From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Wolfram Sang" <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"Steven Miao" <realmz6@gmail.com>,
"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
"Ben Dooks" <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
"Heiko Schocher" <hs@denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] i2c: gpio: Convert to use descriptors
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 16:24:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171009142403.GA17971@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170917093906.16325-2-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 11:39:00AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This converts the GPIO-based I2C-driver to using GPIO
> descriptors instead of the old global numberspace-based
> GPIO interface. We:
>
> - Convert the driver to unconditionally grab two GPIOs
> from the device by index 0 (SDA) and 1 (SCL) which
> will work fine with device tree and descriptor tables.
> The existing device trees will continue to work just
> like before, but without any roundtrip through the
> global numberspace.
>
> - Brutally convert all boardfiles still passing global
> GPIOs by registering descriptor tables associated with
> the devices instead so this driver does not need to keep
> supporting passing any GPIO numbers as platform data.
>
> There is no stepwise approach as elegant as this, I
> strongly prefer this big hammer over any antsteps for this
> conversion. This way the old GPIO numbers go away and
> NEVER COME BACK.
>
> Special conversion for the different boards utilizing
> I2C-GPIO:
>
> - EP93xx (arch/arm/mach-ep93xx): pretty straight forward as
> all boards were using the same two GPIO lines, just define
> these two in a lookup table for "i2c-gpio" and register
> these along with the device. None of them define any
> other platform data so just pass NULL as platform data.
> This platform selects GPIOLIB so all should be smooth.
> The pins appear on a gpiochip for bank "G" as pins 1 (SDA)
> and 0 (SCL).
>
> - IXP4 (arch/arm/mach-ixp4): descriptor tables have to
> be registered for each board separately. They all use
> "IXP4XX_GPIO_CHIP" so it is pretty straight forward.
> Most board define no other platform data than SCL/SDA
> so they can drop the #include of <linux/i2c-gpio.h> and
> assign NULL to platform data.
>
> The "goramo_mlr" (Goramo Multilink Router) board is a bit
> worrisome: it implements its own I2C bit-banging in the
> board file, and optionally registers an I2C serial port,
> but claims the same GPIO lines for itself in the board file.
> This is not going to work: there will be competition for the
> GPIO lines, so delete the optional extra I2C bus instead, no
> I2C devices are registered on it anyway, there are just hints
> that it may contain an EEPROM that may be accessed from
> userspace. This needs to be fixed up properly by the serial
> clock using I2C emulation so drop a note in the code.
>
> - KS8695 board acs5k (arch/arm/mach-ks8695/board-acs5.c)
> has some platform data in addition to the pins so it needs to
> be kept around sans GPIO lines. Its GPIO chip is named
> "KS8695" and the arch selects GPIOLIB.
>
> - PXA boards (arch/arm/mach-pxa/*) use some of the platform
> data so it needs to be preserved here. The viper board even
> registers two GPIO I2Cs. The gpiochip is named "gpio-pxa" and
> the arch selects GPIOLIB.
>
> - SA1100 Simpad (arch/arm/mach-sa1100/simpad.c) defines a GPIO
> I2C bus, and the arch selects GPIOLIB.
>
> - Blackfin boards (arch/blackfin/bf533 etc) for these I assume
> their I2C GPIOs refer to the local gpiochip defined in
> arch/blackfin/kernel/bfin_gpio.c names "BFIN-GPIO".
> The arch selects GPIOLIB. The boards get spiked with
> IF_ENABLED(I2C_GPIO) but that is a side effect of it
> being like that already (I would just have Kconfig select
> I2C_GPIO and get rid of them all.) I also delete any
> platform data set to 0 as it will get that value anyway
> from static declartions of platform data.
>
> - The MIPS selects GPIOLIB and the Alchemy machine is using
> two local GPIO chips, one of them has a GPIO I2C. We need
> to adjust the local offset from the global number space here.
> The ATH79 has a proper GPIO driver in drivers/gpio/gpio-ath79.c
> and AFAICT the chip is named "ath79-gpio" and the PB44
> PCF857x expander spawns from this on GPIO 1 and 0. The latter
> board only use the platform data to specify pins so it can be
> cut altogether after this.
>
> - The MFD Silicon Motion SM501 is a special case. It dynamically
> spawns an I2C bus off the MFD using sm501_create_subdev().
> We use an approach to dynamically create a machine descriptor
> table and attach this to the "SM501-LOW" or "SM501-HIGH"
> gpiochip. We use chip-local offsets to grab the right lines.
> We can get rid of two local static inline helpers as part
> of this refactoring.
>
> Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
> Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
> Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
> - Fix a minor typo in error path (scl was sda from copy-paste)
> - Collected Olof's ACK
>
> Steven (Blackfin): requesting ACK for Wolfram to take this patch.
> Ralf (MIPS): requesting ACK for Wolfram to take this patch.
> Lee: requesting ACK for Wolfram to take this patch.
> SM501 users: requesting Tested-by on this patch.
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c | 39 ++++----
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/edb93xx.c | 15 +--
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/platform.h | 4 +-
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/simone.c | 12 +--
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/snappercl15.c | 12 +--
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/vision_ep9307.c | 7 +-
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/avila-setup.c | 17 +++-
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/dsmg600-setup.c | 16 +++-
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/fsg-setup.c | 16 +++-
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/goramo_mlr.c | 24 ++---
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/ixdp425-setup.c | 16 +++-
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/nas100d-setup.c | 16 +++-
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/nslu2-setup.c | 16 +++-
> arch/arm/mach-ks8695/board-acs5k.c | 13 ++-
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/palmz72.c | 12 ++-
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c | 27 +++++-
> arch/arm/mach-sa1100/simpad.c | 12 ++-
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf533/boards/blackstamp.c | 19 +++-
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf533/boards/ezkit.c | 18 +++-
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf533/boards/stamp.c | 18 +++-
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/boards/ezkit.c | 18 +++-
> arch/mips/alchemy/board-gpr.c | 19 +++-
> arch/mips/ath79/mach-pb44.c | 16 +++-
For MIPS:
Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Ralf
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ralf@linux-mips.org (Ralf Baechle)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] i2c: gpio: Convert to use descriptors
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 16:24:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171009142403.GA17971@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170917093906.16325-2-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 11:39:00AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This converts the GPIO-based I2C-driver to using GPIO
> descriptors instead of the old global numberspace-based
> GPIO interface. We:
>
> - Convert the driver to unconditionally grab two GPIOs
> from the device by index 0 (SDA) and 1 (SCL) which
> will work fine with device tree and descriptor tables.
> The existing device trees will continue to work just
> like before, but without any roundtrip through the
> global numberspace.
>
> - Brutally convert all boardfiles still passing global
> GPIOs by registering descriptor tables associated with
> the devices instead so this driver does not need to keep
> supporting passing any GPIO numbers as platform data.
>
> There is no stepwise approach as elegant as this, I
> strongly prefer this big hammer over any antsteps for this
> conversion. This way the old GPIO numbers go away and
> NEVER COME BACK.
>
> Special conversion for the different boards utilizing
> I2C-GPIO:
>
> - EP93xx (arch/arm/mach-ep93xx): pretty straight forward as
> all boards were using the same two GPIO lines, just define
> these two in a lookup table for "i2c-gpio" and register
> these along with the device. None of them define any
> other platform data so just pass NULL as platform data.
> This platform selects GPIOLIB so all should be smooth.
> The pins appear on a gpiochip for bank "G" as pins 1 (SDA)
> and 0 (SCL).
>
> - IXP4 (arch/arm/mach-ixp4): descriptor tables have to
> be registered for each board separately. They all use
> "IXP4XX_GPIO_CHIP" so it is pretty straight forward.
> Most board define no other platform data than SCL/SDA
> so they can drop the #include of <linux/i2c-gpio.h> and
> assign NULL to platform data.
>
> The "goramo_mlr" (Goramo Multilink Router) board is a bit
> worrisome: it implements its own I2C bit-banging in the
> board file, and optionally registers an I2C serial port,
> but claims the same GPIO lines for itself in the board file.
> This is not going to work: there will be competition for the
> GPIO lines, so delete the optional extra I2C bus instead, no
> I2C devices are registered on it anyway, there are just hints
> that it may contain an EEPROM that may be accessed from
> userspace. This needs to be fixed up properly by the serial
> clock using I2C emulation so drop a note in the code.
>
> - KS8695 board acs5k (arch/arm/mach-ks8695/board-acs5.c)
> has some platform data in addition to the pins so it needs to
> be kept around sans GPIO lines. Its GPIO chip is named
> "KS8695" and the arch selects GPIOLIB.
>
> - PXA boards (arch/arm/mach-pxa/*) use some of the platform
> data so it needs to be preserved here. The viper board even
> registers two GPIO I2Cs. The gpiochip is named "gpio-pxa" and
> the arch selects GPIOLIB.
>
> - SA1100 Simpad (arch/arm/mach-sa1100/simpad.c) defines a GPIO
> I2C bus, and the arch selects GPIOLIB.
>
> - Blackfin boards (arch/blackfin/bf533 etc) for these I assume
> their I2C GPIOs refer to the local gpiochip defined in
> arch/blackfin/kernel/bfin_gpio.c names "BFIN-GPIO".
> The arch selects GPIOLIB. The boards get spiked with
> IF_ENABLED(I2C_GPIO) but that is a side effect of it
> being like that already (I would just have Kconfig select
> I2C_GPIO and get rid of them all.) I also delete any
> platform data set to 0 as it will get that value anyway
> from static declartions of platform data.
>
> - The MIPS selects GPIOLIB and the Alchemy machine is using
> two local GPIO chips, one of them has a GPIO I2C. We need
> to adjust the local offset from the global number space here.
> The ATH79 has a proper GPIO driver in drivers/gpio/gpio-ath79.c
> and AFAICT the chip is named "ath79-gpio" and the PB44
> PCF857x expander spawns from this on GPIO 1 and 0. The latter
> board only use the platform data to specify pins so it can be
> cut altogether after this.
>
> - The MFD Silicon Motion SM501 is a special case. It dynamically
> spawns an I2C bus off the MFD using sm501_create_subdev().
> We use an approach to dynamically create a machine descriptor
> table and attach this to the "SM501-LOW" or "SM501-HIGH"
> gpiochip. We use chip-local offsets to grab the right lines.
> We can get rid of two local static inline helpers as part
> of this refactoring.
>
> Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Cc: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
> Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
> Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
> - Fix a minor typo in error path (scl was sda from copy-paste)
> - Collected Olof's ACK
>
> Steven (Blackfin): requesting ACK for Wolfram to take this patch.
> Ralf (MIPS): requesting ACK for Wolfram to take this patch.
> Lee: requesting ACK for Wolfram to take this patch.
> SM501 users: requesting Tested-by on this patch.
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c | 39 ++++----
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/edb93xx.c | 15 +--
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/platform.h | 4 +-
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/simone.c | 12 +--
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/snappercl15.c | 12 +--
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/vision_ep9307.c | 7 +-
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/avila-setup.c | 17 +++-
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/dsmg600-setup.c | 16 +++-
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/fsg-setup.c | 16 +++-
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/goramo_mlr.c | 24 ++---
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/ixdp425-setup.c | 16 +++-
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/nas100d-setup.c | 16 +++-
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/nslu2-setup.c | 16 +++-
> arch/arm/mach-ks8695/board-acs5k.c | 13 ++-
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/palmz72.c | 12 ++-
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c | 27 +++++-
> arch/arm/mach-sa1100/simpad.c | 12 ++-
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf533/boards/blackstamp.c | 19 +++-
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf533/boards/ezkit.c | 18 +++-
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf533/boards/stamp.c | 18 +++-
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/boards/ezkit.c | 18 +++-
> arch/mips/alchemy/board-gpr.c | 19 +++-
> arch/mips/ath79/mach-pb44.c | 16 +++-
For MIPS:
Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-09 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-17 9:38 [PATCH 0/7] I2C GPIO to use gpiolibs open drain Linus Walleij
2017-09-17 9:38 ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-17 9:39 ` [PATCH 1/7] i2c: gpio: Convert to use descriptors Linus Walleij
2017-09-17 9:39 ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-18 8:36 ` Lee Jones
2017-09-18 8:36 ` Lee Jones
2017-09-18 19:00 ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-18 19:00 ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-19 9:19 ` Ben Dooks
2017-09-19 9:19 ` Ben Dooks
2017-09-19 9:19 ` Ben Dooks
2017-10-02 1:05 ` Linus Walleij
2017-10-02 1:05 ` Linus Walleij
2017-10-02 16:11 ` Ben Dooks
2017-10-02 16:11 ` Ben Dooks
2017-10-04 10:57 ` Lee Jones
2017-10-04 10:57 ` Lee Jones
2017-10-09 14:24 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2017-10-09 14:24 ` Ralf Baechle
2017-09-17 9:39 ` [PATCH 2/7] gpio: Make it possible for consumers to enforce open drain Linus Walleij
2017-09-17 9:39 ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-17 9:39 ` [PATCH 3/7] i2c: gpio: Enforce open drain through gpiolib Linus Walleij
2017-09-17 9:39 ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-17 9:39 ` [PATCH 4/7] i2c: gpio: Augment all boardfiles to use open drain Linus Walleij
2017-09-17 9:39 ` Linus Walleij
2017-10-06 20:52 ` Robert Jarzmik
2017-10-06 20:52 ` Robert Jarzmik
2017-10-06 20:52 ` Robert Jarzmik
2017-10-09 14:28 ` Ralf Baechle
2017-10-09 14:28 ` Ralf Baechle
2017-10-11 10:37 ` [Adi-buildroot-devel] " Wu, Aaron
2017-10-11 10:37 ` Wu, Aaron
2017-09-17 9:39 ` [PATCH 5/7] i2c: gpio: Local vars in probe Linus Walleij
2017-09-17 9:39 ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-18 9:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-09-18 9:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-09-18 9:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
[not found] ` <20170917093906.16325-1-linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-09-17 9:39 ` [PATCH 6/7] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-gpio: Add support for named gpios Linus Walleij
2017-09-17 9:39 ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-17 9:39 ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-20 20:53 ` Rob Herring
2017-09-20 20:53 ` Rob Herring
2017-09-17 9:39 ` [PATCH 7/7] i2c: gpio: Add support for named gpios in DT Linus Walleij
2017-09-17 9:39 ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-18 9:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-09-18 9:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-09-18 9:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-09-18 9:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-09-18 9:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-09-18 19:09 ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-18 19:09 ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-18 11:15 ` [PATCH 0/7] I2C GPIO to use gpiolibs open drain Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-09-18 11:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-09-18 11:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171009142403.GA17971@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hs@denx.de \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=realmz6@gmail.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.