From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: reduce cmd_lock coverage in __issue_discard_cmd
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:30:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170919153016.4116-4-chao@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170919153016.4116-1-chao@kernel.org>
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
__submit_discard_cmd may lead long latency due to exhaustion of I/O
request resource in block layer, so issuing all discard under cmd_lock
may lead to hangtask, in order to avoid that, let's reduce it's coverage.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index c3eb355b0171..412ac3a68be3 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1130,14 +1130,14 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
int i, iter = 0, issued = 0;
bool io_interrupted = false;
- mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi,
- !__check_rb_tree_consistence(sbi, &dcc->root));
- blk_start_plug(&plug);
for (i = MAX_PLIST_NUM - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if (i + 1 < dpolicy->granularity)
break;
pend_list = &dcc->pend_list[i];
+
+ mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !__check_rb_tree_consistence(sbi, &dcc->root));
+ blk_start_plug(&plug);
list_for_each_entry_safe(dc, tmp, pend_list, list) {
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, dc->state != D_PREP);
@@ -1151,12 +1151,14 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
issued++;
skip:
if (++iter >= dpolicy->max_requests)
- goto out;
+ break;
}
+ blk_finish_plug(&plug);
+ mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
+
+ if (iter >= dpolicy->max_requests)
+ break;
}
-out:
- blk_finish_plug(&plug);
- mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
if (!issued && io_interrupted)
issued = -1;
--
2.14.1.145.gb3622a4ee
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: reduce cmd_lock coverage in __issue_discard_cmd
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:30:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170919153016.4116-4-chao@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170919153016.4116-1-chao@kernel.org>
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
__submit_discard_cmd may lead long latency due to exhaustion of I/O
request resource in block layer, so issuing all discard under cmd_lock
may lead to hangtask, in order to avoid that, let's reduce it's coverage.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index c3eb355b0171..412ac3a68be3 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1130,14 +1130,14 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
int i, iter = 0, issued = 0;
bool io_interrupted = false;
- mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi,
- !__check_rb_tree_consistence(sbi, &dcc->root));
- blk_start_plug(&plug);
for (i = MAX_PLIST_NUM - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if (i + 1 < dpolicy->granularity)
break;
pend_list = &dcc->pend_list[i];
+
+ mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !__check_rb_tree_consistence(sbi, &dcc->root));
+ blk_start_plug(&plug);
list_for_each_entry_safe(dc, tmp, pend_list, list) {
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, dc->state != D_PREP);
@@ -1151,12 +1151,14 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
issued++;
skip:
if (++iter >= dpolicy->max_requests)
- goto out;
+ break;
}
+ blk_finish_plug(&plug);
+ mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
+
+ if (iter >= dpolicy->max_requests)
+ break;
}
-out:
- blk_finish_plug(&plug);
- mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
if (!issued && io_interrupted)
issued = -1;
--
2.14.1.145.gb3622a4ee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-19 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-19 15:30 [PATCH 1/6] f2fs: support issuing/waiting discard in range Chao Yu
2017-09-19 15:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] f2fs: wrap discard policy Chao Yu
2017-09-27 9:57 ` Chao Yu
2017-09-27 9:57 ` Chao Yu
2017-09-19 15:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] f2fs: split " Chao Yu
2017-09-19 15:30 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2017-09-19 15:30 ` [PATCH 4/6] f2fs: reduce cmd_lock coverage in __issue_discard_cmd Chao Yu
2017-09-19 15:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] f2fs: trace f2fs_remove_discard Chao Yu
2017-09-19 15:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] f2fs: give up CP_TRIMMED_FLAG if it drops discards Chao Yu
2017-09-26 17:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] f2fs: support issuing/waiting discard in range Jaegeuk Kim
2017-09-27 1:40 ` Chao Yu
2017-09-27 1:40 ` Chao Yu
2017-10-03 20:16 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-10-03 20:52 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-10-04 0:48 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-10-04 0:43 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170919153016.4116-4-chao@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.