All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"loberman@redhat.com" <loberman@redhat.com>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] dm-mpath: return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE in case of rq allocation failure
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:56:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170919155656.GB19830@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170919144130.GA22469@redhat.com>

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:41:30AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17 2017 at  9:23am -0400,
> Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 04:06:55PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 15 2017 at  1:29pm -0400,
> > > Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Sat, 2017-09-16 at 00:44 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > > blk-mq will rerun queue via RESTART after one request is completion,
> > > > > so not necessary to wait random time for requeuing, it should trust
> > > > > blk-mq to do it.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/md/dm-mpath.c | 2 +-
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > > > > index 96aedaac2c64..f5a1088a6e79 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > > > > @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static int multipath_clone_and_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct request *rq,
> > > > >  			atomic_inc(&m->pg_init_in_progress);
> > > > >  			activate_or_offline_path(pgpath);
> > > > >  		}
> > > > > -		return DM_MAPIO_DELAY_REQUEUE;
> > > > > +		return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE;
> > > > >  	}
> > > > >  	clone->bio = clone->biotail = NULL;
> > > > >  	clone->rq_disk = bdev->bd_disk;
> > > > 
> > > > So you are reverting the patch below? Thank you very much.
> > > > 
> > > > commit 1c23484c355ec360ca2f37914f8a4802c6baeead
> > > > Author: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
> > > > Date:   Wed Aug 9 11:32:12 2017 -0700
> > > > 
> > > >     dm mpath: do not lock up a CPU with requeuing activity
> > > >     
> > > >     When using the block layer in single queue mode, get_request()
> > > >     returns ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN) if the queue is dying and the REQ_NOWAIT
> > > >     flag has been passed to get_request(). Avoid that the kernel
> > > >     reports soft lockup complaints in this case due to continuous
> > > >     requeuing activity.
> > > >     
> > > >     Fixes: 7083abbbf ("dm mpath: avoid that path removal can trigger an infinite loop")
> > > >     Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > >     Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
> > > >     Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
> > > >     Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > >     Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > The problem is that multipath_clone_and_map() is now treated as common
> > > code (thanks to both blk-mq and old .request_fn now enjoying the use of
> > > blk_get_request) BUT: Ming please understand that this code is used by
> > > old .request_fn too.  So it would seem that the use of
> > 
> > Hi Mike,
> > 
> > OK, thanks for pointing this out.
> > 
> > > DM_MAPIO_DELAY_REQUEUE vs DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE needs to be based on dm-sq vs
> > > dm-mq.
> > 
> > Yeah, just forget that dm-mq can't work on underlying queue which is
> > block legacy path, also forget the exact reason, :-(
> 
> Not sure how that detail is relevant to your patch?
> 
> But here are the 2 patches I posted as RFC to eliminate the restriction:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9839565/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9839567/

Thanks for the posting.

> 
> In the end I'm not too interested in supporting blk-mq multipath ontop
> of block legacy path.  But I'd revisit if hch or someone else posted the
> blk-mq patch that "removed the ->complete handler" (as hch mentions in
> the thread of the first patchwork patch I reference above).

If blk-mq mpath can be ontop of both block legacy and blk-mq,
the legacy .request_fn can be removed from dm mpath, that can
be a big simplification, especially the global parameter of
use_blk_mq may exist for a bit long.

-- 
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-19 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-15 16:44 [PATCH 0/5] dm-mpath: improve I/O schedule Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44   ` Ming Lei
2017-09-15 17:57   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 17:57     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 17:57     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-17 12:40     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-17 12:40       ` Ming Lei
2017-09-18 15:18       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-18 15:18         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-18 15:18         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19  5:43         ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19  5:43           ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 15:36           ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 15:36             ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 15:36             ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 15:56             ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 15:56               ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 16:04               ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 16:04                 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 16:49                 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:49                   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:49                   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:55                   ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 16:55                     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 18:42                     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 18:42                       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 18:42                       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 22:44                       ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 22:44                         ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 23:25                         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 23:25                           ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 23:25                           ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 23:50                           ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 23:50                             ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-20  1:13                             ` Ming Lei
2017-09-20  1:13                               ` Ming Lei
2017-09-20  1:19                   ` Ming Lei
2017-09-20  1:19                     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 15:48           ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 15:48             ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 15:52             ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 15:52               ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 15:52               ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:03               ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 16:03                 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 16:07             ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 16:07               ` Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] dm-mpath: return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE in case of rq allocation failure Ming Lei
2017-09-15 17:29   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 17:29     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 20:06     ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-15 20:48       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 20:48         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-17 13:23       ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 14:41         ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 15:56           ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-09-17 12:51     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] dm-mpath: remove annoying message of 'blk_get_request() returned -11' Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] block: export blk_update_nr_requests Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] dm-mpath: improve I/O schedule Ming Lei
2017-09-15 20:10   ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-15 20:56   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 20:56     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 21:06   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 21:06     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 21:42   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 21:42     ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170919155656.GB19830@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.