All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: perag initialization should only touch m_ag_max_usable for AG 0
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:12:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170921171258.GI7112@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170921140421.GA24142@infradead.org>

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 07:04:21AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > We call __xfs_ag_resv_init to make a per-AG reservation for each AG.
> > This makes the reservation per-AG, not per-filesystem.  Therefore, it
> > is incorrect to adjust m_ag_max_usable for each AG.  Adjust it only
> > when we're reserving AG 0's blocks so that we only do it once per fs.
> 
> This looks correct to me, but I hate how we manipulate a per-mount
> value.  Is there a way we can just move this to the caller?

I'm not sure which caller you're referring to -- if you mean
xfs_ag_resv_init, then we'd still have the "if (pag->agno == 0)
xfs_mod_fdblocks(...)"; and if xfs_fs_reserve_ag_blocks then you'd have
to bubble the two ask values up out of xfs_ag_resv_init, which also
seems like a layering violation.  Modifying fdblocks in
__xfs_ag_resv_init (Dave I think is sharpening his axe on that) smells
kinda funny but it's less code intensive.

<confused>

--D

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      reply	other threads:[~2017-09-21 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-19 18:10 [PATCH] xfs: perag initialization should only touch m_ag_max_usable for AG 0 Darrick J. Wong
2017-09-20 13:23 ` Brian Foster
2017-09-21 14:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-21 17:12   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170921171258.GI7112@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.