[lustre-devel] [PATCH 0/2] LU-6808: ported to upstream staging driver

[lustre-devel] [PATCH 0/2] LU-6808: ported to upstream staging driver

[Tyson Whitehead]

Please find enclosed in the next two emails the two patches for LU-6808 ported to the in-tree staging lustre client driver in the 4.12 release.

https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6808

Fan Yong (1):
  LU-6808 ptlrpc: properly set "rq_xid" for 4MB IO

Niu Yawei (1):
  LU-6808 ptlrpc: no need to reassign mbits for replay

 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/client.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

-- 
2.14.0

[lustre-devel] [PATCH 0/2] LU-6808: ported to upstream staging driver

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 12:04:04PM -0400, Tyson Whitehead wrote:
> Please find enclosed in the next two emails the two patches for LU-6808 ported to the in-tree staging lustre client driver in the 4.12 release.

What does that mean?  What can I do with these?  4.12 is about to be
end-of-life in a few days...

confused,

greg k-h

[lustre-devel] [PATCH 0/2] LU-6808: ported to upstream staging driver

[Tyson Whitehead]

On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 7:28:52 PM EDT Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 12:04:04PM -0400, Tyson Whitehead wrote:
> > Please find enclosed in the next two emails the two patches for LU-6808 ported to the in-tree staging lustre client driver in the 4.12 release.
> 
> What does that mean?  What can I do with these?  4.12 is about to be end-of-life in a few days...
> 
> confused,

Those were some Lustre client driver patches I ported forward to the in-tree 4.12 kernel driver (as that is what our Fedora based system is running).

I was asked to pass them along on the Lustre bug tracking system for inclusion.

I see though that they should be against your staging-testing branch and not the previous release branch.  I'll move them over to this and post again.

Thanks!  -Tyson