From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] xfs: validate bdev support for DAX inode flag
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:16:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170926171638.GA20159@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170926063650.GE6870@lst.de>
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 08:36:50AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 05:13:59PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > Currently only the blocksize is checked, but we should really be calling
> > bdev_dax_supported() which also tests to make sure we can get a
> > struct dax_device and that the dax_direct_access() path is working.
> >
> > This is the same check that we do for the "-o dax" mount option in
> > xfs_fs_fill_super().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> I think we just want to pick this up ASAP. And between my vague
> memoried and that reviewed-by tag it already was part of a different
> series, wasn't it?
Yep, the first 2 patches were part of this series:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/7/552
which you reviewed. I included them in this series because the later patches
needed to build on them. It looks like they are now in Darrick's
xfs-4.14-fixes branch, but haven't yet made it upstream.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] xfs: validate bdev support for DAX inode flag
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:16:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170926171638.GA20159@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170926063650.GE6870@lst.de>
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 08:36:50AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 05:13:59PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > Currently only the blocksize is checked, but we should really be calling
> > bdev_dax_supported() which also tests to make sure we can get a
> > struct dax_device and that the dax_direct_access() path is working.
> >
> > This is the same check that we do for the "-o dax" mount option in
> > xfs_fs_fill_super().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> I think we just want to pick this up ASAP. And between my vague
> memoried and that reviewed-by tag it already was part of a different
> series, wasn't it?
Yep, the first 2 patches were part of this series:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/7/552
which you reviewed. I included them in this series because the later patches
needed to build on them. It looks like they are now in Darrick's
xfs-4.14-fixes branch, but haven't yet made it upstream.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] xfs: validate bdev support for DAX inode flag
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:16:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170926171638.GA20159@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170926063650.GE6870@lst.de>
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 08:36:50AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 05:13:59PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > Currently only the blocksize is checked, but we should really be calling
> > bdev_dax_supported() which also tests to make sure we can get a
> > struct dax_device and that the dax_direct_access() path is working.
> >
> > This is the same check that we do for the "-o dax" mount option in
> > xfs_fs_fill_super().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> I think we just want to pick this up ASAP. And between my vague
> memoried and that reviewed-by tag it already was part of a different
> series, wasn't it?
Yep, the first 2 patches were part of this series:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/7/552
which you reviewed. I included them in this series because the later patches
needed to build on them. It looks like they are now in Darrick's
xfs-4.14-fixes branch, but haven't yet made it upstream.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-26 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 130+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-25 23:13 [PATCH 0/7] re-enable XFS per-inode DAX Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:13 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:13 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:13 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: always use DAX if mount option is used Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:13 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:13 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:38 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-25 23:38 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-25 23:38 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-26 9:35 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-26 9:35 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-26 9:35 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-26 11:09 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-26 11:09 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-26 11:09 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-26 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 17:30 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 17:30 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 17:30 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 19:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-09-26 19:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-09-26 22:00 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-26 22:00 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-26 22:00 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-27 6:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-27 6:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-27 6:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-27 16:15 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-27 16:15 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-10-01 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-01 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-01 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 18:02 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-09-26 18:02 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-09-26 18:02 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-09-26 18:50 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 18:50 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 18:50 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:13 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: validate bdev support for DAX inode flag Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:13 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:13 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 17:16 ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2017-09-26 17:16 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 17:16 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 17:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-09-26 17:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-09-25 23:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: protect S_DAX transitions in XFS read path Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:14 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:14 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:27 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-25 23:27 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-25 23:27 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-26 6:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 6:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 6:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 13:59 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-26 13:59 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-26 13:59 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-26 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 18:11 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-26 18:11 ` Dan Williams
2017-10-01 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-01 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-01 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-25 23:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: protect S_DAX transitions in XFS write path Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:14 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:14 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:29 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-25 23:29 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-25 23:29 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-25 23:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: introduce xfs_is_dax_state_changing Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:14 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:14 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 6:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 6:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 6:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-25 23:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm, fs: introduce file_operations->post_mmap() Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:14 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:14 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:38 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-25 23:38 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-26 18:57 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 18:57 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 18:57 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 19:19 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-26 19:19 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-26 19:19 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-26 21:06 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 21:06 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 21:06 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 21:41 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-26 21:41 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-26 21:41 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-27 11:35 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-27 11:35 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-27 11:35 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-27 14:00 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-27 14:00 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-27 14:00 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-27 15:07 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-27 15:07 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-27 15:07 ` Jan Kara
2017-09-27 15:36 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-27 15:36 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-27 15:39 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-27 15:39 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-27 15:39 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-27 15:54 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-27 15:54 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-27 15:54 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-26 6:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 6:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 6:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-25 23:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: re-enable XFS per-inode DAX Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:14 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-25 23:14 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 0:31 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-26 0:31 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-26 0:31 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-26 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-26 19:01 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 19:01 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-26 19:01 ` Ross Zwisler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170926171638.GA20159@linux.intel.com \
--to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.