All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] bsg: split handling of SCSI CDBs vs transport requeues
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 09:20:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171004072059.GA21411@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mqd7ewbidos.fsf@linux-x5ow.site>

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 09:18:11AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Wouldn't it make sense to put the ->release() method into bsg_ops as
> well? The current prototype of bsg_register_queue isn't exactly what I
> would call a sane API.

It's a different level of callback - ops are the type of request
passed through (scsi vs transport) and ->release is s whacky
implementation detail of the SAS passthrough.  If at all ->release
should go away eventually by cleaning that mess up.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-04  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-03 10:48 [RFC] bsg-lib interface cleanup Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-03 10:48 ` [PATCH 1/9] bsg-lib: fix use-after-free under memory-pressure Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04  6:16   ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04  8:54   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-04  8:54     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-03 10:48 ` [PATCH 2/9] bfa: don't reset max_segments for every bsg request Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04  6:16   ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04  8:54   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-04  8:54     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-03 10:48 ` [PATCH 3/9] libfc: don't assign resid_len in fc_lport_bsg_request Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04  6:17   ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04  8:54   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-04  8:54     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-03 10:48 ` [PATCH 4/9] qla2xxx: don't break the bsg-lib abstractions Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04  6:20   ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04  8:54   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-04  8:54     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-05 16:58   ` Madhani, Himanshu
2017-10-05 16:58     ` Madhani, Himanshu
2017-10-03 10:48 ` [PATCH 5/9] scsi_transport_sas: check reply payload length instead of bidi request Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04  6:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04  8:53   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-04  8:53     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-03 10:48 ` [PATCH 6/9] bsg-lib: introduce a timeout field in struct bsg_job Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04  6:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04  8:53   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-04  8:53     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-16 16:30   ` Benjamin Block
2017-10-16 16:30     ` Benjamin Block
2017-10-03 10:48 ` [PATCH 7/9] bsg-lib: remove bsg_job.req Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04  6:22   ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04  8:52   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-04  8:52     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-16 16:36   ` Benjamin Block
2017-10-16 16:36     ` Benjamin Block
2017-10-03 10:48 ` [PATCH 8/9] block: pass full fmode_t to blk_verify_command Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04  6:23   ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04  8:52   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-04  8:52     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-16 16:50   ` Benjamin Block
2017-10-16 16:50     ` Benjamin Block
2017-10-03 10:48 ` [PATCH 9/9] bsg: split handling of SCSI CDBs vs transport requeues Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04  6:26   ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04  7:18   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-04  7:20     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-10-04  8:52       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-04  8:52         ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-04  7:18   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-19 15:59   ` Benjamin Block
2017-10-19 15:59     ` Benjamin Block
2017-10-20 16:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-20 16:47       ` Benjamin Block
2017-10-20 16:47         ` Benjamin Block
2017-10-23  6:16         ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-10-23  6:29           ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-23  7:17             ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-10-24 17:46               ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-24 16:58   ` Benjamin Block
2017-10-24 16:58     ` Benjamin Block
2017-10-04 14:35 ` [RFC] bsg-lib interface cleanup Jens Axboe
2017-10-17  3:50 ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171004072059.GA21411@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.