From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] Security subsystem updates for 4.14
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 00:09:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170908070943.GA26549@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1709081448090.7880@namei.org>
The reason why I send out the original version of this patch
is because IMA used to call ->read under i_rwsem, and that deadlocked
on XFS and NFS, or ext3/4 with DAX. The call path for that is
process_measurement (takes i_rwsem)
-> ima_collect_measurement
-> ima_calc_file_hash
-> ima_calc_file_ahash / ima_calc_file_shash
-> ima_calc_file_hash_atfm / ima_calc_file_hash_tfm
-> integrity_kernel_read
ima_check_last_writer (takes i_rwsem)
-> ima_update_xattr
-> ima_collect_measurement
-> (as above)
But yes, for the init-time integrity_read_file this is incorrect.
It never tripped up, and I explicitly added the lockdep annotations
so that anything would show up, and it's been half a year since
I sent that first RFC patch..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Security subsystem updates for 4.14
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 00:09:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170908070943.GA26549@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1709081448090.7880@namei.org>
The reason why I send out the original version of this patch
is because IMA used to call ->read under i_rwsem, and that deadlocked
on XFS and NFS, or ext3/4 with DAX. The call path for that is
process_measurement (takes i_rwsem)
-> ima_collect_measurement
-> ima_calc_file_hash
-> ima_calc_file_ahash / ima_calc_file_shash
-> ima_calc_file_hash_atfm / ima_calc_file_hash_tfm
-> integrity_kernel_read
ima_check_last_writer (takes i_rwsem)
-> ima_update_xattr
-> ima_collect_measurement
-> (as above)
But yes, for the init-time integrity_read_file this is incorrect.
It never tripped up, and I explicitly added the lockdep annotations
so that anything would show up, and it's been half a year since
I sent that first RFC patch..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-08 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-04 10:29 [GIT PULL] Security subsystem updates for 4.14 James Morris
2017-09-04 10:29 ` James Morris
2017-09-07 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-07 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-08 4:48 ` James Morris
2017-09-08 4:48 ` James Morris
2017-09-08 7:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-09-08 7:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-08 17:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-08 17:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-08 17:36 ` Paul Moore
2017-09-08 17:36 ` Paul Moore
2017-09-10 4:32 ` James Morris
2017-09-10 4:32 ` James Morris
2017-09-10 4:53 ` James Morris
2017-09-10 4:53 ` James Morris
2017-09-11 22:30 ` Paul Moore
2017-09-11 22:30 ` Paul Moore
2017-09-14 21:09 ` Kees Cook
2017-09-14 21:09 ` Kees Cook
2017-09-14 21:13 ` James Morris
2017-09-14 21:13 ` James Morris
2017-09-14 21:25 ` Kees Cook
2017-09-14 21:25 ` Kees Cook
2017-09-08 19:57 ` James Morris
2017-09-08 19:57 ` James Morris
2017-09-17 7:36 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-09-17 7:36 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-09-10 8:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-10 8:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-10 14:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-09-10 14:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-09-11 6:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-11 6:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-11 21:34 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-09-11 21:34 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-09-08 22:38 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-09-08 22:38 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-09-10 2:08 ` James Morris
2017-09-10 2:08 ` James Morris
2017-09-10 7:13 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-09-10 7:13 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-09-10 12:17 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-09-10 12:17 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-09-10 6:46 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-09-10 6:46 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170908070943.GA26549@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.