From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Juergen Borleis <jbe@pengutronix.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iptables: change large file support handling
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 17:09:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171004150956.GA22903@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201710041652.05852.jbe@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Juergen Borleis wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
>
> On Wednesday 04 October 2017 16:46:06 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > > > The configure script handles the "--*-largefile" parameter badly.
> > > > > It defaults to large file support if not given and always disables
> > > > > largefile support if given (and it doesn't matter if 'enable' or
> > > > > 'disable' was used)
> > > >
> > > > It seems the default behaviour for a while has been to enable
> > > > largefile by default.
> > > >
> > > > Then, someone came in to add this --disable-largefile configure time
> > > > option, see:
> > > >
> > > > commit 967cb7106f0f61cd7b8fbb10bc2451a3f7372a43
> > > > Author: Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org>
> > > > Date: Mon May 10 17:50:41 2010 +0200
> > > >
> > > > iptables: optionally disable largefile support
> > > >
> > > > So I would just fix --enable-* --disable-*.
> > > >
> > > > Would you follow up on this? Let me know, thanks.
> > >
> > > With my change the default is still "enabled" and you can disable it on
> > > demand.
> >
> > I'm going to remove this from your log message: "It defaults to large
> > file support if not given", when I read this I thought this was the
> > problem.
>
> Ahh, okay.
Now applied, thanks for explaining.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-28 8:59 [PATCH] iptables: change large file support handling Juergen Borleis
2017-10-04 14:14 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-10-04 14:39 ` Juergen Borleis
2017-10-04 14:46 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-10-04 14:52 ` Juergen Borleis
2017-10-04 15:09 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171004150956.GA22903@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=jbe@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.