All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"sagi@grimberg.me" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"loberman@redhat.com" <loberman@redhat.com>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] block: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:19:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170920011925.GB23062@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1505839754.2671.42.camel@wdc.com>

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:49:15PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 00:04 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Run queue at end_io is definitely wrong, because blk-mq has SCHED_RESTART
> > to do that already.
> 
> Sorry but I disagree. If SCHED_RESTART is set that causes the blk-mq core to
> reexamine the software queues and the hctx dispatch list but not the requeue
> list. If a block driver returns BLK_STS_RESOURCE then requests end up on the
> requeue list. Hence the following code in scsi_end_request():
> 
> 	if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun || !list_empty(&sdev->host->starved_list))
> 		kblockd_schedule_work(&sdev->requeue_work);
> 	else
> 		blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true);

Let's focus on dm-rq.

I have explained before, dm-rq is different with SCSI's, we don't need
to requeue request any more in dm-rq if blk_get_request() returns NULL
in multipath_clone_and_map(), since SCHED_RESTART can cover that
definitely.

Not mention dm_mq_delay_requeue_request() will run the queue explicitly
if it has to be done. That needn't SCHED_RESTART to cover, right?

-- 
Ming

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ming.lei@redhat.com (Ming Lei)
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] block: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:19:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170920011925.GB23062@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1505839754.2671.42.camel@wdc.com>

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017@04:49:15PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-20@00:04 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Run queue at end_io is definitely wrong, because blk-mq has SCHED_RESTART
> > to do that already.
> 
> Sorry but I disagree. If SCHED_RESTART is set that causes the blk-mq core to
> reexamine the software queues and the hctx dispatch list but not the requeue
> list. If a block driver returns BLK_STS_RESOURCE then requests end up on the
> requeue list. Hence the following code in scsi_end_request():
> 
> 	if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun || !list_empty(&sdev->host->starved_list))
> 		kblockd_schedule_work(&sdev->requeue_work);
> 	else
> 		blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true);

Let's focus on dm-rq.

I have explained before, dm-rq is different with SCSI's, we don't need
to requeue request any more in dm-rq if blk_get_request() returns NULL
in multipath_clone_and_map(), since SCHED_RESTART can cover that
definitely.

Not mention dm_mq_delay_requeue_request() will run the queue explicitly
if it has to be done. That needn't SCHED_RESTART to cover, right?

-- 
Ming

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-09-20  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-15 16:44 [PATCH 0/5] dm-mpath: improve I/O schedule Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44   ` Ming Lei
2017-09-15 17:57   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 17:57     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 17:57     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-17 12:40     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-17 12:40       ` Ming Lei
2017-09-18 15:18       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-18 15:18         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-18 15:18         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19  5:43         ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19  5:43           ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 15:36           ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 15:36             ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 15:36             ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 15:56             ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 15:56               ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 16:04               ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 16:04                 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 16:49                 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:49                   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:49                   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:55                   ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 16:55                     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 18:42                     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 18:42                       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 18:42                       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 22:44                       ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 22:44                         ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 23:25                         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 23:25                           ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 23:25                           ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 23:50                           ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 23:50                             ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-20  1:13                             ` Ming Lei
2017-09-20  1:13                               ` Ming Lei
2017-09-20  1:19                   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-09-20  1:19                     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 15:48           ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 15:48             ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 15:52             ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 15:52               ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 15:52               ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:03               ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 16:03                 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 16:07             ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 16:07               ` Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] dm-mpath: return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE in case of rq allocation failure Ming Lei
2017-09-15 17:29   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 17:29     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 20:06     ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-15 20:48       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 20:48         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-17 13:23       ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 14:41         ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 15:56           ` Ming Lei
2017-09-17 12:51     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] dm-mpath: remove annoying message of 'blk_get_request() returned -11' Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] block: export blk_update_nr_requests Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] dm-mpath: improve I/O schedule Ming Lei
2017-09-15 20:10   ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-15 20:56   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 20:56     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 21:06   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 21:06     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 21:42   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 21:42     ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170920011925.GB23062@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.