From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller@googlegroups.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Subject: Re: EBPF-triggered WARNING at mm/percpu.c:1361 in v4-14-rc2
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:53:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170928145302.GE15129@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170928144538.GA32487@leverpostej>
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 03:45:38PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Perhaps the pr_warn() should be ratelimited; or could there be an
> > option where we only return NULL, not triggering a warn at all (which
> > would likely be what callers might do anyway when checking against
> > PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE and then bailing out)?
>
> Those both make sense to me; checking __GFP_NOWARN should be easy
> enough.
That also makes sense.
> Just to check, do you think that dev_map_alloc() should explicitly test
> the size against PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE, prior to calling pcpu_alloc()?
But let's please not do this.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller@googlegroups.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Subject: Re: EBPF-triggered WARNING at mm/percpu.c:1361 in v4-14-rc2
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:53:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170928145302.GE15129@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170928144538.GA32487@leverpostej>
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 03:45:38PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Perhaps the pr_warn() should be ratelimited; or could there be an
> > option where we only return NULL, not triggering a warn at all (which
> > would likely be what callers might do anyway when checking against
> > PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE and then bailing out)?
>
> Those both make sense to me; checking __GFP_NOWARN should be easy
> enough.
That also makes sense.
> Just to check, do you think that dev_map_alloc() should explicitly test
> the size against PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE, prior to calling pcpu_alloc()?
But let's please not do this.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-28 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-28 11:27 EBPF-triggered WARNING at mm/percpu.c:1361 in v4-14-rc2 Mark Rutland
2017-09-28 11:27 ` Mark Rutland
2017-09-28 14:37 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-09-28 14:37 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-09-28 14:45 ` Mark Rutland
2017-09-28 14:45 ` Mark Rutland
2017-09-28 14:53 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-09-28 14:53 ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-28 15:00 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-09-28 15:00 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-09-28 14:52 ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-28 14:52 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170928145302.GE15129@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.