merging the nvdimm tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/dax/super.c:64:20: error: redefinition of 'fs_dax_get_by_bdev'
struct dax_device *fs_dax_get_by_bdev(struct block_device *bdev)
^
In file included from drivers/dax/super.c:22:0:
include/linux/dax.h:76:34: note: previous definition of 'fs_dax_get_by_bdev' was here
static inline struct dax_device *fs_dax_get_by_bdev(struct block_device *bdev)
^
Caused by commit
78f354735081 ("dax: introduce a fs_dax_get_by_bdev() helper")
The protection in drivers/dax/super.c is CONFIG_BLOCK, while in
include/linux/dax.h it is IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_DAX) and the Makefile
uses CONFIG_DAX.
I have reverted that commit and the following 3 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
next reply other threads:[~2017-09-04 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-04 7:34 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2017-09-04 18:34 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the nvdimm tree Dan Williams
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-16 9:10 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-16 18:05 ` Dan Williams
2021-08-30 7:09 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-30 7:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-30 7:15 ` Gao Xiang
2019-07-05 7:20 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-05 8:45 ` Pankaj Gupta
2019-07-05 11:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-05 11:14 ` Pankaj Gupta
2019-07-05 22:32 ` Dan Williams
2019-07-05 23:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-20 9:29 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-20 10:30 ` Pankaj Gupta
2018-04-09 3:16 Stephen Rothwell
2018-04-09 3:38 ` Oliver
2018-04-09 7:34 ` Oliver
2018-04-09 17:11 ` Dan Williams
2018-04-09 18:14 ` Dan Williams
2017-11-03 7:19 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-03 16:04 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-24 6:11 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-24 8:39 ` Al Viro
2017-04-24 23:29 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-25 22:22 ` Dan Williams
2016-07-22 6:13 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-23 1:04 ` Dan Williams
2016-07-23 3:54 ` Dan Williams
2016-07-21 6:13 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-21 21:33 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-27 9:50 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170904173425.5cc0e08d@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.