All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: kan.liang@intel.com
Cc: acme@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
	namhyung@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	lukasz.odzioba@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 00/10] perf top optimization
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 10:57:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170918085708.GC17203@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1505096603-215017-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>

On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 07:23:13PM -0700, kan.liang@intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
> 
> The patch series intends to fix the severe performance issue in
> Knights Landing/Mill, when monitoring in heavy load system.
> perf top costs a few minutes to show the result, which is
> unacceptable.
> With the patch series applied, the latency will reduces to
> several seconds.
> 
> machine__synthesize_threads and perf_top__mmap_read costs most of
> the perf top time (> 99%).

looks like this patchset adds locking into code paths
used by other single threaded tools and that might
be bad for them as noted by Andi in here:

  https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=149031672928989&w=2

he proposed solution and it was changed&posted by Arnaldo in here:

  https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=149132267410294&w=2

but looks like it never got merged

could you please add this or similar code before you add the
locking code/overhead in?

thanks,
jirka

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-09-18  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-11  2:23 [PATCH RFC V2 00/10] perf top optimization kan.liang
2017-09-11  2:23 ` [PATCH RFC V2 01/10] perf tools: hashtable for machine threads kan.liang
2017-09-13 13:29   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-09-22 16:42   ` [tip:perf/core] perf machine: Use " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2017-09-11  2:23 ` [PATCH RFC V2 02/10] perf tools: using scandir to replace readdir kan.liang
2017-09-13 15:19   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-09-11  2:23 ` [PATCH RFC V2 03/10] petf tools: using comm_str to replace comm in hist_entry kan.liang
2017-09-13 15:21   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-09-18  8:38     ` Jiri Olsa
2017-09-11  2:23 ` [PATCH RFC V2 04/10] petf tools: introduce a new function to set namespaces id kan.liang
2017-09-11  2:23 ` [PATCH RFC V2 05/10] perf tools: lock to protect thread list kan.liang
2017-09-18  8:50   ` Jiri Olsa
2017-09-18 16:18     ` Liang, Kan
2017-09-11  2:23 ` [PATCH RFC V2 06/10] perf tools: lock to protect comm_str rb tree kan.liang
2017-09-11  2:23 ` [PATCH RFC V2 07/10] perf tools: change machine comm_exec type to atomic kan.liang
2017-09-13 15:24   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-09-15 20:05     ` Liang, Kan
2017-09-18 11:30       ` Jiri Olsa
2017-09-11  2:23 ` [PATCH RFC V2 08/10] perf top: implement multithreading for perf_event__synthesize_threads kan.liang
2017-09-18 11:24   ` Jiri Olsa
2017-09-11  2:23 ` [PATCH RFC V2 09/10] perf top: add option to set the number of thread for event synthesize kan.liang
2017-09-11  2:23 ` [PATCH RFC V2 10/10] perf top: switch back to overwrite mode kan.liang
2017-09-13 15:25 ` [PATCH RFC V2 00/10] perf top optimization Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-09-13 15:29   ` Liang, Kan
2017-09-13 15:38     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-09-14 21:19       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-09-15 15:11         ` Liang, Kan
2017-09-15 17:26           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-09-15 17:29             ` Liang, Kan
2017-09-15 18:24               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-09-15 18:26                 ` Liang, Kan
2017-09-18  8:57 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2017-09-18 13:01   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-09-18 16:21     ` Liang, Kan
2017-09-19  8:19     ` Jiri Olsa
2017-09-19 12:39       ` Liang, Kan
2017-09-19 14:24         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170918085708.GC17203@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.odzioba@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.