From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, jhugo@codeaurora.org,
wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com, Jonathan.Zhang@cavium.com,
ahs3@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Fixup users of topology_physical_package_id
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 14:56:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171002215621.GS457@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170919184751.25110-6-jeremy.linton@arm.com>
On 09/19, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> There are a few arm64 specific users (cpufreq, psci, etc) which really
> want the cluster rather than the topology_physical_package_id(). Lets
> convert those users to topology_cod_id(). That way when we start
> differentiating the socket/cluster they will continue to behave correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> ---
For:
> drivers/clk/clk-mb86s7x.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Fixup users of topology_physical_package_id
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 14:56:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171002215621.GS457@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170919184751.25110-6-jeremy.linton@arm.com>
On 09/19, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> There are a few arm64 specific users (cpufreq, psci, etc) which really
> want the cluster rather than the topology_physical_package_id(). Lets
> convert those users to topology_cod_id(). That way when we start
> differentiating the socket/cluster they will continue to behave correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> ---
For:
> drivers/clk/clk-mb86s7x.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-02 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-19 18:47 [PATCH v2 0/6] Support PPTT for ARM64 Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ACPI/PPTT: Add Processor Properties Topology Table parsing Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-09-20 7:15 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-09-20 7:15 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-09-20 7:15 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-09-20 7:15 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-09-21 18:48 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-09-21 18:48 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-09-22 1:15 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-09-22 1:15 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-09-22 1:15 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-09-19 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI: Enable PPTT support on ARM64 Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] drivers: base: cacheinfo: arm64: Add support for ACPI based firmware tables Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-09-20 15:45 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-09-20 15:45 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] Topology: Add cluster on die macros and arm64 decoding Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Fixup users of topology_physical_package_id Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-10-02 21:56 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2017-10-02 21:56 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-09-19 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: topology: Enable ACPI/PPTT based CPU topology Jeremy Linton
2017-09-19 18:47 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-09-20 6:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Support PPTT for ARM64 Xiongfeng Wang
2017-09-20 6:56 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-09-20 6:56 ` Xiongfeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171002215621.GS457@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Zhang@cavium.com \
--cc=ahs3@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.